通过信息生态系统和ELM理论研究基于语言的新评论特征对评论有用性的影响:跨平台的异质性分析

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Sun Qiao, Wu Feng
{"title":"通过信息生态系统和ELM理论研究基于语言的新评论特征对评论有用性的影响:跨平台的异质性分析","authors":"Sun Qiao,&nbsp;Wu Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although online review helpfulness has been extensively discussed, examining it at the platform level can still yield new insights. Drawing on ELM and information ecosystem theories, this study identifies heterogeneity in review features and their impact on helpfulness across platforms through a multimethod analysis of 82,130 reviews on JD and TikTok. Econometric analysis revealed that reviews on mature platforms contain richer objective content, more diverse language styles, and stronger semantic associations. In terms of content, objective content diversity positively affects helpfulness on emerging platforms, while it has the opposite effect on mature platforms. Negative sentiment significantly affects helpfulness only on mature platforms, and positive sentiment has no significant effect on either platform. In terms of language style, the analysis indicated that language style diversity positively impacts the helpfulness of emerging platforms. However, four specific styles (figurative, comparative, interrogative and exaggerative) negatively affect helpfulness on emerging platforms, with only comparative style having a significant negative effect on mature platforms. In terms of semantic association, the results show a more substantial positive impact on emerging platforms. Machine learning-based performance analysis corroborates the core findings of the econometric analysis. This study provides novel findings to the existing literature and provides managerial implications for different platforms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of novel linguistic-based review features on review helpfulness through information ecosystem and ELM theories: Heterogeneity analysis across platforms\",\"authors\":\"Sun Qiao,&nbsp;Wu Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although online review helpfulness has been extensively discussed, examining it at the platform level can still yield new insights. Drawing on ELM and information ecosystem theories, this study identifies heterogeneity in review features and their impact on helpfulness across platforms through a multimethod analysis of 82,130 reviews on JD and TikTok. Econometric analysis revealed that reviews on mature platforms contain richer objective content, more diverse language styles, and stronger semantic associations. In terms of content, objective content diversity positively affects helpfulness on emerging platforms, while it has the opposite effect on mature platforms. Negative sentiment significantly affects helpfulness only on mature platforms, and positive sentiment has no significant effect on either platform. In terms of language style, the analysis indicated that language style diversity positively impacts the helpfulness of emerging platforms. However, four specific styles (figurative, comparative, interrogative and exaggerative) negatively affect helpfulness on emerging platforms, with only comparative style having a significant negative effect on mature platforms. In terms of semantic association, the results show a more substantial positive impact on emerging platforms. Machine learning-based performance analysis corroborates the core findings of the econometric analysis. This study provides novel findings to the existing literature and provides managerial implications for different platforms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002255\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224002255","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在线评论的有用性已被广泛讨论,但在平台层面对其进行研究仍能产生新的见解。本研究借鉴ELM和信息生态系统理论,通过对京东和嘀嗒上的82130条评论进行多方法分析,确定了不同平台上评论特征的异质性及其对有用性的影响。计量经济学分析表明,成熟平台上的评论包含更丰富的客观内容、更多样的语言风格和更强的语义关联。就内容而言,客观内容的多样性对新兴平台的帮助性有积极影响,而对成熟平台的影响则相反。消极情绪只对成熟平台的帮助性有明显影响,而积极情绪对这两个平台都没有明显影响。在语言风格方面,分析表明,语言风格多样性对新兴平台的帮助性有积极影响。然而,四种特定的语体(比喻、比较、质问和夸张)对新兴平台的帮助性有负面影响,只有比较语体对成熟平台有显著的负面影响。就语义关联而言,结果显示对新兴平台的积极影响更大。基于机器学习的性能分析证实了计量经济学分析的核心结论。本研究为现有文献提供了新的发现,并为不同平台提供了管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of novel linguistic-based review features on review helpfulness through information ecosystem and ELM theories: Heterogeneity analysis across platforms

Although online review helpfulness has been extensively discussed, examining it at the platform level can still yield new insights. Drawing on ELM and information ecosystem theories, this study identifies heterogeneity in review features and their impact on helpfulness across platforms through a multimethod analysis of 82,130 reviews on JD and TikTok. Econometric analysis revealed that reviews on mature platforms contain richer objective content, more diverse language styles, and stronger semantic associations. In terms of content, objective content diversity positively affects helpfulness on emerging platforms, while it has the opposite effect on mature platforms. Negative sentiment significantly affects helpfulness only on mature platforms, and positive sentiment has no significant effect on either platform. In terms of language style, the analysis indicated that language style diversity positively impacts the helpfulness of emerging platforms. However, four specific styles (figurative, comparative, interrogative and exaggerative) negatively affect helpfulness on emerging platforms, with only comparative style having a significant negative effect on mature platforms. In terms of semantic association, the results show a more substantial positive impact on emerging platforms. Machine learning-based performance analysis corroborates the core findings of the econometric analysis. This study provides novel findings to the existing literature and provides managerial implications for different platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信