八旬老人和非耄耋老人急性心肌梗死的早期介入策略

Circulation reports Pub Date : 2024-06-22 eCollection Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0049
Junya Komatsu, Yu-Ki Nishimura, Hiroki Sugane, Hayato Hosoda, Ryu-Ichiro Imai, Yoko Nakaoka, Koji Nishida, Shinji Mito, Shu-Ichi Seki, Toru Kubo, Hiroaki Kitaoka, Sho-Ichi Kubokawa, Kazuya Kawai, Naohisa Hamashige, Yoshinori L Doi
{"title":"八旬老人和非耄耋老人急性心肌梗死的早期介入策略","authors":"Junya Komatsu, Yu-Ki Nishimura, Hiroki Sugane, Hayato Hosoda, Ryu-Ichiro Imai, Yoko Nakaoka, Koji Nishida, Shinji Mito, Shu-Ichi Seki, Toru Kubo, Hiroaki Kitaoka, Sho-Ichi Kubokawa, Kazuya Kawai, Naohisa Hamashige, Yoshinori L Doi","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Older adults with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are currently a rapidly growing population. However, their clinical presentation and outcomes remain unresolved. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> A total of 268 consecutive AMI patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics and outcomes with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality within 1 year. Patients aged ≥80 years (Over-80; n=100) were compared with those aged ≤79 years (Under-79; n=168). (1) Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was frequently and similarly performed in both the Over-80 group and the Under-79 group (86% vs. 89%; P=0.52). (2) Killip class III-IV (P<0.01), in-hospital mortality (P<0.01), MACE (P=0.03) and all-cause mortality (P<0.01) were more prevalent in the Over-80 group than in the Under-79 group. (3) In the Over-80 group, frail patients showed a significantly worse clinical outcome compared with non-frail patients. (4) Multivariate analysis revealed Killip class III-IV was associated with MACE (odds ratio [OR]=3.51; P=0.02) and all-cause mortality (OR=9.49; P<0.01) in the Over-80 group. PCI was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (OR=0.13; P=0.02) in the Over-80 group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The rate of primary PCI did not decline with age. Although octogenarians/nonagenarians showed more severe clinical presentation and worse short-term outcomes compared with younger patients, particularly in those with frailty, the prognosis may be improved by early invasive strategy even in these very old patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Invasive Strategy for Octogenarians and Nonagenarians With Acute Myocardial Infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Junya Komatsu, Yu-Ki Nishimura, Hiroki Sugane, Hayato Hosoda, Ryu-Ichiro Imai, Yoko Nakaoka, Koji Nishida, Shinji Mito, Shu-Ichi Seki, Toru Kubo, Hiroaki Kitaoka, Sho-Ichi Kubokawa, Kazuya Kawai, Naohisa Hamashige, Yoshinori L Doi\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Older adults with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are currently a rapidly growing population. However, their clinical presentation and outcomes remain unresolved. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> A total of 268 consecutive AMI patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics and outcomes with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality within 1 year. Patients aged ≥80 years (Over-80; n=100) were compared with those aged ≤79 years (Under-79; n=168). (1) Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was frequently and similarly performed in both the Over-80 group and the Under-79 group (86% vs. 89%; P=0.52). (2) Killip class III-IV (P<0.01), in-hospital mortality (P<0.01), MACE (P=0.03) and all-cause mortality (P<0.01) were more prevalent in the Over-80 group than in the Under-79 group. (3) In the Over-80 group, frail patients showed a significantly worse clinical outcome compared with non-frail patients. (4) Multivariate analysis revealed Killip class III-IV was associated with MACE (odds ratio [OR]=3.51; P=0.02) and all-cause mortality (OR=9.49; P<0.01) in the Over-80 group. PCI was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (OR=0.13; P=0.02) in the Over-80 group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The rate of primary PCI did not decline with age. Although octogenarians/nonagenarians showed more severe clinical presentation and worse short-term outcomes compared with younger patients, particularly in those with frailty, the prognosis may be improved by early invasive strategy even in these very old patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,患有急性心肌梗死(AMI)的老年人口正在迅速增长。然而,他们的临床表现和预后仍未得到解决。方法和结果:对268名连续的急性心肌梗死患者的临床特征、1年内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和全因死亡率的结果进行了分析。年龄≥80岁的患者(80岁以上;100人)与年龄≤79岁的患者(79岁以下;168人)进行了比较。(1)80 岁以上组和 79 岁以下组都经常进行初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(86% vs. 89%; P=0.52)。(2)基利普分级 III-IV 级(PC 结论:初级 PCI 的比例并未随着年龄的增长而下降。虽然与年轻患者相比,八旬老人/非耄耋老人的临床表现更严重,短期预后更差,尤其是那些体弱的患者,但即使是这些高龄患者,早期介入策略也可改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Invasive Strategy for Octogenarians and Nonagenarians With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Older adults with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are currently a rapidly growing population. However, their clinical presentation and outcomes remain unresolved. Methods and Results: A total of 268 consecutive AMI patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics and outcomes with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality within 1 year. Patients aged ≥80 years (Over-80; n=100) were compared with those aged ≤79 years (Under-79; n=168). (1) Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was frequently and similarly performed in both the Over-80 group and the Under-79 group (86% vs. 89%; P=0.52). (2) Killip class III-IV (P<0.01), in-hospital mortality (P<0.01), MACE (P=0.03) and all-cause mortality (P<0.01) were more prevalent in the Over-80 group than in the Under-79 group. (3) In the Over-80 group, frail patients showed a significantly worse clinical outcome compared with non-frail patients. (4) Multivariate analysis revealed Killip class III-IV was associated with MACE (odds ratio [OR]=3.51; P=0.02) and all-cause mortality (OR=9.49; P<0.01) in the Over-80 group. PCI was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (OR=0.13; P=0.02) in the Over-80 group. Conclusions: The rate of primary PCI did not decline with age. Although octogenarians/nonagenarians showed more severe clinical presentation and worse short-term outcomes compared with younger patients, particularly in those with frailty, the prognosis may be improved by early invasive strategy even in these very old patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信