照顾者与婴儿视觉神经认知之间的关系

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Aimee Theyer, Christina Davidson, Ghada Amaireh, Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar
{"title":"照顾者与婴儿视觉神经认知之间的关系","authors":"Aimee Theyer,&nbsp;Christina Davidson,&nbsp;Ghada Amaireh,&nbsp;Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.101975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous work has shown that caregiver attention shapes visual cognition in infants through dyadic interactions. Is this association measurable when visual cognition is objectively measured in caregivers and infants using comparable experimental paradigms? In the current study, we presented infants (N = 86) and caregivers (N = 78) with age-specific variants of the same preferential looking visual cognition task to investigate whether caregiver visual cognition was associated with their infants’ visual cognition. In each trial of the task, two side-by-side flashing displays of coloured shapes were presented. On the ‘unchanging’ side, the colours of the shapes remained the same. On the ‘changing’ side, the colour of one shape changed after each flash. Load was varied by changing the number of shapes across trials (low, medium, and high loads). We extracted looking dynamics using video recordings and brain function using functional near-infrared spectroscopy as both infants and caregivers engaged with the task. Change preference (CP) score, which represented the amount of time spent looking at the changing side divided by the total looking duration, showed a load-dependent modulation for both infants and caregivers. Both groups showed the highest CP scores at the low load. Further, higher caregiver CP scores was associated with higher infant CP scores at the low load. Both infants and caregivers engaged canonical regions of the fronto-parietal network involved in visual cognition. Critically, higher caregiver CP scores were associated with greater activation in the left superior parietal lobule in younger infants, a region involved in allocating visuo-spatial attention and working memory maintenance. Further, there was spatial overlap between performance-dependent regions in the right parietal cortex in caregivers and younger infants. Our findings provide first evidence of a heritability-related visual neurocognitive association between caregivers and their children in the first year of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101975"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000547/pdfft?md5=e991bbc8f9cc217099ae8cd0ab8e8272&pid=1-s2.0-S0163638324000547-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between caregiver and infant visual neurocognition\",\"authors\":\"Aimee Theyer,&nbsp;Christina Davidson,&nbsp;Ghada Amaireh,&nbsp;Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.101975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous work has shown that caregiver attention shapes visual cognition in infants through dyadic interactions. Is this association measurable when visual cognition is objectively measured in caregivers and infants using comparable experimental paradigms? In the current study, we presented infants (N = 86) and caregivers (N = 78) with age-specific variants of the same preferential looking visual cognition task to investigate whether caregiver visual cognition was associated with their infants’ visual cognition. In each trial of the task, two side-by-side flashing displays of coloured shapes were presented. On the ‘unchanging’ side, the colours of the shapes remained the same. On the ‘changing’ side, the colour of one shape changed after each flash. Load was varied by changing the number of shapes across trials (low, medium, and high loads). We extracted looking dynamics using video recordings and brain function using functional near-infrared spectroscopy as both infants and caregivers engaged with the task. Change preference (CP) score, which represented the amount of time spent looking at the changing side divided by the total looking duration, showed a load-dependent modulation for both infants and caregivers. Both groups showed the highest CP scores at the low load. Further, higher caregiver CP scores was associated with higher infant CP scores at the low load. Both infants and caregivers engaged canonical regions of the fronto-parietal network involved in visual cognition. Critically, higher caregiver CP scores were associated with greater activation in the left superior parietal lobule in younger infants, a region involved in allocating visuo-spatial attention and working memory maintenance. Further, there was spatial overlap between performance-dependent regions in the right parietal cortex in caregivers and younger infants. Our findings provide first evidence of a heritability-related visual neurocognitive association between caregivers and their children in the first year of life.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000547/pdfft?md5=e991bbc8f9cc217099ae8cd0ab8e8272&pid=1-s2.0-S0163638324000547-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Behavior & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000547\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000547","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,照顾者的注意力通过双向互动影响婴儿的视觉认知。在使用可比实验范式对照顾者和婴儿的视觉认知进行客观测量时,这种关联是否可以测量?在本研究中,我们向婴儿(86 人)和照顾者(78 人)提供了相同的优先注视视觉认知任务的特定年龄变体,以调查照顾者的视觉认知是否与婴儿的视觉认知相关。在每次任务试验中,都会出现两个并排闪烁的彩色图形。在 "不变 "的一侧,图形的颜色保持不变。在 "变化 "的一侧,每次闪光后一个形状的颜色都会改变。通过改变试验中图形的数量来改变负荷(低、中、高负荷)。在婴儿和看护人参与任务的过程中,我们使用视频记录提取观察动态,并使用功能性近红外光谱提取大脑功能。变化偏好(CP)分数代表了婴儿和看护者看变化侧所花费的时间除以总的观察持续时间。在低负荷时,两组婴儿的 CP 分数都最高。此外,在低负荷时,看护者的 CP 分数越高,婴儿的 CP 分数也越高。婴儿和看护者都参与了前顶叶网络中涉及视觉认知的典型区域。重要的是,在年龄较小的婴儿中,照顾者CP得分越高,其左侧顶叶上部的激活程度越高,该区域参与视觉空间注意力的分配和工作记忆的维持。此外,在照顾者和年幼婴儿的右顶叶皮层中,与表现相关的区域存在空间重叠。我们的研究结果首次证明,在婴儿出生后的第一年,照顾者和他们的孩子之间存在与遗传有关的视觉神经认知关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between caregiver and infant visual neurocognition

Previous work has shown that caregiver attention shapes visual cognition in infants through dyadic interactions. Is this association measurable when visual cognition is objectively measured in caregivers and infants using comparable experimental paradigms? In the current study, we presented infants (N = 86) and caregivers (N = 78) with age-specific variants of the same preferential looking visual cognition task to investigate whether caregiver visual cognition was associated with their infants’ visual cognition. In each trial of the task, two side-by-side flashing displays of coloured shapes were presented. On the ‘unchanging’ side, the colours of the shapes remained the same. On the ‘changing’ side, the colour of one shape changed after each flash. Load was varied by changing the number of shapes across trials (low, medium, and high loads). We extracted looking dynamics using video recordings and brain function using functional near-infrared spectroscopy as both infants and caregivers engaged with the task. Change preference (CP) score, which represented the amount of time spent looking at the changing side divided by the total looking duration, showed a load-dependent modulation for both infants and caregivers. Both groups showed the highest CP scores at the low load. Further, higher caregiver CP scores was associated with higher infant CP scores at the low load. Both infants and caregivers engaged canonical regions of the fronto-parietal network involved in visual cognition. Critically, higher caregiver CP scores were associated with greater activation in the left superior parietal lobule in younger infants, a region involved in allocating visuo-spatial attention and working memory maintenance. Further, there was spatial overlap between performance-dependent regions in the right parietal cortex in caregivers and younger infants. Our findings provide first evidence of a heritability-related visual neurocognitive association between caregivers and their children in the first year of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信