髂筋膜室阻滞与静脉镇痛在改善股骨骨折患者疼痛控制方面的比较。

Mohammed Adinoyi Usman, Mohammed Bashir Rabiu, Dalhat Salahu
{"title":"髂筋膜室阻滞与静脉镇痛在改善股骨骨折患者疼痛控制方面的比较。","authors":"Mohammed Adinoyi Usman, Mohammed Bashir Rabiu, Dalhat Salahu","doi":"10.4103/jwas.jwas_66_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most common approach to managing severe pain following femoral fracture is with intravenous systemic analgesics, such as opioid analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs associated with side effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting. These side effects might be intolerable in trauma patients and may result in under treatment of pain. Improving the quality of analgesia may reduce these intolerable side effects. Our study compared the efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) with intravenous analgesics for preoperative pain management of femoral fractures.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was a quality improvement prospective randomised study, where 50 patients aged between 18 and 65 years, and American society of anesthesiologists I and II were recruited into two groups. Group A received FICB with a combination of 0.4 mL/kg of 0.5% plain bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200,000 made up to 30 mL, while group B received placebo FICB using 30 mL normal saline. Also, group B received a combination of intravenous paracetamol 15 mg/kg not exceeding 900 mg and tramadol 1 mg/kg not exceeding 100 mg, while group A received an equal volume as normal saline intravenously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed no significant difference in age, gender, associated injuries, X-ray description of fractures, and mechanism of injuries; however, there was a significant difference in the NRS-pain score at 30 min, summed pain intensity difference for 4 h and patient satisfaction in the FICB group compared to the standard group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that FICB results in better pain control compared to a combination of intravenous tramadol and paracetamol in patients with femoral fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of fascia iliaca compartment block with intravenous analgesia to improve pain control in patients with femoral fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Adinoyi Usman, Mohammed Bashir Rabiu, Dalhat Salahu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jwas.jwas_66_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most common approach to managing severe pain following femoral fracture is with intravenous systemic analgesics, such as opioid analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs associated with side effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting. These side effects might be intolerable in trauma patients and may result in under treatment of pain. Improving the quality of analgesia may reduce these intolerable side effects. Our study compared the efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) with intravenous analgesics for preoperative pain management of femoral fractures.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was a quality improvement prospective randomised study, where 50 patients aged between 18 and 65 years, and American society of anesthesiologists I and II were recruited into two groups. Group A received FICB with a combination of 0.4 mL/kg of 0.5% plain bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200,000 made up to 30 mL, while group B received placebo FICB using 30 mL normal saline. Also, group B received a combination of intravenous paracetamol 15 mg/kg not exceeding 900 mg and tramadol 1 mg/kg not exceeding 100 mg, while group A received an equal volume as normal saline intravenously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed no significant difference in age, gender, associated injuries, X-ray description of fractures, and mechanism of injuries; however, there was a significant difference in the NRS-pain score at 30 min, summed pain intensity difference for 4 h and patient satisfaction in the FICB group compared to the standard group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that FICB results in better pain control compared to a combination of intravenous tramadol and paracetamol in patients with femoral fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_66_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_66_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:股骨骨折后的剧烈疼痛最常见的治疗方法是静脉注射全身性镇痛药,如阿片类镇痛药和非甾体类抗炎药,这些药物会产生呼吸抑制、恶心和呕吐等副作用。这些副作用可能是创伤患者无法忍受的,并可能导致疼痛治疗不足。提高镇痛质量可减少这些难以忍受的副作用。我们的研究比较了髂筋膜室阻滞(FICB)与静脉镇痛剂在股骨骨折术前疼痛治疗中的疗效:该研究是一项质量改进前瞻性随机研究,共招募了 50 名年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会 I 级和 II 级的患者,分为两组。A 组接受 0.5%普通布比卡因 0.4 mL/kg 和肾上腺素 1:200,000 混合至 30 mL 的 FICB,B 组接受安慰剂 FICB,使用 30 mL 生理盐水。此外,B 组静脉注射扑热息痛 15 毫克/千克(不超过 900 毫克)和曲马多 1 毫克/千克(不超过 100 毫克),而 A 组静脉注射等量生理盐水:研究显示,FICB 组与标准组相比,在年龄、性别、相关损伤、骨折的 X 射线描述和损伤机制方面无明显差异;但在 30 分钟的 NRS 疼痛评分、4 小时的疼痛强度差异总和以及患者满意度方面,FICB 组与标准组相比有明显差异:研究表明,与静脉注射曲马多和扑热息痛联合用药相比,股骨骨折患者使用 FICB 能更好地控制疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of fascia iliaca compartment block with intravenous analgesia to improve pain control in patients with femoral fracture.

Background: The most common approach to managing severe pain following femoral fracture is with intravenous systemic analgesics, such as opioid analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs associated with side effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting. These side effects might be intolerable in trauma patients and may result in under treatment of pain. Improving the quality of analgesia may reduce these intolerable side effects. Our study compared the efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) with intravenous analgesics for preoperative pain management of femoral fractures.

Patients and methods: The study was a quality improvement prospective randomised study, where 50 patients aged between 18 and 65 years, and American society of anesthesiologists I and II were recruited into two groups. Group A received FICB with a combination of 0.4 mL/kg of 0.5% plain bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200,000 made up to 30 mL, while group B received placebo FICB using 30 mL normal saline. Also, group B received a combination of intravenous paracetamol 15 mg/kg not exceeding 900 mg and tramadol 1 mg/kg not exceeding 100 mg, while group A received an equal volume as normal saline intravenously.

Results: The study revealed no significant difference in age, gender, associated injuries, X-ray description of fractures, and mechanism of injuries; however, there was a significant difference in the NRS-pain score at 30 min, summed pain intensity difference for 4 h and patient satisfaction in the FICB group compared to the standard group.

Conclusion: The study revealed that FICB results in better pain control compared to a combination of intravenous tramadol and paracetamol in patients with femoral fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信