预防淋球菌感染的脑膜炎球菌疫苗的有效性和影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bing Wang PhD , Hassen Mohammed PhD , Prabha Andraweera PhD , Mark McMillan PhD , Helen Marshall MD
{"title":"预防淋球菌感染的脑膜炎球菌疫苗的有效性和影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Bing Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Hassen Mohammed PhD ,&nbsp;Prabha Andraweera PhD ,&nbsp;Mark McMillan PhD ,&nbsp;Helen Marshall MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To systematically review and synthesis the evidence of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and impact (VI) of meningococcal vaccines in preventing gonorrhoea.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We systematically evaluated studies. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, clinical trial registries, and major health and immunisation conferences. Meta-analysis was performed with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model to estimate the pooled VE.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve studies met the criteria for inclusion. VE of meningococcal B (MenB) outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines was evaluated in nine studies, with one study evaluating a non-OMV vaccine, MenB-FHbp. The majority of studies targeted individuals aged 15-30 years. Adjusted VE for OMV vaccines against gonorrhoea ranged from 22% to 46%. MenB-FHbp did not show protection against gonorrhoea. The pooled VE estimates of OMV vaccines against any gonorrhoea infection following the full vaccine series were 33-34%. VI was assessed for 4CMenB in Canada and Australia, for VA-MENGOC-BC in Cuba; and for MenBvac in Norway. VI ranged from a 30%-59% reduction in gonorrhoea incidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>4CMenB and other MenB-OMV vaccines show moderate effectiveness against gonorrhoea. Further research is required to explore the factors associated with vaccine protection, informing more effective vaccination strategies for the management of gonococcal infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001592/pdfft?md5=cce8978b62991cf481dcddb93bd31974&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001592-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccine effectiveness and impact of meningococcal vaccines against gonococcal infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Bing Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Hassen Mohammed PhD ,&nbsp;Prabha Andraweera PhD ,&nbsp;Mark McMillan PhD ,&nbsp;Helen Marshall MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To systematically review and synthesis the evidence of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and impact (VI) of meningococcal vaccines in preventing gonorrhoea.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We systematically evaluated studies. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, clinical trial registries, and major health and immunisation conferences. Meta-analysis was performed with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model to estimate the pooled VE.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve studies met the criteria for inclusion. VE of meningococcal B (MenB) outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines was evaluated in nine studies, with one study evaluating a non-OMV vaccine, MenB-FHbp. The majority of studies targeted individuals aged 15-30 years. Adjusted VE for OMV vaccines against gonorrhoea ranged from 22% to 46%. MenB-FHbp did not show protection against gonorrhoea. The pooled VE estimates of OMV vaccines against any gonorrhoea infection following the full vaccine series were 33-34%. VI was assessed for 4CMenB in Canada and Australia, for VA-MENGOC-BC in Cuba; and for MenBvac in Norway. VI ranged from a 30%-59% reduction in gonorrhoea incidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>4CMenB and other MenB-OMV vaccines show moderate effectiveness against gonorrhoea. Further research is required to explore the factors associated with vaccine protection, informing more effective vaccination strategies for the management of gonococcal infections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001592/pdfft?md5=cce8978b62991cf481dcddb93bd31974&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001592-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001592\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的系统回顾和综合脑膜炎球菌疫苗在预防淋病方面的有效性(VE)和影响(VI)的证据:我们系统地评估了各项研究。我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、Google Scholar、临床试验登记处以及主要的健康和免疫会议上进行了文献检索。采用 DerSimonian-Laird 随机效应模型进行 Meta 分析,以估计汇总 VE:结果:12 项研究符合纳入标准。九项研究评估了脑膜炎球菌 B (MenB) 外膜囊 (OMV) 疫苗的 VE,一项研究评估了非 OMV 疫苗 MenB-FHbp。大多数研究的对象是 15-30 岁的人群。OMV疫苗预防淋病的调整VE从22%到46%不等。MenB-FHbp 未显示出对淋病的保护作用。接种全套疫苗后,OMV 疫苗对任何淋病感染的合计 VE 估计值为 33-34%。加拿大和澳大利亚评估了 4CMenB 的 VI 值,古巴评估了 VA-MENGOC-BC 的 VI 值,挪威评估了 MenBvac 的 VI 值。淋病发病率的 VI 降低了 30%-59% 不等:结论:4CMenB 和其他 MenB-OMV 疫苗对淋病的预防效果一般。需要进一步开展研究,探索与疫苗保护相关的因素,从而为管理淋球菌感染提供更有效的疫苗接种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vaccine effectiveness and impact of meningococcal vaccines against gonococcal infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To systematically review and synthesis the evidence of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and impact (VI) of meningococcal vaccines in preventing gonorrhoea.

Methods

We systematically evaluated studies. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Google Scholar, clinical trial registries, and major health and immunisation conferences. Meta-analysis was performed with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model to estimate the pooled VE.

Results

Twelve studies met the criteria for inclusion. VE of meningococcal B (MenB) outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines was evaluated in nine studies, with one study evaluating a non-OMV vaccine, MenB-FHbp. The majority of studies targeted individuals aged 15-30 years. Adjusted VE for OMV vaccines against gonorrhoea ranged from 22% to 46%. MenB-FHbp did not show protection against gonorrhoea. The pooled VE estimates of OMV vaccines against any gonorrhoea infection following the full vaccine series were 33-34%. VI was assessed for 4CMenB in Canada and Australia, for VA-MENGOC-BC in Cuba; and for MenBvac in Norway. VI ranged from a 30%-59% reduction in gonorrhoea incidence.

Conclusions

4CMenB and other MenB-OMV vaccines show moderate effectiveness against gonorrhoea. Further research is required to explore the factors associated with vaccine protection, informing more effective vaccination strategies for the management of gonococcal infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信