Shoshana R Shelton, Christopher D Nelson, Maureen Sullivan, Kelly Wroblewski, Erik Mueller, Tyler Wolford
{"title":"加强美国公共卫生实验室系统:冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)事后审查研讨会摘要。","authors":"Shoshana R Shelton, Christopher D Nelson, Maureen Sullivan, Kelly Wroblewski, Erik Mueller, Tyler Wolford","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the significance of public health laboratories across the United States, while also revealing weaknesses in the laboratory system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify actionable recommendations for building a more resilient public health laboratory system based on previously published lessons learned from COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In April 2023, the Association of Public Health Laboratories, in cooperation with RAND , convened a 1.5-day after action review workshop of approximately 30 public health laboratory stakeholders to reevaluate priorities, improve processes, and affect policies.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Analysis of workshop discussions identified 5 priority areas and 19 recommendations related to clarifying laboratories' unique role and promoting workforce capacity/agility, technology, and collaboration with governmental and nongovernmental partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the identified priority areas, workshop participants described how the recommendations would address challenges encountered during COVID-19 and contribute to strengthening the system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the risk of novel infectious diseases persists and grows, the importance of maintaining laboratory response capabilities is likely to increase. Addressing the system's weaknesses will require active engagement of laboratories and the many stakeholders who depend on them, along with consistent, adequate funding to strengthen and sustain capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"710-717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening the US Public Health Lab System: Summary of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) After Action Review Workshop.\",\"authors\":\"Shoshana R Shelton, Christopher D Nelson, Maureen Sullivan, Kelly Wroblewski, Erik Mueller, Tyler Wolford\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the significance of public health laboratories across the United States, while also revealing weaknesses in the laboratory system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify actionable recommendations for building a more resilient public health laboratory system based on previously published lessons learned from COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In April 2023, the Association of Public Health Laboratories, in cooperation with RAND , convened a 1.5-day after action review workshop of approximately 30 public health laboratory stakeholders to reevaluate priorities, improve processes, and affect policies.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Analysis of workshop discussions identified 5 priority areas and 19 recommendations related to clarifying laboratories' unique role and promoting workforce capacity/agility, technology, and collaboration with governmental and nongovernmental partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the identified priority areas, workshop participants described how the recommendations would address challenges encountered during COVID-19 and contribute to strengthening the system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As the risk of novel infectious diseases persists and grows, the importance of maintaining laboratory response capabilities is likely to increase. Addressing the system's weaknesses will require active engagement of laboratories and the many stakeholders who depend on them, along with consistent, adequate funding to strengthen and sustain capabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"710-717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001948\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:COVID-19 大流行凸显了全美公共卫生实验室的重要性,同时也暴露了实验室系统的薄弱环节:设计、背景和参与者:2023 年 4 月,美国公共卫生实验室协会(Association of Public Health Laboratories)与美国国家卫生研究院(National Health Institute of National Health, NRC)联合举办了一次研讨会:2023 年 4 月,公共卫生实验室协会与兰德公司合作,召集约 30 名公共卫生实验室利益相关者召开了为期 1.5 天的行动后审查研讨会,以重新评估优先事项、改进流程并影响政策:通过对研讨会讨论内容的分析,确定了 5 个优先领域和 19 项建议,这些领域和建议涉及明确实验室的独特作用、促进劳动力能力/敏捷性、技术以及与政府和非政府合作伙伴的合作:在确定的优先领域内,研讨会与会者描述了这些建议将如何应对 COVID-19 期间遇到的挑战并为加强该系统做出贡献:随着新型传染病风险的持续存在和增长,保持实验室应对能力的重要性可能会增加。要解决该系统的薄弱环节,需要实验室和依赖实验室的众多利益相关者的积极参与,同时还需要持续、充足的资金来加强和维持能力。
Strengthening the US Public Health Lab System: Summary of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) After Action Review Workshop.
Context: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the significance of public health laboratories across the United States, while also revealing weaknesses in the laboratory system.
Objective: To identify actionable recommendations for building a more resilient public health laboratory system based on previously published lessons learned from COVID-19.
Design, setting, and participants: In April 2023, the Association of Public Health Laboratories, in cooperation with RAND , convened a 1.5-day after action review workshop of approximately 30 public health laboratory stakeholders to reevaluate priorities, improve processes, and affect policies.
Main outcome measures: Analysis of workshop discussions identified 5 priority areas and 19 recommendations related to clarifying laboratories' unique role and promoting workforce capacity/agility, technology, and collaboration with governmental and nongovernmental partners.
Results: Within the identified priority areas, workshop participants described how the recommendations would address challenges encountered during COVID-19 and contribute to strengthening the system.
Conclusions: As the risk of novel infectious diseases persists and grows, the importance of maintaining laboratory response capabilities is likely to increase. Addressing the system's weaknesses will require active engagement of laboratories and the many stakeholders who depend on them, along with consistent, adequate funding to strengthen and sustain capabilities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.