英国军人队列中从股动脉脉搏波形得出的超短期心率变异性的有效性。

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rabeea Maqsood, Susie Schofield, Alexander N. Bennett, Ahmed Khattab, Anthony M. J. Bull, Nicola T. Fear, Christopher J. Boos
{"title":"英国军人队列中从股动脉脉搏波形得出的超短期心率变异性的有效性。","authors":"Rabeea Maqsood,&nbsp;Susie Schofield,&nbsp;Alexander N. Bennett,&nbsp;Ahmed Khattab,&nbsp;Anthony M. J. Bull,&nbsp;Nicola T. Fear,&nbsp;Christopher J. Boos","doi":"10.1007/s10484-024-09652-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Various non-electrocardiogram (ECG) based methods are considered reliable sources of heart rate variability (HRV) measurement. However, the ultra-short recording of a femoral arterial waveform has never been validated against the gold-standard ECG-based 300s HRV and was the aim of this study.</p><p>A validity study was conducted using a sample from the first follow-up of the longitudinal ADVANCE study UK. The participants were adult servicemen (<i>n</i> = 100); similar in age, rank, and deployment period (Afghanistan 2003–2014). The femoral arterial waveforms (14s) from the pulse wave velocity (PWV) assessment, and ECG (300s) were recorded at rest in the supine position using the Vicorder™ and Bittium Faros™ devices, respectively, in the same session. HRV analysis was performed using Kubios Premium. Resting heart rate (HR) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were reported. The Bland-Altman %plots were constructed to explore the PWV-ECG agreement in HRV measurement. A further exploratory analysis was conducted across methods and durations.</p><p>The participants’ mean age was 38.0 <i>±</i> 5.3 years. Both PWV-derived HR (<i>r</i> = 0.85) and RMSSD (r<sub>s</sub>=0.84) showed strong correlations with their 300s-ECG counterparts (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Mean HR was significantly higher with ECG than PWV (mean bias: -12.71 <i>±</i> 7.73%, 95%CI: -14.25%, -11.18%). In contrast, the difference in RMSSD between the two methods was non-significant [mean bias: -2.90 <i>±</i> 37.82% (95%CI: -10.40%, 4.60%)] indicating good agreement. An exploratory analysis of 14s ECG-vs-300s ECG measurement revealed strong agreement in both RMSSD and HR.</p><p>The 14s PWV-derived RMSSD strongly agrees with the gold-standard (300s-ECG-based) RMSSD at rest. Conversely, HR appears method sensitive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":"49 4","pages":"619 - 627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10484-024-09652-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of Ultra-Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Derived from Femoral Arterial Pulse Waveform in a British Military Cohort\",\"authors\":\"Rabeea Maqsood,&nbsp;Susie Schofield,&nbsp;Alexander N. Bennett,&nbsp;Ahmed Khattab,&nbsp;Anthony M. J. Bull,&nbsp;Nicola T. Fear,&nbsp;Christopher J. Boos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10484-024-09652-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Various non-electrocardiogram (ECG) based methods are considered reliable sources of heart rate variability (HRV) measurement. However, the ultra-short recording of a femoral arterial waveform has never been validated against the gold-standard ECG-based 300s HRV and was the aim of this study.</p><p>A validity study was conducted using a sample from the first follow-up of the longitudinal ADVANCE study UK. The participants were adult servicemen (<i>n</i> = 100); similar in age, rank, and deployment period (Afghanistan 2003–2014). The femoral arterial waveforms (14s) from the pulse wave velocity (PWV) assessment, and ECG (300s) were recorded at rest in the supine position using the Vicorder™ and Bittium Faros™ devices, respectively, in the same session. HRV analysis was performed using Kubios Premium. Resting heart rate (HR) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were reported. The Bland-Altman %plots were constructed to explore the PWV-ECG agreement in HRV measurement. A further exploratory analysis was conducted across methods and durations.</p><p>The participants’ mean age was 38.0 <i>±</i> 5.3 years. Both PWV-derived HR (<i>r</i> = 0.85) and RMSSD (r<sub>s</sub>=0.84) showed strong correlations with their 300s-ECG counterparts (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Mean HR was significantly higher with ECG than PWV (mean bias: -12.71 <i>±</i> 7.73%, 95%CI: -14.25%, -11.18%). In contrast, the difference in RMSSD between the two methods was non-significant [mean bias: -2.90 <i>±</i> 37.82% (95%CI: -10.40%, 4.60%)] indicating good agreement. An exploratory analysis of 14s ECG-vs-300s ECG measurement revealed strong agreement in both RMSSD and HR.</p><p>The 14s PWV-derived RMSSD strongly agrees with the gold-standard (300s-ECG-based) RMSSD at rest. Conversely, HR appears method sensitive.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"619 - 627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10484-024-09652-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10484-024-09652-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10484-024-09652-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各种基于非心电图(ECG)的方法被认为是测量心率变异性(HRV)的可靠来源。然而,股动脉波形的超短记录从未与基于心电图的黄金标准 300s HRV 进行过验证,这也是本研究的目的所在。参与者均为成年军人(n = 100);年龄、军衔和部署时间(2003-2014 年,阿富汗)相似。脉搏波速度(PWV)评估的股动脉波形(14 秒)和心电图(300 秒)是在同一时段分别使用 Vicorder™ 和 Bittium Faros™ 设备在仰卧位休息时记录的。心率变异分析使用 Kubios Premium 进行。报告了静息心率(HR)和连续差值的均方根(RMSSD)。为探讨脉搏波速度与心率变异测量的一致性,绘制了布兰-阿尔特曼百分比图。对不同方法和持续时间进行了进一步的探索性分析。参与者的平均年龄为 38.0 ± 5.3 岁。由脉搏波速度得出的心率(r = 0.85)和 RMSSD(rs = 0.84)与 300s-ECG 的对应值均显示出很强的相关性(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validity of Ultra-Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Derived from Femoral Arterial Pulse Waveform in a British Military Cohort

Validity of Ultra-Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Derived from Femoral Arterial Pulse Waveform in a British Military Cohort

Various non-electrocardiogram (ECG) based methods are considered reliable sources of heart rate variability (HRV) measurement. However, the ultra-short recording of a femoral arterial waveform has never been validated against the gold-standard ECG-based 300s HRV and was the aim of this study.

A validity study was conducted using a sample from the first follow-up of the longitudinal ADVANCE study UK. The participants were adult servicemen (n = 100); similar in age, rank, and deployment period (Afghanistan 2003–2014). The femoral arterial waveforms (14s) from the pulse wave velocity (PWV) assessment, and ECG (300s) were recorded at rest in the supine position using the Vicorder™ and Bittium Faros™ devices, respectively, in the same session. HRV analysis was performed using Kubios Premium. Resting heart rate (HR) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were reported. The Bland-Altman %plots were constructed to explore the PWV-ECG agreement in HRV measurement. A further exploratory analysis was conducted across methods and durations.

The participants’ mean age was 38.0 ± 5.3 years. Both PWV-derived HR (r = 0.85) and RMSSD (rs=0.84) showed strong correlations with their 300s-ECG counterparts (p < 0.001). Mean HR was significantly higher with ECG than PWV (mean bias: -12.71 ± 7.73%, 95%CI: -14.25%, -11.18%). In contrast, the difference in RMSSD between the two methods was non-significant [mean bias: -2.90 ± 37.82% (95%CI: -10.40%, 4.60%)] indicating good agreement. An exploratory analysis of 14s ECG-vs-300s ECG measurement revealed strong agreement in both RMSSD and HR.

The 14s PWV-derived RMSSD strongly agrees with the gold-standard (300s-ECG-based) RMSSD at rest. Conversely, HR appears method sensitive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信