哈特曼-沙克传感器在小瞳孔情况下的估计效果。

IF 1.2 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-08-08 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_123_23
Francisco de Asís Bartol-Puyal, Galadriel Giménez, Silvia Méndez-Martínez, José M Larrosa, Vicente Polo, Luis Pablo
{"title":"哈特曼-沙克传感器在小瞳孔情况下的估计效果。","authors":"Francisco de Asís Bartol-Puyal, Galadriel Giménez, Silvia Méndez-Martínez, José M Larrosa, Vicente Polo, Luis Pablo","doi":"10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_123_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the <i>in vivo</i> efficacy of the estimations of wavefront analyzers using Hartmann-Shack technology to measure optical aberrations when the pupil size is smaller than the evaluated pupil area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients implanted with the monofocal ZCB00 intraocular lens (Johnson and Johnson) were examined with the KR-1W Wavefront Analyzer (Topcon) without pharmacological mydriasis and with it afterward. Optical aberrations were analyzed considering a 4-mm pupil and a 6-mm pupil for both examinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six eyes of 33 patients with a mean axial length of 23.35 ± 0.91 mm were assessed. The mean pupil diameter at the baseline examination was 5.05 ± 0.88 mm and under pharmacological mydriasis, it was 6.29 ± 0.84 mm. Outcomes were similar with and without dilation in the 4-mm comparison. However, there was a great disparity in the 6-mm comparison. Most of the values obtained under mydriasis were statistically lower than at baseline (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The iris interferes with measurements of wavefront aberrations, and therefore, real pupil size should always be checked before evaluating optical aberrations with Hartman-Shack sensors. When pupil size is smaller than the analyzed diameter, ocular, and internal, and sometimes, corneal aberrations are estimated far more positive than real values.</p>","PeriodicalId":46810,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"38 2","pages":"168-172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of estimations of Hartmann-Shack sensors in small pupil sizes.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco de Asís Bartol-Puyal, Galadriel Giménez, Silvia Méndez-Martínez, José M Larrosa, Vicente Polo, Luis Pablo\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_123_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the <i>in vivo</i> efficacy of the estimations of wavefront analyzers using Hartmann-Shack technology to measure optical aberrations when the pupil size is smaller than the evaluated pupil area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients implanted with the monofocal ZCB00 intraocular lens (Johnson and Johnson) were examined with the KR-1W Wavefront Analyzer (Topcon) without pharmacological mydriasis and with it afterward. Optical aberrations were analyzed considering a 4-mm pupil and a 6-mm pupil for both examinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six eyes of 33 patients with a mean axial length of 23.35 ± 0.91 mm were assessed. The mean pupil diameter at the baseline examination was 5.05 ± 0.88 mm and under pharmacological mydriasis, it was 6.29 ± 0.84 mm. Outcomes were similar with and without dilation in the 4-mm comparison. However, there was a great disparity in the 6-mm comparison. Most of the values obtained under mydriasis were statistically lower than at baseline (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The iris interferes with measurements of wavefront aberrations, and therefore, real pupil size should always be checked before evaluating optical aberrations with Hartman-Shack sensors. When pupil size is smaller than the analyzed diameter, ocular, and internal, and sometimes, corneal aberrations are estimated far more positive than real values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"168-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232754/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_123_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_123_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估当瞳孔大小小于评估的瞳孔面积时,使用哈特曼-沙克技术的波前分析仪测量光学像差的估计值在体内的有效性:方法:使用 KR-1W 波前分析仪(Topcon)对植入单焦点 ZCB00 眼内透镜(强生公司)的患者进行检查,检查前和检查后都不使用药物催眠。两次检查分别以 4 毫米瞳孔和 6 毫米瞳孔进行光学像差分析:对 33 名患者的 66 只眼睛进行了评估,其平均眼轴长度为 23.35 ± 0.91 毫米。基线检查时的平均瞳孔直径为(5.05 ± 0.88)毫米,药物散瞳后的平均瞳孔直径为(6.29 ± 0.84)毫米。在 4 毫米的对比中,散瞳和不散瞳的结果相似。但在 6 毫米的对比中,结果却相差甚远。大多数在散瞳状态下获得的数值在统计学上低于基线值(P < 0.05):结论:虹膜会干扰波前像差的测量,因此在使用哈特曼夏克传感器评估光学像差之前,应始终检查真实的瞳孔大小。当瞳孔大小小于分析直径时,眼像差、内像差,有时角膜像差的估算值会比实际值正得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of estimations of Hartmann-Shack sensors in small pupil sizes.

Efficacy of estimations of Hartmann-Shack sensors in small pupil sizes.

Efficacy of estimations of Hartmann-Shack sensors in small pupil sizes.

Efficacy of estimations of Hartmann-Shack sensors in small pupil sizes.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of the estimations of wavefront analyzers using Hartmann-Shack technology to measure optical aberrations when the pupil size is smaller than the evaluated pupil area.

Methods: Patients implanted with the monofocal ZCB00 intraocular lens (Johnson and Johnson) were examined with the KR-1W Wavefront Analyzer (Topcon) without pharmacological mydriasis and with it afterward. Optical aberrations were analyzed considering a 4-mm pupil and a 6-mm pupil for both examinations.

Results: Sixty-six eyes of 33 patients with a mean axial length of 23.35 ± 0.91 mm were assessed. The mean pupil diameter at the baseline examination was 5.05 ± 0.88 mm and under pharmacological mydriasis, it was 6.29 ± 0.84 mm. Outcomes were similar with and without dilation in the 4-mm comparison. However, there was a great disparity in the 6-mm comparison. Most of the values obtained under mydriasis were statistically lower than at baseline (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The iris interferes with measurements of wavefront aberrations, and therefore, real pupil size should always be checked before evaluating optical aberrations with Hartman-Shack sensors. When pupil size is smaller than the analyzed diameter, ocular, and internal, and sometimes, corneal aberrations are estimated far more positive than real values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of ophthalmology. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology publishes original papers, clinical studies, reviews and case reports. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is the official publication of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信