超越标准 GWAS--植物生物学家指南。

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Pieter Clauw, Thomas James Ellis, Hai-Jun Liu, Eriko Sasaki
{"title":"超越标准 GWAS--植物生物学家指南。","authors":"Pieter Clauw, Thomas James Ellis, Hai-Jun Liu, Eriko Sasaki","doi":"10.1093/pcp/pcae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Classic genome-wide association studies (GWAS) look for associations between individual SNPs and phenotypes of interest. With the rapid progress of high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies, GWAS have become increasingly powerful for detecting genetic determinants and their molecular mechanisms underpinning natural phenotypic variation. However, GWAS frequently yield results with neither expected nor promising loci, nor any significant associations. This is often because associations between SNPs and a single phenotype are confounded, for example with the environment, other traits, or complex genetic structures. Such confounding can mask true genotype-phenotype associations, or inflate spurious associations. To address these problems, numerous methods have been developed that go beyond the standard model. Such advanced GWAS models are flexible and can offer improved statistical power for understanding the genetics underlying complex traits. Despite this advantage, these models have not been widely adopted and implemented compared to the standard GWAS approach, partly because this literature is diverse and often technical. In this review, our aim is to provide an overview of the application and the benefits of various advanced GWAS models for handling complex traits and genetic structures, targeting plant biologists who wish to carry out GWAS more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":20575,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Cell Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the standard GWAS - a guide for plant biologists.\",\"authors\":\"Pieter Clauw, Thomas James Ellis, Hai-Jun Liu, Eriko Sasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pcp/pcae079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Classic genome-wide association studies (GWAS) look for associations between individual SNPs and phenotypes of interest. With the rapid progress of high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies, GWAS have become increasingly powerful for detecting genetic determinants and their molecular mechanisms underpinning natural phenotypic variation. However, GWAS frequently yield results with neither expected nor promising loci, nor any significant associations. This is often because associations between SNPs and a single phenotype are confounded, for example with the environment, other traits, or complex genetic structures. Such confounding can mask true genotype-phenotype associations, or inflate spurious associations. To address these problems, numerous methods have been developed that go beyond the standard model. Such advanced GWAS models are flexible and can offer improved statistical power for understanding the genetics underlying complex traits. Despite this advantage, these models have not been widely adopted and implemented compared to the standard GWAS approach, partly because this literature is diverse and often technical. In this review, our aim is to provide an overview of the application and the benefits of various advanced GWAS models for handling complex traits and genetic structures, targeting plant biologists who wish to carry out GWAS more effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Cell Physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Cell Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcae079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Cell Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcae079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经典的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)寻找单个 SNP 与相关表型之间的关联。随着高通量基因分型和表型技术的快速发展,全基因组关联研究在检测遗传决定因素及其支撑自然表型变异的分子机制方面变得越来越强大。然而,GWAS 的结果往往既没有预期的基因位点,也没有有希望的基因位点,更没有任何显著的关联。这往往是因为 SNP 与单一表型之间的关联受到了干扰,例如与环境、其他性状或复杂遗传结构之间的干扰。这种混杂会掩盖基因型与表型之间的真实关联,或夸大虚假关联。为了解决这些问题,人们开发了许多超越标准模型的方法。这些先进的 GWAS 模型非常灵活,能为了解复杂性状的遗传学基础提供更好的统计能力。尽管有这样的优势,但与标准 GWAS 方法相比,这些模型还没有被广泛采用和实施,部分原因是这些文献多种多样,而且往往是技术性的。在这篇综述中,我们的目的是概述各种先进 GWAS 模型在处理复杂性状和遗传结构方面的应用和优势,以希望更有效地开展 GWAS 的植物生物学家为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the standard GWAS - a guide for plant biologists.

Classic genome-wide association studies (GWAS) look for associations between individual SNPs and phenotypes of interest. With the rapid progress of high-throughput genotyping and phenotyping technologies, GWAS have become increasingly powerful for detecting genetic determinants and their molecular mechanisms underpinning natural phenotypic variation. However, GWAS frequently yield results with neither expected nor promising loci, nor any significant associations. This is often because associations between SNPs and a single phenotype are confounded, for example with the environment, other traits, or complex genetic structures. Such confounding can mask true genotype-phenotype associations, or inflate spurious associations. To address these problems, numerous methods have been developed that go beyond the standard model. Such advanced GWAS models are flexible and can offer improved statistical power for understanding the genetics underlying complex traits. Despite this advantage, these models have not been widely adopted and implemented compared to the standard GWAS approach, partly because this literature is diverse and often technical. In this review, our aim is to provide an overview of the application and the benefits of various advanced GWAS models for handling complex traits and genetic structures, targeting plant biologists who wish to carry out GWAS more effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Cell Physiology
Plant and Cell Physiology 生物-细胞生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
166
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Plant & Cell Physiology (PCP) was established in 1959 and is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists (JSPP). The title reflects the journal''s original interest and scope to encompass research not just at the whole-organism level but also at the cellular and subcellular levels. Amongst the broad range of topics covered by this international journal, readers will find the very best original research on plant physiology, biochemistry, cell biology, molecular genetics, epigenetics, biotechnology, bioinformatics and –omics; as well as how plants respond to and interact with their environment (abiotic and biotic factors), and the biology of photosynthetic microorganisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信