仪器润滑剂对修复复合材料机械性能的影响

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
G Pippin, D Tantbirojn, M Wolfgang, J S Nordin, A Versluis
{"title":"仪器润滑剂对修复复合材料机械性能的影响","authors":"G Pippin, D Tantbirojn, M Wolfgang, J S Nordin, A Versluis","doi":"10.2341/23-136-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Using a wetting resin or adhesive system as an instrument lubricant when placing composite layers is commonly practiced to improve handling. This study investigated whether instrument lubricants affected strength, stiffness, or hardness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Composite beams (TPH Spectra) were fabricated using a stainless steel mold (25×2.5×2 mm) in two steps, where the second half (12.5 mm) was added and cured against a cured first half (n=15). The composite surface at the open end of the first half was smoothed using an instrument lubricated with wetting resin (Ultradent) or universal adhesive (ScotchBond Universal), enough to prevent sticking, or without lubrication. An additional beam of each group was characterized using scanning electron microscopy. Monolithic specimens were also fabricated. After 24 hour storage (37°C, 100% humidity), the beams' flexural strength and stiffness were determined by four-point bending. Vickers surface hardness was measured on 24-hour composite samples in 2 mm deep acrylic cavities, cured after the surface was smoothed with the two instrument lubricants or no lubricant (n=10). Hardness was remeasured after finishing with a series of contouring and polishing discs. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test at 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences (p<0.001) in flexural strength and stiffness among groups. While strength and stiffness were not affected by using a wetting resin as instrument lubricant, use of a universal adhesive increased strength and stiffness significantly, achieving monolithic values. Scanning electron micrographs showed less porosities at the interface when using instrument lubricants. Surface hardness was significantly reduced in groups in which instrument lubricants were used, but finishing/polishing restored original hardness (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lubricating an instrument with a wetting agent did not adversely affect physical or surface properties, provided the surface was finished and polished. If a universal adhesive was used as lubricant, the strength and stiffness of a layered composite could be increased, reaching monolithic values.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Instrument Lubricant on Mechanical Properties of Restorative Composite.\",\"authors\":\"G Pippin, D Tantbirojn, M Wolfgang, J S Nordin, A Versluis\",\"doi\":\"10.2341/23-136-L\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Using a wetting resin or adhesive system as an instrument lubricant when placing composite layers is commonly practiced to improve handling. This study investigated whether instrument lubricants affected strength, stiffness, or hardness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Composite beams (TPH Spectra) were fabricated using a stainless steel mold (25×2.5×2 mm) in two steps, where the second half (12.5 mm) was added and cured against a cured first half (n=15). The composite surface at the open end of the first half was smoothed using an instrument lubricated with wetting resin (Ultradent) or universal adhesive (ScotchBond Universal), enough to prevent sticking, or without lubrication. An additional beam of each group was characterized using scanning electron microscopy. Monolithic specimens were also fabricated. After 24 hour storage (37°C, 100% humidity), the beams' flexural strength and stiffness were determined by four-point bending. Vickers surface hardness was measured on 24-hour composite samples in 2 mm deep acrylic cavities, cured after the surface was smoothed with the two instrument lubricants or no lubricant (n=10). Hardness was remeasured after finishing with a series of contouring and polishing discs. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test at 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences (p<0.001) in flexural strength and stiffness among groups. While strength and stiffness were not affected by using a wetting resin as instrument lubricant, use of a universal adhesive increased strength and stiffness significantly, achieving monolithic values. Scanning electron micrographs showed less porosities at the interface when using instrument lubricants. Surface hardness was significantly reduced in groups in which instrument lubricants were used, but finishing/polishing restored original hardness (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lubricating an instrument with a wetting agent did not adversely affect physical or surface properties, provided the surface was finished and polished. If a universal adhesive was used as lubricant, the strength and stiffness of a layered composite could be increased, reaching monolithic values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2341/23-136-L\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/23-136-L","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在放置复合材料层时,通常会使用润湿树脂或粘合剂系统作为器械润滑剂,以改善操作性。本研究调查了仪器润滑剂是否会影响强度、刚度或硬度:使用不锈钢模具(25×2.5×2 毫米)分两步制作复合材料横梁(TPH Spectra),其中添加后半部分(12.5 毫米)并与固化的前半部分(n=15)进行固化。用一种涂有润湿树脂(Ultradent)或通用粘合剂(ScotchBond Universal)的工具将第一半模开口端的复合材料表面磨平,以防止粘连,或不涂润滑剂。使用扫描电子显微镜对每组的另一个横梁进行表征。还制作了单片试样。存放 24 小时后(37°C,100% 湿度),通过四点弯曲测定横梁的抗弯强度和刚度。在 2 毫米深的丙烯酸空腔中对 24 小时复合材料试样进行维氏硬度测量,在使用两种仪器润滑剂或不使用润滑剂(n=10)平滑表面后固化。使用一系列轮廓和抛光盘进行表面处理后,重新测量硬度。采用方差分析对数据进行统计分析,然后进行Student-Newman-Keuls事后检验,显著性水平为0.05:结果:两者有明显差异(p):用润湿剂润滑仪器不会对仪器的物理或表面特性产生不利影响,前提是对表面进行加工和抛光。如果使用通用粘合剂作为润滑剂,可提高分层复合材料的强度和刚度,使其达到整体值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Instrument Lubricant on Mechanical Properties of Restorative Composite.

Objectives: Using a wetting resin or adhesive system as an instrument lubricant when placing composite layers is commonly practiced to improve handling. This study investigated whether instrument lubricants affected strength, stiffness, or hardness.

Methods: Composite beams (TPH Spectra) were fabricated using a stainless steel mold (25×2.5×2 mm) in two steps, where the second half (12.5 mm) was added and cured against a cured first half (n=15). The composite surface at the open end of the first half was smoothed using an instrument lubricated with wetting resin (Ultradent) or universal adhesive (ScotchBond Universal), enough to prevent sticking, or without lubrication. An additional beam of each group was characterized using scanning electron microscopy. Monolithic specimens were also fabricated. After 24 hour storage (37°C, 100% humidity), the beams' flexural strength and stiffness were determined by four-point bending. Vickers surface hardness was measured on 24-hour composite samples in 2 mm deep acrylic cavities, cured after the surface was smoothed with the two instrument lubricants or no lubricant (n=10). Hardness was remeasured after finishing with a series of contouring and polishing discs. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test at 0.05 significance level.

Results: There were significant differences (p<0.001) in flexural strength and stiffness among groups. While strength and stiffness were not affected by using a wetting resin as instrument lubricant, use of a universal adhesive increased strength and stiffness significantly, achieving monolithic values. Scanning electron micrographs showed less porosities at the interface when using instrument lubricants. Surface hardness was significantly reduced in groups in which instrument lubricants were used, but finishing/polishing restored original hardness (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Lubricating an instrument with a wetting agent did not adversely affect physical or surface properties, provided the surface was finished and polished. If a universal adhesive was used as lubricant, the strength and stiffness of a layered composite could be increased, reaching monolithic values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operative dentistry
Operative dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts. One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use. The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信