Petr Hollý, Tereza Hubená, Martin Čihák, Aneta Pavlíková, David Kemlink, Olga Ulmanová, Jan Rusz, Robert Jech, Radim Krupička, Evžen Růžička
{"title":"估计本质性震颤患者的残疾程度：震颤评分量表、螺旋绘图和加速度震颤力的比较。","authors":"Petr Hollý, Tereza Hubená, Martin Čihák, Aneta Pavlíková, David Kemlink, Olga Ulmanová, Jan Rusz, Robert Jech, Radim Krupička, Evžen Růžička","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R<sup>2</sup>, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.756) were not statistically superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.\",\"authors\":\"Petr Hollý, Tereza Hubená, Martin Čihák, Aneta Pavlíková, David Kemlink, Olga Ulmanová, Jan Rusz, Robert Jech, Radim Krupička, Evžen Růžička\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.14160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R<sup>2</sup>, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.756) were not statistically superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.
Background: Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear.
Objective: The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET).
Methods: Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore.
Results: TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior.
Conclusions: TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.
期刊介绍：
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
