估计本质性震颤患者的残疾程度：震颤评分量表、螺旋绘图和加速度震颤力的比较。

IF 2.6 4区医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1002/mdc3.14160

Petr Hollý, Tereza Hubená, Martin Čihák, Aneta Pavlíková, David Kemlink, Olga Ulmanová, Jan Rusz, Robert Jech, Radim Krupička, Evžen Růžička

{"title":"估计本质性震颤患者的残疾程度：震颤评分量表、螺旋绘图和加速度震颤力的比较。","authors":"Petr Hollý, Tereza Hubená, Martin Čihák, Aneta Pavlíková, David Kemlink, Olga Ulmanová, Jan Rusz, Robert Jech, Radim Krupička, Evžen Růžička","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear.Objective: The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET).Methods: Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore.Results: TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior.Conclusions: TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1582-1586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.\",\"authors\":\"Petr Hollý, Tereza Hubená, Martin Čihák, Aneta Pavlíková, David Kemlink, Olga Ulmanová, Jan Rusz, Robert Jech, Radim Krupička, Evžen Růžička\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.14160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear.Objective: The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET).Methods: Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore.Results: TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior.Conclusions: TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1582-1586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647970/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：虽然性能评分量表、螺旋绘图、倒水和加速度测量法常用于评估震颤的严重程度，但其结果与日常生活活动（ADL）障碍的相关程度仍不清楚：目的：旨在确定本质性震颤（ET）中最有效的 ADL 预测指标：方法：使用本质性震颤分级评估量表（TETRAS）、螺旋画法、泼水量和加速度震颤功率对 40 名本质性震颤患者进行了检查。计算了预测 TETRAS ADL 子量表模型的均方根误差、R2 和 F 检验：结果：TETRAS 表现分量表可以解释 TETRAS ADL 的变异性，R2 值为 0.686。包含螺旋评分和加速度震颤力（R2 = 0.731）以及溢水量（R2 = 0.756）的模型在统计学上并不占优：结论：TETRAS表现子分数可预测ET患者近70%的ADL损伤。结论：TETRAS表现子评分可预测ET患者近70%的ADL损伤，但纳入螺旋评分、加速度震颤力和倒水测试并不能提高ADL预测能力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.

Background: Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear.

Objective: The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET).

Methods: Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R², and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore.

Results: TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R² value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R² = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R² = 0.756) were not statistically superior.

Conclusions: TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

7.50%

发文量

218

期刊介绍： Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)