耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌引起血流感染的风险因素:一项巢式病例对照研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hongyu Zhou, Niccolò Buetti, Salvador Pérez-Galera, Jose Bravo-Ferrer, Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, María Paniagua-García, Jan Feifel, Julien Sauser, Tomi Kostyanev, Rafael Canton, Lionel K Tan, Dimitris Basoulis, Vicente Pintado, Emmanuel Roilides, Gorana Dragovac, Julian Torre-Cisneros, Deana Mediç, Murat Akova, Herman Goossens, Marc Bonten, Stephan Harbarth, Jesus Rodriguez-Baño, Marlieke E A De Kraker
{"title":"耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌引起血流感染的风险因素:一项巢式病例对照研究。","authors":"Hongyu Zhou, Niccolò Buetti, Salvador Pérez-Galera, Jose Bravo-Ferrer, Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, María Paniagua-García, Jan Feifel, Julien Sauser, Tomi Kostyanev, Rafael Canton, Lionel K Tan, Dimitris Basoulis, Vicente Pintado, Emmanuel Roilides, Gorana Dragovac, Julian Torre-Cisneros, Deana Mediç, Murat Akova, Herman Goossens, Marc Bonten, Stephan Harbarth, Jesus Rodriguez-Baño, Marlieke E A De Kraker","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkae157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major threat to patients. To date, data on risk factors have been limited, with low internal and external validity. In this multicentre study, risk factors for CRE BSI were determined by comparison with two control groups: patients with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) BSI, and patients without Enterobacterales infection (uninfected patients).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre, case-control-control study was nested in a European prospective cohort study on CRE (EURECA). CRE BSI:CSE BSI matching was 1:1, CRE BSI:Uninfected patients matching was 1:3, based on hospital, ward and length of stay. Conditional logistic regression was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March 2016 to November 2018, 73 CRE BSIs, 73 CSE BSIs and 219 uninfected patients were included from 18 European hospitals. For CRE versus CSE BSI, previous CRE colonization/infection [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 7.32; 95% CI 1.65-32.38) increased the risk. For CRE versus uninfected controls, independent risk factors included: older age (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06), patient referral (long-term care facility: IRR 7.19; 95% CI 1.51-34.24; acute care hospital: IRR 5.26; 95% CI 1.61-17.11), previous colonization/infection with other MDR organisms (MDROs) (IRR 9.71; 95% CI 2.33-40.56), haemodialysis (IRR 8.59; 95% CI 1.82-40.53), invasive procedures (IRR 5.66; 95% CI 2.11-15.16), and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (IRR 3.92; 95% CI 1.68-9.13) or third/fourth generation cephalosporin (IRR 2.75; 95% CI 1.06-7.11) exposure within 3 months before enrolment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence of previous CRE colonization/infection was a major risk factor for carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales BSI. Compared with uninfected patients, evidence of previous MDRO colonization/infection and healthcare exposure were important risk factors for CRE BSI. Targeted screening, infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship should focus on these high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: a nested case-control-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Hongyu Zhou, Niccolò Buetti, Salvador Pérez-Galera, Jose Bravo-Ferrer, Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, María Paniagua-García, Jan Feifel, Julien Sauser, Tomi Kostyanev, Rafael Canton, Lionel K Tan, Dimitris Basoulis, Vicente Pintado, Emmanuel Roilides, Gorana Dragovac, Julian Torre-Cisneros, Deana Mediç, Murat Akova, Herman Goossens, Marc Bonten, Stephan Harbarth, Jesus Rodriguez-Baño, Marlieke E A De Kraker\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkae157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major threat to patients. To date, data on risk factors have been limited, with low internal and external validity. In this multicentre study, risk factors for CRE BSI were determined by comparison with two control groups: patients with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) BSI, and patients without Enterobacterales infection (uninfected patients).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre, case-control-control study was nested in a European prospective cohort study on CRE (EURECA). CRE BSI:CSE BSI matching was 1:1, CRE BSI:Uninfected patients matching was 1:3, based on hospital, ward and length of stay. Conditional logistic regression was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March 2016 to November 2018, 73 CRE BSIs, 73 CSE BSIs and 219 uninfected patients were included from 18 European hospitals. For CRE versus CSE BSI, previous CRE colonization/infection [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 7.32; 95% CI 1.65-32.38) increased the risk. For CRE versus uninfected controls, independent risk factors included: older age (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06), patient referral (long-term care facility: IRR 7.19; 95% CI 1.51-34.24; acute care hospital: IRR 5.26; 95% CI 1.61-17.11), previous colonization/infection with other MDR organisms (MDROs) (IRR 9.71; 95% CI 2.33-40.56), haemodialysis (IRR 8.59; 95% CI 1.82-40.53), invasive procedures (IRR 5.66; 95% CI 2.11-15.16), and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (IRR 3.92; 95% CI 1.68-9.13) or third/fourth generation cephalosporin (IRR 2.75; 95% CI 1.06-7.11) exposure within 3 months before enrolment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence of previous CRE colonization/infection was a major risk factor for carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales BSI. Compared with uninfected patients, evidence of previous MDRO colonization/infection and healthcare exposure were important risk factors for CRE BSI. Targeted screening, infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship should focus on these high-risk patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae157\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkae157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)血流感染(BSI)是对患者的一大威胁。迄今为止,有关风险因素的数据十分有限,内部和外部有效性都很低。在这项多中心研究中,通过与两个对照组(碳青霉烯类易感肠杆菌(CSE)BSI 患者和无肠杆菌感染患者(未感染患者))进行比较,确定了 CRE BSI 的风险因素:多中心病例对照研究嵌套于欧洲 CRE 前瞻性队列研究(EURECA)中。根据医院、病房和住院时间,CRE BSI 与 CSE BSI 的匹配比例为 1:1,CRE BSI 与未感染患者的匹配比例为 1:3。应用条件逻辑回归:2016年3月至2018年11月,欧洲18家医院共纳入73例CRE BSI、73例CSE BSI和219例未感染患者。对于CRE与CSE BSI,既往CRE定植/感染[发病率比(IRR)7.32;95% CI 1.65-32.38]增加了风险。对于 CRE 与未感染对照组,独立风险因素包括:年龄较大(IRR 1.03;95% CI 1.01-1.06)、患者转诊(长期护理机构:IRR为7.19;95% CI为1.51-34.24;急症护理医院:IRR为5.26;95% CI为1.61-17.11)、既往定植/感染其他MDR生物(MDROs)(IRR为9.71;95% CI为2.33-40.56)、血液透析(IRR为8.59;95% CI为1.82-40.53)、侵入性程序(IRR为5.66;95% CI为2.11-15.16)、β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(IRR 3.92;95% CI 1.68-9.13)或入组前 3 个月内接触过第三代/第四代头孢菌素(IRR 2.75;95% CI 1.06-7.11):在肠杆菌 BSI 中,既往 CRE 定植/感染的证据是碳青霉烯耐药的主要风险因素。与未感染的患者相比,既往MDRO定植/感染证据和医疗接触是CRE BSI的重要风险因素。有针对性的筛查、感染预防和抗菌药物管理应重点关注这些高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factors for bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: a nested case-control-control study.

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major threat to patients. To date, data on risk factors have been limited, with low internal and external validity. In this multicentre study, risk factors for CRE BSI were determined by comparison with two control groups: patients with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) BSI, and patients without Enterobacterales infection (uninfected patients).

Methods: A multicentre, case-control-control study was nested in a European prospective cohort study on CRE (EURECA). CRE BSI:CSE BSI matching was 1:1, CRE BSI:Uninfected patients matching was 1:3, based on hospital, ward and length of stay. Conditional logistic regression was applied.

Results: From March 2016 to November 2018, 73 CRE BSIs, 73 CSE BSIs and 219 uninfected patients were included from 18 European hospitals. For CRE versus CSE BSI, previous CRE colonization/infection [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 7.32; 95% CI 1.65-32.38) increased the risk. For CRE versus uninfected controls, independent risk factors included: older age (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06), patient referral (long-term care facility: IRR 7.19; 95% CI 1.51-34.24; acute care hospital: IRR 5.26; 95% CI 1.61-17.11), previous colonization/infection with other MDR organisms (MDROs) (IRR 9.71; 95% CI 2.33-40.56), haemodialysis (IRR 8.59; 95% CI 1.82-40.53), invasive procedures (IRR 5.66; 95% CI 2.11-15.16), and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (IRR 3.92; 95% CI 1.68-9.13) or third/fourth generation cephalosporin (IRR 2.75; 95% CI 1.06-7.11) exposure within 3 months before enrolment.

Conclusions: Evidence of previous CRE colonization/infection was a major risk factor for carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales BSI. Compared with uninfected patients, evidence of previous MDRO colonization/infection and healthcare exposure were important risk factors for CRE BSI. Targeted screening, infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship should focus on these high-risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信