Qinggang Yuan, Lixiang Liu, Kai Wang, Shizhen Zhou, Ji Miao, Bo Gao, Chao Ding, Wenxian Guan
{"title":"开发并验证用于预测结直肠癌根治术后预后的 \"改良痛觉缺失指数\"。","authors":"Qinggang Yuan, Lixiang Liu, Kai Wang, Shizhen Zhou, Ji Miao, Bo Gao, Chao Ding, Wenxian Guan","doi":"10.1038/s41430-024-01469-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was reported that the cachexia index (CXI: $$\\frac{{\\rm{ALB}}* {\\rm{SMI}}}{{\\rm{NLR}}}$$ ) was an essential index for predicting the prognosis of tumor patients. However, since for SMI needs to be measured by CT imaging methods and its calculation was inconvenient. Thus, we developed a modified cachexia index (mCXI: $$\\frac{{\\rm{ALB}}}{{\\rm{NLR}}* {\\rm{UCR}}}$$ ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between mCXI and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. An analysis of 215 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer was carried out retrospectively. An optimal cut-off value of mCXI was established by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting prognosis. Prognostic implications of mCXI were investigated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. A comparative assessment of the predictive capacity between mCXI and the CXI was performed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis. Patients were classified into two groups based on the cut-off value of mCXI: the LOW mCXI group (n = 60) and the HIGH mCXI group (n = 155). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) (76.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.01) and 3-year Recurrence-free survival (RFS) (68.3% vs 94.1%, p < 0.01) were significantly worse in the LOW mCXI group in contrast to that in the HIGH mCXI group. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, mCXI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 8.951, 95%CI: 3.105–25.807, <0.01). Moreover, compared with CXI (AUC = 0.723), mCXI (AUC = 0.801) has better predictive efficacy, indicating that mCXI is more suitable for prognostic assessment. The mCXI significantly correlated with survival outcomes for colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery.","PeriodicalId":11927,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":"78 10","pages":"880-886"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and validating a Modified Cachexia Index to predict the outcomes for colorectal cancer after radical surgery\",\"authors\":\"Qinggang Yuan, Lixiang Liu, Kai Wang, Shizhen Zhou, Ji Miao, Bo Gao, Chao Ding, Wenxian Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41430-024-01469-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was reported that the cachexia index (CXI: $$\\\\frac{{\\\\rm{ALB}}* {\\\\rm{SMI}}}{{\\\\rm{NLR}}}$$ ) was an essential index for predicting the prognosis of tumor patients. However, since for SMI needs to be measured by CT imaging methods and its calculation was inconvenient. Thus, we developed a modified cachexia index (mCXI: $$\\\\frac{{\\\\rm{ALB}}}{{\\\\rm{NLR}}* {\\\\rm{UCR}}}$$ ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between mCXI and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. An analysis of 215 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer was carried out retrospectively. An optimal cut-off value of mCXI was established by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting prognosis. Prognostic implications of mCXI were investigated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. A comparative assessment of the predictive capacity between mCXI and the CXI was performed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis. Patients were classified into two groups based on the cut-off value of mCXI: the LOW mCXI group (n = 60) and the HIGH mCXI group (n = 155). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) (76.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.01) and 3-year Recurrence-free survival (RFS) (68.3% vs 94.1%, p < 0.01) were significantly worse in the LOW mCXI group in contrast to that in the HIGH mCXI group. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, mCXI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 8.951, 95%CI: 3.105–25.807, <0.01). Moreover, compared with CXI (AUC = 0.723), mCXI (AUC = 0.801) has better predictive efficacy, indicating that mCXI is more suitable for prognostic assessment. The mCXI significantly correlated with survival outcomes for colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"78 10\",\"pages\":\"880-886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458475/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-024-01469-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41430-024-01469-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing and validating a Modified Cachexia Index to predict the outcomes for colorectal cancer after radical surgery
It was reported that the cachexia index (CXI: $$\frac{{\rm{ALB}}* {\rm{SMI}}}{{\rm{NLR}}}$$ ) was an essential index for predicting the prognosis of tumor patients. However, since for SMI needs to be measured by CT imaging methods and its calculation was inconvenient. Thus, we developed a modified cachexia index (mCXI: $$\frac{{\rm{ALB}}}{{\rm{NLR}}* {\rm{UCR}}}$$ ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between mCXI and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. An analysis of 215 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer was carried out retrospectively. An optimal cut-off value of mCXI was established by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting prognosis. Prognostic implications of mCXI were investigated using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. A comparative assessment of the predictive capacity between mCXI and the CXI was performed using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis. Patients were classified into two groups based on the cut-off value of mCXI: the LOW mCXI group (n = 60) and the HIGH mCXI group (n = 155). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) (76.6% vs 96.7%, p < 0.01) and 3-year Recurrence-free survival (RFS) (68.3% vs 94.1%, p < 0.01) were significantly worse in the LOW mCXI group in contrast to that in the HIGH mCXI group. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, mCXI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 8.951, 95%CI: 3.105–25.807, <0.01). Moreover, compared with CXI (AUC = 0.723), mCXI (AUC = 0.801) has better predictive efficacy, indicating that mCXI is more suitable for prognostic assessment. The mCXI significantly correlated with survival outcomes for colorectal cancer patients after radical surgery.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (EJCN) is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of human and clinical nutrition. The journal welcomes original research, reviews, case reports and brief communications based on clinical, metabolic and epidemiological studies that describe methodologies, mechanisms, associations and benefits of nutritional interventions for clinical disease and health promotion.
Topics of interest include but are not limited to:
Nutrition and Health (including climate and ecological aspects)
Metabolism & Metabolomics
Genomics and personalized strategies in nutrition
Nutrition during the early life cycle
Health issues and nutrition in the elderly
Phenotyping in clinical nutrition
Nutrition in acute and chronic diseases
The double burden of ''malnutrition'': Under-nutrition and Obesity
Prevention of Non Communicable Diseases (NCD)