影响遵守术前心脏检查建议的因素:一项队列研究。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002039
Alexandra Stroda, Tanja Sulot, Sebastian Roth, René M'Pembele, Eckhard Mauermann, Daniela Ionescu, Wojciech Szczeklik, Stefan De Hert, Miodrag Filipovic, Beatrice Beck Schimmer, Savino Spadaro, Purificación Matute, Sanem Cakar Turhan, Judith van Waes, Filipa Lagarto, Kassiani Theodoraki, Anil Gupta, Hans-Jörg Gillmann, Luca Guzzetti, Katarzyna Kotfis, Jan Larmann, Dan Corneci, Simon J Howell, Giovanna Lurati Buse
{"title":"影响遵守术前心脏检查建议的因素:一项队列研究。","authors":"Alexandra Stroda, Tanja Sulot, Sebastian Roth, René M'Pembele, Eckhard Mauermann, Daniela Ionescu, Wojciech Szczeklik, Stefan De Hert, Miodrag Filipovic, Beatrice Beck Schimmer, Savino Spadaro, Purificación Matute, Sanem Cakar Turhan, Judith van Waes, Filipa Lagarto, Kassiani Theodoraki, Anil Gupta, Hans-Jörg Gillmann, Luca Guzzetti, Katarzyna Kotfis, Jan Larmann, Dan Corneci, Simon J Howell, Giovanna Lurati Buse","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac risk evaluation prior to noncardiac surgery is fundamental to tailor peri-operative management to patient's estimated risk. Data on the degree of adherence to guidelines in patients at cardiovascular risk in Europe and factors influencing adherence are underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this analysis was to describe the degree of adherence to [2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) guidelines] recommendations on rest echocardiography [transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)] and to stress imaging prior to noncardiac surgery in a large European sample and to assess factors potentially affecting adherence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study (MET-REPAIR).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-five European centres of all levels of care that enrolled patients between 2017 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>With elevated cardiovascular risk undergoing in-hospital elective, noncardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>(Non)adherence to each pre-operative TTE and stress imaging recommendations classified as guideline-adherent, overuse and underuse. We performed descriptive analysis. To explore the impact of patients' sex, age, geographical region, and hospital teaching status, we conducted multivariate multinominal regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 15 983 patients, 15 529 were analysed (61% men, mean age 72 ± 8 years). Overuse (conduction in spite of class III) and underuse (nonconduction in spite of class I recommendation) for pre-operative TTE amounted to 16.6% (2542/15 344) and 6.6% (1015/15 344), respectively. Stress imaging overuse and underuse amounted to 1.7% (241/14 202) and 0.4% (52/14 202) respectively. Male sex, some age categories and some geographical regions were significantly associated with TTE overuse. Male sex and some regions were also associated with TTE underuse. Age and regions were associated with overuse of stress imaging. Male sex, age, and some regions were associated with stress imaging underuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to pre-operative stress imaging recommendation was high. In contrast, adherence to TTE recommendations was moderate. Both patients' and geographical factors affected adherence to joint ESC/ESA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT03016936.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"695-704"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting adherence to recommendations on pre-operative cardiac testing: A cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Stroda, Tanja Sulot, Sebastian Roth, René M'Pembele, Eckhard Mauermann, Daniela Ionescu, Wojciech Szczeklik, Stefan De Hert, Miodrag Filipovic, Beatrice Beck Schimmer, Savino Spadaro, Purificación Matute, Sanem Cakar Turhan, Judith van Waes, Filipa Lagarto, Kassiani Theodoraki, Anil Gupta, Hans-Jörg Gillmann, Luca Guzzetti, Katarzyna Kotfis, Jan Larmann, Dan Corneci, Simon J Howell, Giovanna Lurati Buse\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac risk evaluation prior to noncardiac surgery is fundamental to tailor peri-operative management to patient's estimated risk. Data on the degree of adherence to guidelines in patients at cardiovascular risk in Europe and factors influencing adherence are underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this analysis was to describe the degree of adherence to [2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) guidelines] recommendations on rest echocardiography [transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)] and to stress imaging prior to noncardiac surgery in a large European sample and to assess factors potentially affecting adherence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study (MET-REPAIR).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-five European centres of all levels of care that enrolled patients between 2017 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>With elevated cardiovascular risk undergoing in-hospital elective, noncardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>(Non)adherence to each pre-operative TTE and stress imaging recommendations classified as guideline-adherent, overuse and underuse. We performed descriptive analysis. To explore the impact of patients' sex, age, geographical region, and hospital teaching status, we conducted multivariate multinominal regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 15 983 patients, 15 529 were analysed (61% men, mean age 72 ± 8 years). Overuse (conduction in spite of class III) and underuse (nonconduction in spite of class I recommendation) for pre-operative TTE amounted to 16.6% (2542/15 344) and 6.6% (1015/15 344), respectively. Stress imaging overuse and underuse amounted to 1.7% (241/14 202) and 0.4% (52/14 202) respectively. Male sex, some age categories and some geographical regions were significantly associated with TTE overuse. Male sex and some regions were also associated with TTE underuse. Age and regions were associated with overuse of stress imaging. Male sex, age, and some regions were associated with stress imaging underuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to pre-operative stress imaging recommendation was high. In contrast, adherence to TTE recommendations was moderate. Both patients' and geographical factors affected adherence to joint ESC/ESA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT03016936.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"695-704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002039\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非心脏手术前的心脏风险评估是根据患者的估计风险调整围手术期管理的基础。有关欧洲心血管风险患者遵守指南的程度以及影响遵守指南的因素的数据尚未得到充分探讨:本分析旨在描述欧洲大样本非心脏手术前对[2014 年欧洲心脏病学会 (ESC)/ 欧洲麻醉学会 (ESA) 指南]关于静息超声心动图[经胸超声心动图 (TTE)]和负荷成像建议的遵循程度,并评估可能影响遵循程度的因素:对一项多中心、国际性、前瞻性队列研究(MET-REPAIR)进行二次分析:25个欧洲各级医疗中心,在2017年至2020年间招募患者:主要结果测量指标:(对每项术前 TTE 和压力成像建议的(不)遵守情况,分为遵守指南、过度使用和使用不足。我们进行了描述性分析。为了探讨患者性别、年龄、地理区域和医院教学状况的影响,我们进行了多变量多项式回归分析:在 15 983 名患者中,有 15 529 人接受了分析(61% 为男性,平均年龄为 72 ± 8 岁)。术前 TTE 的过度使用(尽管达到 III 级,但仍有导通性)和使用不足(尽管达到 I 级,但仍无导通性)分别占 16.6%(2542/15 344)和 6.6%(1015/15 344)。压力成像过度使用和使用不足的比例分别为 1.7%(241/14 202)和 0.4%(52/14 202)。男性性别、某些年龄段和某些地理区域与 TTE 过度使用明显相关。男性性别和某些地区也与 TTE 使用不足有关。年龄和地区与压力成像过度使用有关。男性性别、年龄和某些地区与压力成像使用不足有关:结论:对术前压力成像建议的依从性很高。结论:对术前压力成像建议的依从性较高,而对 TTE 建议的依从性一般。患者和地理因素都会影响ESC/ESA联合指南的遵循情况:试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT03016936。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting adherence to recommendations on pre-operative cardiac testing: A cohort study.

Background: Cardiac risk evaluation prior to noncardiac surgery is fundamental to tailor peri-operative management to patient's estimated risk. Data on the degree of adherence to guidelines in patients at cardiovascular risk in Europe and factors influencing adherence are underexplored.

Objectives: The aim of this analysis was to describe the degree of adherence to [2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) guidelines] recommendations on rest echocardiography [transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)] and to stress imaging prior to noncardiac surgery in a large European sample and to assess factors potentially affecting adherence.

Design: Secondary analysis of a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study (MET-REPAIR).

Setting: Twenty-five European centres of all levels of care that enrolled patients between 2017 and 2020.

Patients: With elevated cardiovascular risk undergoing in-hospital elective, noncardiac surgery.

Main outcome measures: (Non)adherence to each pre-operative TTE and stress imaging recommendations classified as guideline-adherent, overuse and underuse. We performed descriptive analysis. To explore the impact of patients' sex, age, geographical region, and hospital teaching status, we conducted multivariate multinominal regression analysis.

Results: Out of 15 983 patients, 15 529 were analysed (61% men, mean age 72 ± 8 years). Overuse (conduction in spite of class III) and underuse (nonconduction in spite of class I recommendation) for pre-operative TTE amounted to 16.6% (2542/15 344) and 6.6% (1015/15 344), respectively. Stress imaging overuse and underuse amounted to 1.7% (241/14 202) and 0.4% (52/14 202) respectively. Male sex, some age categories and some geographical regions were significantly associated with TTE overuse. Male sex and some regions were also associated with TTE underuse. Age and regions were associated with overuse of stress imaging. Male sex, age, and some regions were associated with stress imaging underuse.

Conclusion: Adherence to pre-operative stress imaging recommendation was high. In contrast, adherence to TTE recommendations was moderate. Both patients' and geographical factors affected adherence to joint ESC/ESA guidelines.

Trial registration: NCT03016936.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信