合同时机成熟?估算牛油果生产者组织合同种植干预措施的影响

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Philipp Kollenda, Daniella Brals, Jane Kabubo-Mariara, Remco Oostendorp, Menno Pradhan, Fedes van Rijn
{"title":"合同时机成熟?估算牛油果生产者组织合同种植干预措施的影响","authors":"Philipp Kollenda,&nbsp;Daniella Brals,&nbsp;Jane Kabubo-Mariara,&nbsp;Remco Oostendorp,&nbsp;Menno Pradhan,&nbsp;Fedes van Rijn","doi":"10.1111/agec.12848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We evaluate the impact of a producer organization avocado contract farming intervention in Kenya that included (1) an agreement to sell to an avocado exporting company, (2) access to training, and (3) support to gain group-level Global Good Agricultural Practices (<i>GLOBALG.A.P</i>.) certification as main activities. Using a (nonexperimental) doubly robust difference-in-differences design with farm-level panel data from 2015 and 2017, we show that farmers began selling to the contracted company, were recently trained and received the <i>GLOBALG.A.P</i>. certification. However, the intervention's uptake was less than perfect, especially concerning the procurement aspect of the contract, suggesting widespread side selling. In terms of outcomes, contract farming nevertheless significantly improved sales prices and reported quality, increased direct sales to companies, and led to more planted trees, but also increased total production costs. The effects are driven by the Hass avocado variety, which is in higher demand in export markets and the contracted avocado variety. No significant income and other welfare effects were found.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.12848","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ripe for contracts? Estimating the impact of an avocado producer organization contract farming intervention\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Kollenda,&nbsp;Daniella Brals,&nbsp;Jane Kabubo-Mariara,&nbsp;Remco Oostendorp,&nbsp;Menno Pradhan,&nbsp;Fedes van Rijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/agec.12848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We evaluate the impact of a producer organization avocado contract farming intervention in Kenya that included (1) an agreement to sell to an avocado exporting company, (2) access to training, and (3) support to gain group-level Global Good Agricultural Practices (<i>GLOBALG.A.P</i>.) certification as main activities. Using a (nonexperimental) doubly robust difference-in-differences design with farm-level panel data from 2015 and 2017, we show that farmers began selling to the contracted company, were recently trained and received the <i>GLOBALG.A.P</i>. certification. However, the intervention's uptake was less than perfect, especially concerning the procurement aspect of the contract, suggesting widespread side selling. In terms of outcomes, contract farming nevertheless significantly improved sales prices and reported quality, increased direct sales to companies, and led to more planted trees, but also increased total production costs. The effects are driven by the Hass avocado variety, which is in higher demand in export markets and the contracted avocado variety. No significant income and other welfare effects were found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.12848\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.12848\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.12848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了肯尼亚生产者组织牛油果合同种植干预措施的影响,其中包括:(1)向牛油果出口公司销售的协议;(2)获得培训的机会;以及(3)作为主要活动的获得团体级全球良好农业规范(GLOBALG.A.P.)认证的支持。我们利用 2015 年和 2017 年的农场面板数据,采用(非实验性)双重稳健差分设计,表明农民开始向签约公司销售,最近接受了培训,并获得了 GLOBALG.A.P. 认证。然而,干预措施的吸收并不完美,尤其是在合同的采购方面,这表明副业销售普遍存在。从结果来看,合同种植还是显著提高了销售价格和报告质量,增加了对公司的直接销售,种植了更多的树木,但也增加了总生产成本。影响主要来自出口市场需求量较大的哈斯鳄梨品种和合同种植的鳄梨品种。没有发现明显的收入和其他福利效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ripe for contracts? Estimating the impact of an avocado producer organization contract farming intervention

We evaluate the impact of a producer organization avocado contract farming intervention in Kenya that included (1) an agreement to sell to an avocado exporting company, (2) access to training, and (3) support to gain group-level Global Good Agricultural Practices (GLOBALG.A.P.) certification as main activities. Using a (nonexperimental) doubly robust difference-in-differences design with farm-level panel data from 2015 and 2017, we show that farmers began selling to the contracted company, were recently trained and received the GLOBALG.A.P. certification. However, the intervention's uptake was less than perfect, especially concerning the procurement aspect of the contract, suggesting widespread side selling. In terms of outcomes, contract farming nevertheless significantly improved sales prices and reported quality, increased direct sales to companies, and led to more planted trees, but also increased total production costs. The effects are driven by the Hass avocado variety, which is in higher demand in export markets and the contracted avocado variety. No significant income and other welfare effects were found.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信