{"title":"牛奶的博爱:德里达未发表的研讨会《Manger l'autre》(1989-1990 年)中的主权与食人癖","authors":"Valeria Campos-Salvaterra","doi":"10.1163/15691640-12341544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the unpublished seminars given in the United States and France between 1989–1991, <em>Manger l’autre: Politiques de l’Amitié</em> and <em>Rhétoriques du Cannibalisme</em>, Derrida analyzes the rhetorical function that the act of eating has in the Western tradition’s philosophical texts. In this paper I analyze the reading Derrida makes in those seminars of Saint Augustine’s Confessions, in order to show that they are entangled with a critique of political sovereignty. For Derrida, Augustine has a cogito of his own, which is a cogito <em>du manger l’autre</em>. Augustine’s formulation is “I think, eat and drink” (<em>ego cogito, manduco et bibo</em>), and Derrida understands it as a way of constituting both the self of the ego and the self of the community. The first form of Christian community configured through the intake of food is the fraternity of milk: infants that suck the same milk from the breast of their nurse or mother. The second configuration of the community is, of course, the sacrament of Eucharist, in which the body of the father is divided (<em>partagé</em>) among the brothers. I show how the analysis Derrida makes of Augustine in these seminars is a way of deconstructing the very concept of community and its relation to sovereignty. This is attempted by Derrida through the problem of jealousy: the brothers of milk will always be jealous of each other, being themselves the condition for the breaking of the community and their sovereignty. But the second form of community is also threatened by food: since the holy wafer is an edible thing and the act of incorporation of food is really an act of theophagy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44158,"journal":{"name":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fraternity of Milk: Sovereignty and Anthropotheophagy in Derrida’s Unpublished Seminar Manger l’autre (1989–1990)\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Campos-Salvaterra\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15691640-12341544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the unpublished seminars given in the United States and France between 1989–1991, <em>Manger l’autre: Politiques de l’Amitié</em> and <em>Rhétoriques du Cannibalisme</em>, Derrida analyzes the rhetorical function that the act of eating has in the Western tradition’s philosophical texts. In this paper I analyze the reading Derrida makes in those seminars of Saint Augustine’s Confessions, in order to show that they are entangled with a critique of political sovereignty. For Derrida, Augustine has a cogito of his own, which is a cogito <em>du manger l’autre</em>. Augustine’s formulation is “I think, eat and drink” (<em>ego cogito, manduco et bibo</em>), and Derrida understands it as a way of constituting both the self of the ego and the self of the community. The first form of Christian community configured through the intake of food is the fraternity of milk: infants that suck the same milk from the breast of their nurse or mother. The second configuration of the community is, of course, the sacrament of Eucharist, in which the body of the father is divided (<em>partagé</em>) among the brothers. I show how the analysis Derrida makes of Augustine in these seminars is a way of deconstructing the very concept of community and its relation to sovereignty. This is attempted by Derrida through the problem of jealousy: the brothers of milk will always be jealous of each other, being themselves the condition for the breaking of the community and their sovereignty. But the second form of community is also threatened by food: since the holy wafer is an edible thing and the act of incorporation of food is really an act of theophagy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341544\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在 1989-1991 年间于美国和法国举办的未出版研讨会《Manger l'autre:Politiques de l'Amitié 和 Rhétoriques du Cannibalisme》中,德里达分析了进食行为在西方传统哲学文本中的修辞功能。在本文中,我分析了德里达在这些研讨会上对圣奥古斯丁的《忏悔录》所做的解读,以说明它们与政治主权批判纠缠在一起。在德里达看来,奥古斯丁有一个自己的 "cogito",即 "cogito du manger l'autre"。奥古斯丁的表述是 "我思、我食、我饮"(ego cogito, manduco et bibo),德里达将其理解为一种同时构成自我的自我和共同体的自我的方式。通过摄取食物构成的第一种基督教团体形式是牛奶兄弟会:婴儿从他们的奶妈或母亲的乳房中吮吸同样的牛奶。共同体的第二种形式当然是圣餐圣礼,在圣餐圣礼中,父亲的身体被兄弟们分割(partagé)。我将说明德里达在这些研讨会上对奥古斯丁的分析是如何解构共同体的概念及其与主权的关系的。德里达试图通过妒忌问题来达到这一目的:牛奶兄弟总是相互妒忌,他们本身就是打破共同体及其主权的条件。但是,第二种形式的共同体也受到了食物的威胁:因为圣饼是一种可食用的东西,融入食物的行为实际上是一种食神行为。
The Fraternity of Milk: Sovereignty and Anthropotheophagy in Derrida’s Unpublished Seminar Manger l’autre (1989–1990)
In the unpublished seminars given in the United States and France between 1989–1991, Manger l’autre: Politiques de l’Amitié and Rhétoriques du Cannibalisme, Derrida analyzes the rhetorical function that the act of eating has in the Western tradition’s philosophical texts. In this paper I analyze the reading Derrida makes in those seminars of Saint Augustine’s Confessions, in order to show that they are entangled with a critique of political sovereignty. For Derrida, Augustine has a cogito of his own, which is a cogito du manger l’autre. Augustine’s formulation is “I think, eat and drink” (ego cogito, manduco et bibo), and Derrida understands it as a way of constituting both the self of the ego and the self of the community. The first form of Christian community configured through the intake of food is the fraternity of milk: infants that suck the same milk from the breast of their nurse or mother. The second configuration of the community is, of course, the sacrament of Eucharist, in which the body of the father is divided (partagé) among the brothers. I show how the analysis Derrida makes of Augustine in these seminars is a way of deconstructing the very concept of community and its relation to sovereignty. This is attempted by Derrida through the problem of jealousy: the brothers of milk will always be jealous of each other, being themselves the condition for the breaking of the community and their sovereignty. But the second form of community is also threatened by food: since the holy wafer is an edible thing and the act of incorporation of food is really an act of theophagy.
期刊介绍:
Research in Phenomenology deals with phenomenological philosophy in a broad sense, including original phenomenological research, critical and interpretative studies of major phenomenological thinkers, studies relating phenomenological philosophy to other disciplines, and historical studies of special relevance to phenomenological philosophy.