通过评估进行投票的概况概率模型

IF 0.5 4区经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS

Social Choice and Welfare Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s00355-024-01535-0

Antoine Rolland, Jean-Baptiste Aubin, Irène Gannaz, Samuela Leoni

{"title":"通过评估进行投票的概况概率模型","authors":"Antoine Rolland, Jean-Baptiste Aubin, Irène Gannaz, Samuela Leoni","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01535-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Considering voting rules based on evaluation inputs rather than preference rankings modifies the paradigm of probabilistic studies of voting procedures. This article proposes several simulation models for generating evaluation-based voting inputs. These models can cope with dependent and non identical marginal distributions of the evaluations received by the candidates. A last part is devoted to fitting these models to real data sets.</p>","PeriodicalId":47663,"journal":{"name":"Social Choice and Welfare","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilistic models of profiles for voting by evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Rolland, Jean-Baptiste Aubin, Irène Gannaz, Samuela Leoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00355-024-01535-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Considering voting rules based on evaluation inputs rather than preference rankings modifies the paradigm of probabilistic studies of voting procedures. This article proposes several simulation models for generating evaluation-based voting inputs. These models can cope with dependent and non identical marginal distributions of the evaluations received by the candidates. A last part is devoted to fitting these models to real data sets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Choice and Welfare\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Choice and Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-024-01535-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Choice and Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-024-01535-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑基于评价输入而非偏好排名的投票规则，改变了投票程序的概率研究范式。本文提出了几种模拟模型，用于生成基于评价的投票输入。这些模型可以处理候选人所获评价的依赖性和非完全相同的边际分布。最后一部分专门讨论了将这些模型与真实数据集进行拟合的问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Probabilistic models of profiles for voting by evaluation

查看原文本刊更多论文

Probabilistic models of profiles for voting by evaluation

Considering voting rules based on evaluation inputs rather than preference rankings modifies the paradigm of probabilistic studies of voting procedures. This article proposes several simulation models for generating evaluation-based voting inputs. These models can cope with dependent and non identical marginal distributions of the evaluations received by the candidates. A last part is devoted to fitting these models to real data sets.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social Choice and Welfare Multiple-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Choice and Welfare explores all aspects, both normative and positive, of welfare economics, collective choice, and strategic interaction. Topics include but are not limited to: preference aggregation, welfare criteria, fairness, justice and equity, rights, inequality and poverty measurement, voting and elections, political games, coalition formation, public goods, mechanism design, networks, matching, optimal taxation, cost-benefit analysis, computational social choice, judgement aggregation, market design, behavioral welfare economics, subjective well-being studies and experimental investigations related to social choice and voting. As such, the journal is inter-disciplinary and cuts across the boundaries of economics, political science, philosophy, and mathematics. Articles on choice and order theory that include results that can be applied to the above topics are also included in the journal. While it emphasizes theory, the journal also publishes empirical work in the subject area reflecting cross-fertilizing between theoretical and empirical research. Readers will find original research articles, surveys, and book reviews.Officially cited as: Soc Choice Welf