{"title":"稻草还田对普通荞麦产量和品质的影响","authors":"Peiyun He, Jingang Tang, Rongyu Guo, Kaifeng Huang, Xiaoyan Huang","doi":"10.1007/s42729-024-01909-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To clarify the effects of rice straw returning on the yield and quality of common buckwheat.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Common buckwheat cultivar Fengtian 1 was used across two years and treated with no rice straw returning combined with no compound fertilizer (CK), no rice straw returning combined with normal fertilizer (NSNF), full rice straw returning with 20% (FSRF20%), 40%, (FSRF40%) and 80% (FSRF80%) reduction in compound fertilizer application, and full rice straw returning with no compound fertilizer (FSNF).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Compared with the CK treatment, the FSRF20% treatment increased the accumulation and transport rate of non-structural carbohydrate in leaves at full bloom and grain filling stages and the enzyme activity of rhizosphere soil. With decreased compound fertilizer application rate, the grain weight per plant, 100-grain weight, and yield initially increased and then decreased, reaching the maximum at FSRF20% treatment. Compared with that of the CK treatment, the NSNF, FSRF20%, FSRF40%, FSRF80%, and FSNF treatment increased the yield by 172.54%, 181.02%, 104.49%, 69.30%, and 22.33%, respectively. The proportion of essential amino acids was about half that of total amino acids of common buckwheat. The flavonoid and starch content in grains of FSRF40% treatment were the highest. The protein, total amino acids, and essential amino acids content in grains of CK treatment were the highest.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>For the sustainable development of farmland and improve the economic benefits of cultivating common buckwheat, 20% reduction in compound fertilizer can be considered when the total amount of rice straw was returned to the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":17042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Rice Straw Returning on the Yield and Quality of Common Buckwheat\",\"authors\":\"Peiyun He, Jingang Tang, Rongyu Guo, Kaifeng Huang, Xiaoyan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42729-024-01909-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>To clarify the effects of rice straw returning on the yield and quality of common buckwheat.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Common buckwheat cultivar Fengtian 1 was used across two years and treated with no rice straw returning combined with no compound fertilizer (CK), no rice straw returning combined with normal fertilizer (NSNF), full rice straw returning with 20% (FSRF20%), 40%, (FSRF40%) and 80% (FSRF80%) reduction in compound fertilizer application, and full rice straw returning with no compound fertilizer (FSNF).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Compared with the CK treatment, the FSRF20% treatment increased the accumulation and transport rate of non-structural carbohydrate in leaves at full bloom and grain filling stages and the enzyme activity of rhizosphere soil. With decreased compound fertilizer application rate, the grain weight per plant, 100-grain weight, and yield initially increased and then decreased, reaching the maximum at FSRF20% treatment. Compared with that of the CK treatment, the NSNF, FSRF20%, FSRF40%, FSRF80%, and FSNF treatment increased the yield by 172.54%, 181.02%, 104.49%, 69.30%, and 22.33%, respectively. The proportion of essential amino acids was about half that of total amino acids of common buckwheat. The flavonoid and starch content in grains of FSRF40% treatment were the highest. The protein, total amino acids, and essential amino acids content in grains of CK treatment were the highest.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>For the sustainable development of farmland and improve the economic benefits of cultivating common buckwheat, 20% reduction in compound fertilizer can be considered when the total amount of rice straw was returned to the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01909-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01909-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
方法 对普通荞麦品种奉天1号进行两年试验,分别采用不施复合肥不还田处理(CK)、不施复合肥还田处理(NSNF)、减少20%(FSRF20%)、40%(FSRF40%)和80%(FSRF80%)复合肥施用量的全稻秸秆还田处理以及不施复合肥全稻秸秆还田处理(FSNF)。结果与 CK 处理相比,FSRF20% 处理增加了盛花期和籽粒灌浆期叶片中非结构性碳水化合物的积累和运输率,提高了根瘤土壤中酶的活性。随着复合肥施用量的减少,单株粒重、百粒重和产量先增加后减少,在 FSRF20% 处理时达到最大值。与 CK 处理相比,NSNF、FSRF20%、FSRF40%、FSRF80% 和 FSNF 处理分别增产 172.54%、181.02%、104.49%、69.30% 和 22.33%。必需氨基酸的比例约为普通荞麦氨基酸总量的一半。FSRF40%处理的谷粒中黄酮类化合物和淀粉含量最高。结论 为促进农田可持续发展,提高普通荞麦种植的经济效益,可考虑在稻草全量还田时减少 20% 的复合肥。
Effects of Rice Straw Returning on the Yield and Quality of Common Buckwheat
Purpose
To clarify the effects of rice straw returning on the yield and quality of common buckwheat.
Methods
Common buckwheat cultivar Fengtian 1 was used across two years and treated with no rice straw returning combined with no compound fertilizer (CK), no rice straw returning combined with normal fertilizer (NSNF), full rice straw returning with 20% (FSRF20%), 40%, (FSRF40%) and 80% (FSRF80%) reduction in compound fertilizer application, and full rice straw returning with no compound fertilizer (FSNF).
Results
Compared with the CK treatment, the FSRF20% treatment increased the accumulation and transport rate of non-structural carbohydrate in leaves at full bloom and grain filling stages and the enzyme activity of rhizosphere soil. With decreased compound fertilizer application rate, the grain weight per plant, 100-grain weight, and yield initially increased and then decreased, reaching the maximum at FSRF20% treatment. Compared with that of the CK treatment, the NSNF, FSRF20%, FSRF40%, FSRF80%, and FSNF treatment increased the yield by 172.54%, 181.02%, 104.49%, 69.30%, and 22.33%, respectively. The proportion of essential amino acids was about half that of total amino acids of common buckwheat. The flavonoid and starch content in grains of FSRF40% treatment were the highest. The protein, total amino acids, and essential amino acids content in grains of CK treatment were the highest.
Conclusions
For the sustainable development of farmland and improve the economic benefits of cultivating common buckwheat, 20% reduction in compound fertilizer can be considered when the total amount of rice straw was returned to the field.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition is an international, peer reviewed journal devoted to publishing original research findings in the areas of soil science, plant nutrition, agriculture and environmental science.
Soil sciences submissions may cover physics, chemistry, biology, microbiology, mineralogy, ecology, pedology, soil classification and amelioration.
Plant nutrition and agriculture submissions may include plant production, physiology and metabolism of plants, plant ecology, diversity and sustainability of agricultural systems, organic and inorganic fertilization in relation to their impact on yields, quality of plants and ecological systems, and agroecosystems studies.
Submissions covering soil degradation, environmental pollution, nature conservation, and environmental protection are also welcome.
The journal considers for publication original research articles, technical notes, short communication, and reviews (both voluntary and by invitation), and letters to the editor.