{"title":"在既往接受过化疗和 PD-1 抑制剂治疗的转移性鼻咽癌的二线治疗中再次挑战 PD-1 抑制剂的有效性和安全性","authors":"Weixin Bei, Shuhui Dong, Guoying Liu, Lanfeng Lin, Yaofei Jiang, Nian Lu, Wangzhong Li, Hu Liang, Yanqun Xiang, Weixiong Xia","doi":"10.2147/cmar.s460716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who have progressed on prior anti-PD1 therapy.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> We enrolled patients with mNPC who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapy alone after prior progression of anti-PD1 therapy. The primary endpoint was progress-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR).<br/><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 96 patients were eligible between January 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-seven (38.5%) were in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group, while the remaining 59 patients (61.5%) were in the chemotherapy group. The ORR and DCR of PD-1 ICIs group and chemotherapy group were 37.8% vs 23.7% and 86.5% vs.74.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 21.1 months (IQR 16.1– 28.7), the log-rank analysis demonstrated a significantly improved PFS in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group compared to the chemotherapy group (8.4 months [95% CI 4.3– 14.0] vs 5.0 months [95% CI 2.8– 7.2], <em>P =</em> 0.03). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (28.3 vs 24.1 months, <em>P =</em> 0.09). The two groups had similar adverse reactions, but the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group (18.9% vs 3.4%, <em>P =</em> 0.025).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> mNPC patients who progressed from prior anti-PD1 therapy could benefit from the anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy. However, further validation is needed.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Re-Challenging PD-1 Inhibitors in Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Previously Treated with Chemotherapy and PD-1 Inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"Weixin Bei, Shuhui Dong, Guoying Liu, Lanfeng Lin, Yaofei Jiang, Nian Lu, Wangzhong Li, Hu Liang, Yanqun Xiang, Weixiong Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/cmar.s460716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who have progressed on prior anti-PD1 therapy.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> We enrolled patients with mNPC who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapy alone after prior progression of anti-PD1 therapy. The primary endpoint was progress-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR).<br/><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 96 patients were eligible between January 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-seven (38.5%) were in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group, while the remaining 59 patients (61.5%) were in the chemotherapy group. The ORR and DCR of PD-1 ICIs group and chemotherapy group were 37.8% vs 23.7% and 86.5% vs.74.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 21.1 months (IQR 16.1– 28.7), the log-rank analysis demonstrated a significantly improved PFS in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group compared to the chemotherapy group (8.4 months [95% CI 4.3– 14.0] vs 5.0 months [95% CI 2.8– 7.2], <em>P =</em> 0.03). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (28.3 vs 24.1 months, <em>P =</em> 0.09). The two groups had similar adverse reactions, but the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group (18.9% vs 3.4%, <em>P =</em> 0.025).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> mNPC patients who progressed from prior anti-PD1 therapy could benefit from the anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy. However, further validation is needed.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s460716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s460716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究背景我们旨在评估抗PD1再挑战联合化疗对既往抗PD1治疗进展的转移性鼻咽癌(mNPC)患者的疗效和安全性:我们招募了接受化疗联合PD-1免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)或单独化疗的mNPC患者。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、疾病控制率(DCR)和客观反应率(ORR):2015年1月至2020年12月期间,共有96名患者符合条件。PD-1 ICIs再挑战组有37人(38.5%),其余59人(61.5%)为化疗组。PD-1 ICIs组和化疗组的ORR和DCR分别为37.8% vs 23.7%和86.5% vs.74.5%。中位随访期为21.1个月(IQR 16.1- 28.7),对数秩分析显示,与化疗组相比,PD-1 ICIs再挑战组的PFS显著改善(8.4个月 [95% CI 4.3- 14.0] vs 5.0个月 [95% CI 2.8- 7.2],P = 0.03)。不过,两组患者的 OS 无明显差异(28.3 个月 vs 24.1 个月,P = 0.09)。两组患者的不良反应相似,但PD-1 ICIs再挑战组的3级或4级血小板减少发生率明显更高(18.9% vs 3.4%,P = 0.025)。然而,还需要进一步的验证。
Efficacy and Safety of Re-Challenging PD-1 Inhibitors in Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Previously Treated with Chemotherapy and PD-1 Inhibitors
Background: We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) who have progressed on prior anti-PD1 therapy. Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients with mNPC who received chemotherapy combined with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapy alone after prior progression of anti-PD1 therapy. The primary endpoint was progress-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: A total of 96 patients were eligible between January 2015 and December 2020. Thirty-seven (38.5%) were in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group, while the remaining 59 patients (61.5%) were in the chemotherapy group. The ORR and DCR of PD-1 ICIs group and chemotherapy group were 37.8% vs 23.7% and 86.5% vs.74.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 21.1 months (IQR 16.1– 28.7), the log-rank analysis demonstrated a significantly improved PFS in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group compared to the chemotherapy group (8.4 months [95% CI 4.3– 14.0] vs 5.0 months [95% CI 2.8– 7.2], P = 0.03). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between the two groups (28.3 vs 24.1 months, P = 0.09). The two groups had similar adverse reactions, but the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher in the PD-1 ICIs re-challenge group (18.9% vs 3.4%, P = 0.025). Conclusion: mNPC patients who progressed from prior anti-PD1 therapy could benefit from the anti-PD1 rechallenge in combination with chemotherapy. However, further validation is needed.