绿化是否足够?街道绿化水平和类型对幸福感影响的剂量反应曲线

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Pablo Navarrete-Hernandez , Niloufar Kiarostami , Dicheng Yang , Alp Ozcakir
{"title":"绿化是否足够?街道绿化水平和类型对幸福感影响的剂量反应曲线","authors":"Pablo Navarrete-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Niloufar Kiarostami ,&nbsp;Dicheng Yang ,&nbsp;Alp Ozcakir","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although research shows that individuals report higher levels of happiness when viewing green environments, the dose curve describing the impact of greenery on happiness remains undefined. Current literature only presents dose curves representing the associations between stress recovery and tree coverage, and does not explore how this fluctuates for different types of green infrastructure. Using an image-based randomised control trial with 401 participants, this study assesses the impact of levels and types of street greenery on people’s perceptions of happiness. Participants were randomly assigned to rate one of six images representing proportional increments of street greenery coverage (from 0% to 45%) across three greenery configurations – ground level, between buildings, and vertical (on building façades). The results suggest that the highest levels of perceived happiness are obtained from green coverage of between 35% and 45%, at which point the effect levels off. Vertical greenery coverage has a larger impact on perceived happiness than the other two tested configurations, and has a positive linear rather than concave relationship. The study indicates that viewing greater amounts of greenery significantly enhances communities’ perceived happiness, and shows that the relationship is dependent on the type of green infrastructure configuration used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 105130"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001294/pdfft?md5=6dae72b257d6c84403a993589a690325&pid=1-s2.0-S0169204624001294-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green Enough? A dose-response curve of the impact of street greenery levels and types on perceived happiness\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Navarrete-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Niloufar Kiarostami ,&nbsp;Dicheng Yang ,&nbsp;Alp Ozcakir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although research shows that individuals report higher levels of happiness when viewing green environments, the dose curve describing the impact of greenery on happiness remains undefined. Current literature only presents dose curves representing the associations between stress recovery and tree coverage, and does not explore how this fluctuates for different types of green infrastructure. Using an image-based randomised control trial with 401 participants, this study assesses the impact of levels and types of street greenery on people’s perceptions of happiness. Participants were randomly assigned to rate one of six images representing proportional increments of street greenery coverage (from 0% to 45%) across three greenery configurations – ground level, between buildings, and vertical (on building façades). The results suggest that the highest levels of perceived happiness are obtained from green coverage of between 35% and 45%, at which point the effect levels off. Vertical greenery coverage has a larger impact on perceived happiness than the other two tested configurations, and has a positive linear rather than concave relationship. The study indicates that viewing greater amounts of greenery significantly enhances communities’ perceived happiness, and shows that the relationship is dependent on the type of green infrastructure configuration used.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001294/pdfft?md5=6dae72b257d6c84403a993589a690325&pid=1-s2.0-S0169204624001294-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001294\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管研究表明,人们在观赏绿色环境时会感到更高的幸福感,但描述绿化对幸福感影响的剂量曲线仍未确定。目前的文献只提供了代表压力恢复与树木覆盖率之间关系的剂量曲线,并没有探讨不同类型的绿色基础设施如何波动。本研究通过一项有 401 人参加的基于图像的随机对照试验,评估了街道绿化的水平和类型对人们幸福感的影响。参与者被随机分配到六张图片中,对其中一张图片进行评分,这六张图片分别代表街道绿化覆盖率(从 0% 到 45%)按比例递增的三种绿化配置--地面、建筑物之间和垂直(建筑物外墙)。结果表明,绿化覆盖率在 35% 至 45% 之间时,感知幸福感水平最高,此时效果趋于平稳。与其他两种测试配置相比,垂直绿化覆盖率对幸福感的影响更大,且呈正线性关系而非凹陷关系。研究表明,观赏更多的绿化可显著提高社区的幸福感,并表明这种关系取决于所使用的绿色基础设施配置类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green Enough? A dose-response curve of the impact of street greenery levels and types on perceived happiness

Although research shows that individuals report higher levels of happiness when viewing green environments, the dose curve describing the impact of greenery on happiness remains undefined. Current literature only presents dose curves representing the associations between stress recovery and tree coverage, and does not explore how this fluctuates for different types of green infrastructure. Using an image-based randomised control trial with 401 participants, this study assesses the impact of levels and types of street greenery on people’s perceptions of happiness. Participants were randomly assigned to rate one of six images representing proportional increments of street greenery coverage (from 0% to 45%) across three greenery configurations – ground level, between buildings, and vertical (on building façades). The results suggest that the highest levels of perceived happiness are obtained from green coverage of between 35% and 45%, at which point the effect levels off. Vertical greenery coverage has a larger impact on perceived happiness than the other two tested configurations, and has a positive linear rather than concave relationship. The study indicates that viewing greater amounts of greenery significantly enhances communities’ perceived happiness, and shows that the relationship is dependent on the type of green infrastructure configuration used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信