利用全血裂解进行四色流式细胞术交叉配血

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"利用全血裂解进行四色流式细胞术交叉配血","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In lymphocyte crossmatch using flow cytometry (flow cytometric crossmatch, FCXM), the conventional tricolor FCXM protocol requires a mononuclear cell isolation step. To develop a new, more streamlined protocol, we introduced whole blood lysis (WBL) and CD45 fluorescence-triggered acquisition using 4-color flow cytometry.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A total of 186 donor/recipient pairs for transplantation were classified into donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloantibody-positive (DSA+, n = 78) and DSA-negative (DSA−, n = 108) groups. The latter group was reclassified into blood group ABO-incompatible (ABOi, n = 56) and ABO-compatible (n = 52) subgroups. The WBL FCXM protocol with CD45 V500-C was optimized using a FACSLyric cytometer (BD Biosciences) with 3 lasers. Measurements for </span>T cells or B cells were calculated as a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratio (test divided by control). WBL FCXM was compared with conventional FCXM in each group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>WBL FCXM showed no difference quantitatively compared with conventional FCXM, except for the B cell FCXM in the DSA− group (B cell MFI ratio: 1.06 ± 0.44 and 0.92 ± 0.41, respectively [<em>P</em><span> = .0001]). There was no ABO antibody interference in the ABOi subgroup. Similar results were observed in the qualitative determinations of FCXM as follows: 1) In the DSA+ group, the sensitivity of B cell WBL FCXM (96.2%) showed no difference compared with that of conventional FCXM (91.0%, </span><em>P</em> = .2188) and 2) In the DSA− group, the specificity of T cell WBL FCXM (96.3%) showed no difference compared with that of conventional FCXM (98.1%, <em>P</em><span> = .6250). WBL FCXM reduced the turnaround time by 50 min compared with that by conventional FCXM.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>WBL FCXM demonstrated comparable assay performance to that of conventional FCXM. Because this new FCXM protocol is simple and does not compromise assay sensitivity, it has the potential to replace the conventional method in histocompatibility laboratory settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4-Color Flow Cytometric Crossmatch Using Whole Blood Lysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.02.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In lymphocyte crossmatch using flow cytometry (flow cytometric crossmatch, FCXM), the conventional tricolor FCXM protocol requires a mononuclear cell isolation step. To develop a new, more streamlined protocol, we introduced whole blood lysis (WBL) and CD45 fluorescence-triggered acquisition using 4-color flow cytometry.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A total of 186 donor/recipient pairs for transplantation were classified into donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloantibody-positive (DSA+, n = 78) and DSA-negative (DSA−, n = 108) groups. The latter group was reclassified into blood group ABO-incompatible (ABOi, n = 56) and ABO-compatible (n = 52) subgroups. The WBL FCXM protocol with CD45 V500-C was optimized using a FACSLyric cytometer (BD Biosciences) with 3 lasers. Measurements for </span>T cells or B cells were calculated as a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratio (test divided by control). WBL FCXM was compared with conventional FCXM in each group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>WBL FCXM showed no difference quantitatively compared with conventional FCXM, except for the B cell FCXM in the DSA− group (B cell MFI ratio: 1.06 ± 0.44 and 0.92 ± 0.41, respectively [<em>P</em><span> = .0001]). There was no ABO antibody interference in the ABOi subgroup. Similar results were observed in the qualitative determinations of FCXM as follows: 1) In the DSA+ group, the sensitivity of B cell WBL FCXM (96.2%) showed no difference compared with that of conventional FCXM (91.0%, </span><em>P</em> = .2188) and 2) In the DSA− group, the specificity of T cell WBL FCXM (96.3%) showed no difference compared with that of conventional FCXM (98.1%, <em>P</em><span> = .6250). WBL FCXM reduced the turnaround time by 50 min compared with that by conventional FCXM.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>WBL FCXM demonstrated comparable assay performance to that of conventional FCXM. Because this new FCXM protocol is simple and does not compromise assay sensitivity, it has the potential to replace the conventional method in histocompatibility laboratory settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524003324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524003324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在使用流式细胞仪进行淋巴细胞交叉配对(流式细胞交叉配对,FCXM)时,传统的三色FCXM方案需要一个单核细胞分离步骤。为了开发一种更简化的新方案,我们引入了全血裂解(WBL)和使用四色流式细胞仪的 CD45 荧光触发采集:方法:我们将 186 对移植供体/受体分为供体特异性人类白细胞抗原(HLA)同种抗体阳性组(DSA+,78 人)和 DSA 阴性组(DSA-,108 人)。后者被重新分为血型ABO不相容(ABOi,n = 56)和ABO相容(n = 52)两组。使用带有 3 个激光器的 FACSLyric 细胞计数器(BD Biosciences)对带有 CD45 V500-C 的 WBL FCXM 方案进行了优化。T 细胞或 B 细胞的测量值按平均荧光强度 (MFI) 比值(试验除以对照)计算。将各组的 WBL FCXM 与传统 FCXM 进行比较:结果:WBL FCXM 与传统 FCXM 相比,除 DSA 组的 B 细胞 FCXM 外(B 细胞 MFI 比值分别为 1.06 ± 0.44 和 0.92 ± 0.41 [P=0.0001]),在数量上没有差异。ABOi 亚组中没有 ABO 抗体干扰。在 FCXM 的定性测定中也观察到了类似的结果,具体如下:1)在 DSA+ 组,B 细胞 WBL FCXM 的灵敏度(96.2%)与常规 FCXM 的灵敏度(91.0%,P = .2188)相比没有差异;2)在 DSA- 组,T 细胞 WBL FCXM 的特异性(96.3%)与常规 FCXM 的特异性(98.1%,P = .6250)相比没有差异。与传统 FCXM 相比,WBL FCXM 的周转时间缩短了 50 分钟:结论:WBL FCXM 的检测性能与传统 FCXM 相当。由于这种新的 FCXM 方案简单且不影响检测灵敏度,因此有可能在组织相容性实验室中取代传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
4-Color Flow Cytometric Crossmatch Using Whole Blood Lysis

Background

In lymphocyte crossmatch using flow cytometry (flow cytometric crossmatch, FCXM), the conventional tricolor FCXM protocol requires a mononuclear cell isolation step. To develop a new, more streamlined protocol, we introduced whole blood lysis (WBL) and CD45 fluorescence-triggered acquisition using 4-color flow cytometry.

Methods

A total of 186 donor/recipient pairs for transplantation were classified into donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloantibody-positive (DSA+, n = 78) and DSA-negative (DSA−, n = 108) groups. The latter group was reclassified into blood group ABO-incompatible (ABOi, n = 56) and ABO-compatible (n = 52) subgroups. The WBL FCXM protocol with CD45 V500-C was optimized using a FACSLyric cytometer (BD Biosciences) with 3 lasers. Measurements for T cells or B cells were calculated as a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratio (test divided by control). WBL FCXM was compared with conventional FCXM in each group.

Results

WBL FCXM showed no difference quantitatively compared with conventional FCXM, except for the B cell FCXM in the DSA− group (B cell MFI ratio: 1.06 ± 0.44 and 0.92 ± 0.41, respectively [P = .0001]). There was no ABO antibody interference in the ABOi subgroup. Similar results were observed in the qualitative determinations of FCXM as follows: 1) In the DSA+ group, the sensitivity of B cell WBL FCXM (96.2%) showed no difference compared with that of conventional FCXM (91.0%, P = .2188) and 2) In the DSA− group, the specificity of T cell WBL FCXM (96.3%) showed no difference compared with that of conventional FCXM (98.1%, P = .6250). WBL FCXM reduced the turnaround time by 50 min compared with that by conventional FCXM.

Conclusions

WBL FCXM demonstrated comparable assay performance to that of conventional FCXM. Because this new FCXM protocol is simple and does not compromise assay sensitivity, it has the potential to replace the conventional method in histocompatibility laboratory settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信