在乌干达从动物和环境中采集的蜱虫中进行烧伤柯西氏菌的分子检测。

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Wilfred Eneku, Bernard Erima, Anatoli Maranda Byaruhanga, Nora Cleary, Gladys Atim, Titus Tugume, Qouilazoni Aquino Ukuli, Hannah Kibuuka, Edison Mworozi, Robert Tweyongyere, Christina E. Douglas, Jeffrey W. Koehler, Michael E. von Fricken, Fred Wabwire-Mangen, Denis K. Byarugaba
{"title":"在乌干达从动物和环境中采集的蜱虫中进行烧伤柯西氏菌的分子检测。","authors":"Wilfred Eneku,&nbsp;Bernard Erima,&nbsp;Anatoli Maranda Byaruhanga,&nbsp;Nora Cleary,&nbsp;Gladys Atim,&nbsp;Titus Tugume,&nbsp;Qouilazoni Aquino Ukuli,&nbsp;Hannah Kibuuka,&nbsp;Edison Mworozi,&nbsp;Robert Tweyongyere,&nbsp;Christina E. Douglas,&nbsp;Jeffrey W. Koehler,&nbsp;Michael E. von Fricken,&nbsp;Fred Wabwire-Mangen,&nbsp;Denis K. Byarugaba","doi":"10.1111/zph.13168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p><i>Coxiella burnetii</i> is a highly infectious organism that is easily spread through aerosols causing Q fever in humans. Ticks can harbour and transmit <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> to animals, contributing to disease maintenance. Our aim was to examine the presence of <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> in ticks in Uganda.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, ticks were collected from five Ugandan districts and tested by real-time PCR for <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> (<i>Coxiella</i> outer membrane protein 1 gene). A total of 859 tick pools (9602 individual ticks) were tested, and pool positivity for <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> was 5.5% (<i>n</i> = 47). Pooled prevalence differed by district; the highest was Luwero (7.3%), then Gulu (6.6%), and Kasese had the lowest (1.3%). However, district variation was not statistically significant (Fisher's exact = 0.07). Ticks collected from dogs and cats had the highest positivity rates [23/47, (48.9%)] followed by livestock (cattle, goats, sheep, and pigs) [18/47, (38.3%)] and vegetation [6/47, (12.8%)]. <i>Haemaphysalis elliptica</i> had the highest infection rates, followed by <i>Rhipicephalus appendiculatus</i>, <i>Amblyomma variegatum</i> and <i>Rhipicephalus decoloratus</i> had similar prevalence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although ticks are not the primary transmitters of <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> to humans, pathogen detection in ticks can be an indirect indicator of risk among animal hosts. Vulnerable populations, including occupations with close animal contact such as farming, butchery, and veterinary practice, have an increased risk of <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> exposure. Veterinarians and clinicians should be aware that <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> may cause human and animal illness in these regions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":24025,"journal":{"name":"Zoonoses and Public Health","volume":"71 8","pages":"869-875"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/zph.13168","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in ticks collected from animals and the environment in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"Wilfred Eneku,&nbsp;Bernard Erima,&nbsp;Anatoli Maranda Byaruhanga,&nbsp;Nora Cleary,&nbsp;Gladys Atim,&nbsp;Titus Tugume,&nbsp;Qouilazoni Aquino Ukuli,&nbsp;Hannah Kibuuka,&nbsp;Edison Mworozi,&nbsp;Robert Tweyongyere,&nbsp;Christina E. Douglas,&nbsp;Jeffrey W. Koehler,&nbsp;Michael E. von Fricken,&nbsp;Fred Wabwire-Mangen,&nbsp;Denis K. Byarugaba\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/zph.13168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p><i>Coxiella burnetii</i> is a highly infectious organism that is easily spread through aerosols causing Q fever in humans. Ticks can harbour and transmit <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> to animals, contributing to disease maintenance. Our aim was to examine the presence of <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> in ticks in Uganda.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, ticks were collected from five Ugandan districts and tested by real-time PCR for <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> (<i>Coxiella</i> outer membrane protein 1 gene). A total of 859 tick pools (9602 individual ticks) were tested, and pool positivity for <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> was 5.5% (<i>n</i> = 47). Pooled prevalence differed by district; the highest was Luwero (7.3%), then Gulu (6.6%), and Kasese had the lowest (1.3%). However, district variation was not statistically significant (Fisher's exact = 0.07). Ticks collected from dogs and cats had the highest positivity rates [23/47, (48.9%)] followed by livestock (cattle, goats, sheep, and pigs) [18/47, (38.3%)] and vegetation [6/47, (12.8%)]. <i>Haemaphysalis elliptica</i> had the highest infection rates, followed by <i>Rhipicephalus appendiculatus</i>, <i>Amblyomma variegatum</i> and <i>Rhipicephalus decoloratus</i> had similar prevalence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although ticks are not the primary transmitters of <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> to humans, pathogen detection in ticks can be an indirect indicator of risk among animal hosts. Vulnerable populations, including occupations with close animal contact such as farming, butchery, and veterinary practice, have an increased risk of <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> exposure. Veterinarians and clinicians should be aware that <i>C</i>. <i>burnetii</i> may cause human and animal illness in these regions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoonoses and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"71 8\",\"pages\":\"869-875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/zph.13168\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoonoses and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zph.13168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoonoses and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zph.13168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:烧伤柯西氏菌是一种传染性极强的病菌,很容易通过气溶胶传播,导致人类感染 Q 热。蜱虫可携带烧伤蜱并将其传播给动物,从而导致疾病的持续。我们的目的是研究乌干达蜱虫中是否存在烧伤蜱:在这项研究中,我们从乌干达的五个地区收集了蜱虫,并通过实时 PCR 检测了烧伤蜱(柯克西氏外膜蛋白质 1 基因)。共检测了 859 个蜱池(9602 个蜱个体),池中烧伤蜱阳性率为 5.5%(n = 47)。不同地区的集合感染率不同;最高的是卢韦罗(7.3%),然后是古卢(6.6%),卡塞塞最低(1.3%)。不过,地区差异在统计学上并不显著(费雪精确值 = 0.07)。从狗和猫身上采集的蜱虫阳性率最高[23/47,(48.9%)],其次是牲畜(牛、山羊、绵羊和猪)[18/47,(38.3%)]和植物[6/47,(12.8%)]。Haemaphysalis elliptica的感染率最高,其次是Rhipicephalus appendiculatus,Amblyomma variegatum和Rhipicephalus decoloratus的感染率相似:结论:虽然蜱虫不是烧伤蜱的主要传播者,但在蜱虫中检测到病原体可以间接反映动物宿主的风险。易感人群,包括养殖、屠宰和兽医等与动物密切接触的职业,接触烧伤蜱的风险会增加。兽医和临床医生应该意识到,在这些地区,烧伤蜱可能会导致人类和动物患病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in ticks collected from animals and the environment in Uganda

Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in ticks collected from animals and the environment in Uganda

Aims

Coxiella burnetii is a highly infectious organism that is easily spread through aerosols causing Q fever in humans. Ticks can harbour and transmit C. burnetii to animals, contributing to disease maintenance. Our aim was to examine the presence of C. burnetii in ticks in Uganda.

Methods and Results

In this study, ticks were collected from five Ugandan districts and tested by real-time PCR for C. burnetii (Coxiella outer membrane protein 1 gene). A total of 859 tick pools (9602 individual ticks) were tested, and pool positivity for C. burnetii was 5.5% (n = 47). Pooled prevalence differed by district; the highest was Luwero (7.3%), then Gulu (6.6%), and Kasese had the lowest (1.3%). However, district variation was not statistically significant (Fisher's exact = 0.07). Ticks collected from dogs and cats had the highest positivity rates [23/47, (48.9%)] followed by livestock (cattle, goats, sheep, and pigs) [18/47, (38.3%)] and vegetation [6/47, (12.8%)]. Haemaphysalis elliptica had the highest infection rates, followed by Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, Amblyomma variegatum and Rhipicephalus decoloratus had similar prevalence.

Conclusions

Although ticks are not the primary transmitters of C. burnetii to humans, pathogen detection in ticks can be an indirect indicator of risk among animal hosts. Vulnerable populations, including occupations with close animal contact such as farming, butchery, and veterinary practice, have an increased risk of C. burnetii exposure. Veterinarians and clinicians should be aware that C. burnetii may cause human and animal illness in these regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoonoses and Public Health
Zoonoses and Public Health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoonoses and Public Health brings together veterinary and human health researchers and policy-makers by providing a venue for publishing integrated and global approaches to zoonoses and public health. The Editors will consider papers that focus on timely collaborative and multi-disciplinary research in zoonoses and public health. This journal provides rapid publication of original papers, reviews, and potential discussion papers embracing this collaborative spirit. Papers should advance the scientific knowledge of the sources, transmission, prevention and control of zoonoses and be authored by scientists with expertise in areas such as microbiology, virology, parasitology and epidemiology. Articles that incorporate recent data into new methods, applications, or approaches (e.g. statistical modeling) which enhance public health are strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信