Aidan Boyd, Zezhong Ye, Sanjay P Prabhu, Michael C Tjong, Yining Zha, Anna Zapaishchykova, Sridhar Vajapeyam, Paul J Catalano, Hasaan Hayat, Rishi Chopra, Kevin X Liu, Ali Nabavizadeh, Adam C Resnick, Sabine Mueller, Daphne A Haas-Kogan, Hugo J W L Aerts, Tina Y Poussaint, Benjamin H Kann
下载PDF
{"title":"在数据有限的情况下,针对专家级小儿脑肿瘤磁共振成像分割的逐步迁移学习。","authors":"Aidan Boyd, Zezhong Ye, Sanjay P Prabhu, Michael C Tjong, Yining Zha, Anna Zapaishchykova, Sridhar Vajapeyam, Paul J Catalano, Hasaan Hayat, Rishi Chopra, Kevin X Liu, Ali Nabavizadeh, Adam C Resnick, Sabine Mueller, Daphne A Haas-Kogan, Hugo J W L Aerts, Tina Y Poussaint, Benjamin H Kann","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop, externally test, and evaluate clinical acceptability of a deep learning pediatric brain tumor segmentation model using stepwise transfer learning. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, the authors leveraged two T2-weighted MRI datasets (May 2001 through December 2015) from a national brain tumor consortium (<i>n</i> = 184; median age, 7 years [range, 1-23 years]; 94 male patients) and a pediatric cancer center (<i>n</i> = 100; median age, 8 years [range, 1-19 years]; 47 male patients) to develop and evaluate deep learning neural networks for pediatric low-grade glioma segmentation using a stepwise transfer learning approach to maximize performance in a limited data scenario. The best model was externally tested on an independent test set and subjected to randomized blinded evaluation by three clinicians, wherein they assessed clinical acceptability of expert- and artificial intelligence (AI)-generated segmentations via 10-point Likert scales and Turing tests. Results The best AI model used in-domain stepwise transfer learning (median Dice score coefficient, 0.88 [IQR, 0.72-0.91] vs 0.812 [IQR, 0.56-0.89] for baseline model; <i>P</i> = .049). With external testing, the AI model yielded excellent accuracy using reference standards from three clinical experts (median Dice similarity coefficients: expert 1, 0.83 [IQR, 0.75-0.90]; expert 2, 0.81 [IQR, 0.70-0.89]; expert 3, 0.81 [IQR, 0.68-0.88]; mean accuracy, 0.82). For clinical benchmarking (<i>n</i> = 100 scans), experts rated AI-based segmentations higher on average compared with other experts (median Likert score, 9 [IQR, 7-9] vs 7 [IQR 7-9]) and rated more AI segmentations as clinically acceptable (80.2% vs 65.4%). Experts correctly predicted the origin of AI segmentations in an average of 26.0% of cases. Conclusion Stepwise transfer learning enabled expert-level automated pediatric brain tumor autosegmentation and volumetric measurement with a high level of clinical acceptability. <b>Keywords:</b> Stepwise Transfer Learning, Pediatric Brain Tumors, MRI Segmentation, Deep Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article</i>. © RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stepwise Transfer Learning for Expert-level Pediatric Brain Tumor MRI Segmentation in a Limited Data Scenario.\",\"authors\":\"Aidan Boyd, Zezhong Ye, Sanjay P Prabhu, Michael C Tjong, Yining Zha, Anna Zapaishchykova, Sridhar Vajapeyam, Paul J Catalano, Hasaan Hayat, Rishi Chopra, Kevin X Liu, Ali Nabavizadeh, Adam C Resnick, Sabine Mueller, Daphne A Haas-Kogan, Hugo J W L Aerts, Tina Y Poussaint, Benjamin H Kann\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryai.230254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To develop, externally test, and evaluate clinical acceptability of a deep learning pediatric brain tumor segmentation model using stepwise transfer learning. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, the authors leveraged two T2-weighted MRI datasets (May 2001 through December 2015) from a national brain tumor consortium (<i>n</i> = 184; median age, 7 years [range, 1-23 years]; 94 male patients) and a pediatric cancer center (<i>n</i> = 100; median age, 8 years [range, 1-19 years]; 47 male patients) to develop and evaluate deep learning neural networks for pediatric low-grade glioma segmentation using a stepwise transfer learning approach to maximize performance in a limited data scenario. The best model was externally tested on an independent test set and subjected to randomized blinded evaluation by three clinicians, wherein they assessed clinical acceptability of expert- and artificial intelligence (AI)-generated segmentations via 10-point Likert scales and Turing tests. Results The best AI model used in-domain stepwise transfer learning (median Dice score coefficient, 0.88 [IQR, 0.72-0.91] vs 0.812 [IQR, 0.56-0.89] for baseline model; <i>P</i> = .049). With external testing, the AI model yielded excellent accuracy using reference standards from three clinical experts (median Dice similarity coefficients: expert 1, 0.83 [IQR, 0.75-0.90]; expert 2, 0.81 [IQR, 0.70-0.89]; expert 3, 0.81 [IQR, 0.68-0.88]; mean accuracy, 0.82). For clinical benchmarking (<i>n</i> = 100 scans), experts rated AI-based segmentations higher on average compared with other experts (median Likert score, 9 [IQR, 7-9] vs 7 [IQR 7-9]) and rated more AI segmentations as clinically acceptable (80.2% vs 65.4%). Experts correctly predicted the origin of AI segmentations in an average of 26.0% of cases. Conclusion Stepwise transfer learning enabled expert-level automated pediatric brain tumor autosegmentation and volumetric measurement with a high level of clinical acceptability. <b>Keywords:</b> Stepwise Transfer Learning, Pediatric Brain Tumors, MRI Segmentation, Deep Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article</i>. © RSNA, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用