胸椎旁阻滞和舒芬太尼对胸腔镜肺癌手术疗效和术后认知功能障碍的影响。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Dan-Dan Wang, Hong-Yu Wang, Yan Zhu, Xi-Hua Lu
{"title":"胸椎旁阻滞和舒芬太尼对胸腔镜肺癌手术疗效和术后认知功能障碍的影响。","authors":"Dan-Dan Wang, Hong-Yu Wang, Yan Zhu, Xi-Hua Lu","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain management and cognitive function preservation are crucial for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer (LC). This is achieved using either a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) or sufentanil (SUF)-based multimodal analgesia. However, the efficacy and impact of their combined use on postoperative pain and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the analgesic effect and the influence on POCD of TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC to help optimize postoperative pain management and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 107 patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC at The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital between May 2021 and January 2023. Patients receiving SUF-based multimodal analgesia (<i>n</i> = 50) and patients receiving TPVB + SUF-based multimodal analgesia (<i>n</i> = 57) were assigned to the control group and TPVB group, respectively. We compared the Ramsay Sedation Scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and with cough between the two groups at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Serum levels of epinephrine (E), angio-tensin II (Ang II), norepinephrine (NE), superoxide dismutase (SOD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and S-100 calcium-binding protein β (S-100β) were measured before and 24 h after surgery. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered 1 day before surgery and at 3 and 5 days after surgery, and the occurrence of POCD was monitored for 5 days after surgery. Adverse reactions were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant time point, between-group, and interaction effects in Ramsay sedation scores between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Significantly, there were notable time point effects, between-group differences, and interaction effects observed in VAS scores both at rest and with cough (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The VAS scores at rest and with cough at 12 and 24 h after surgery were lower than those at 2 h after surgery and gradually decreased as postoperative time increased (<i>P <</i> 0.05). The TPVB group had lower VAS scores than the control group at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery (<i>P <</i> 0.05). The MMSE scores at postoperative days 1 and 3 were markedly higher in the TPVB group than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the control group within 5 days after surgery (<i>P <</i> 0.05). Both groups had elevated serum E, Ang II, and NE and decreased serum SOD levels at 24 h after surgery compared with the preoperative levels, with better indices in the TPVB group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Marked elevations in serum levels of VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β were observed in both groups at 24 h after surgery, with lower levels in the TPVB group than in the control group (<i>P <</i> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia further relieves pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical surgery for LC, enhances analgesic effects, reduces postoperative stress response, and inhibits postoperative increases in serum VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β levels. This scheme also reduced POCD and had a high safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of thoracic paravertebral block and sufentanil on outcomes and postoperative cognitive dysfunction in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Dan-Dan Wang, Hong-Yu Wang, Yan Zhu, Xi-Hua Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain management and cognitive function preservation are crucial for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer (LC). This is achieved using either a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) or sufentanil (SUF)-based multimodal analgesia. However, the efficacy and impact of their combined use on postoperative pain and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the analgesic effect and the influence on POCD of TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC to help optimize postoperative pain management and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 107 patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC at The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital between May 2021 and January 2023. Patients receiving SUF-based multimodal analgesia (<i>n</i> = 50) and patients receiving TPVB + SUF-based multimodal analgesia (<i>n</i> = 57) were assigned to the control group and TPVB group, respectively. We compared the Ramsay Sedation Scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and with cough between the two groups at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Serum levels of epinephrine (E), angio-tensin II (Ang II), norepinephrine (NE), superoxide dismutase (SOD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and S-100 calcium-binding protein β (S-100β) were measured before and 24 h after surgery. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered 1 day before surgery and at 3 and 5 days after surgery, and the occurrence of POCD was monitored for 5 days after surgery. Adverse reactions were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant time point, between-group, and interaction effects in Ramsay sedation scores between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Significantly, there were notable time point effects, between-group differences, and interaction effects observed in VAS scores both at rest and with cough (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The VAS scores at rest and with cough at 12 and 24 h after surgery were lower than those at 2 h after surgery and gradually decreased as postoperative time increased (<i>P <</i> 0.05). The TPVB group had lower VAS scores than the control group at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery (<i>P <</i> 0.05). The MMSE scores at postoperative days 1 and 3 were markedly higher in the TPVB group than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the control group within 5 days after surgery (<i>P <</i> 0.05). Both groups had elevated serum E, Ang II, and NE and decreased serum SOD levels at 24 h after surgery compared with the preoperative levels, with better indices in the TPVB group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Marked elevations in serum levels of VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β were observed in both groups at 24 h after surgery, with lower levels in the TPVB group than in the control group (<i>P <</i> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia further relieves pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical surgery for LC, enhances analgesic effects, reduces postoperative stress response, and inhibits postoperative increases in serum VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β levels. This scheme also reduced POCD and had a high safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.894\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后疼痛控制和认知功能保护对于接受胸腔镜肺癌(LC)手术的患者至关重要。这需要使用胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)或舒芬太尼(SUF)为基础的多模式镇痛。目的:探讨TPVB联合基于舒芬太尼的多模式镇痛对胸腔镜下LC根治性切除术患者的镇痛效果及对POCD的影响,以帮助优化术后疼痛管理并改善患者预后:该回顾性分析纳入了2021年5月至2023年1月期间在郑州大学附属肿瘤医院和河南省肿瘤医院接受胸腔镜下LC根治性切除术的107例患者。接受 SUF 多模式镇痛的患者(n = 50)和接受 TPVB + SUF 多模式镇痛的患者(n = 57)分别被分配到对照组和 TPVB 组。我们比较了两组患者在术后 2、12 和 24 小时休息时和咳嗽时的拉姆塞镇静量表和视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评分。在手术前和手术后 24 小时,我们测量了血清中肾上腺素 (E)、血管紧张素 II (AngⅡ)、去甲肾上腺素 (NE)、超氧化物歧化酶 (SOD)、血管内皮生长因子 (VEGF)、转化生长因子-β1 (TGF-β1)、肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α) 和 S-100 钙结合蛋白 β (S-100β)的水平。术前 1 天、术后 3 天和 5 天进行了迷你精神状态检查(MMSE),术后 5 天监测了 POCD 的发生情况。此外,还记录了不良反应:两组患者的拉姆塞镇静评分在时间点、组间和交互作用方面均无明显差异(P > 0.05)。值得注意的是,静息时和咳嗽时的 VAS 评分有明显的时间点效应、组间差异和交互效应(P < 0.05)。术后 12 小时和 24 小时休息时和咳嗽时的 VAS 评分均低于术后 2 小时的评分,且随着术后时间的延长而逐渐降低(P 0.05)。TPVB组术后2、12和24小时的VAS评分均低于对照组(P 0.05)。术后第 1 天和第 3 天,TPVB 组的 MMSE 评分明显高于对照组(P < 0.05)。术后 5 天内,TPVB 组的 POCD 发生率明显低于对照组(P 0.05)。与术前水平相比,两组患者术后 24 小时的血清 E、Ang II 和 NE 水平均升高,血清 SOD 水平降低,其中 TPVB 组的指标更好(P < 0.05)。两组术后 24 h 血清中 VEGF、TGF-β1、TNF-α 和 S-100β 水平均明显升高,TPVB 组低于对照组(P 0.05):结论:TPVB联合基于SUF的多模式镇痛可进一步缓解胸腔镜LC根治术患者的疼痛,增强镇痛效果,降低术后应激反应,抑制术后血清VEGF、TGF-β1、TNF-α和S-100β水平的升高。该方案还减少了 POCD,安全性较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of thoracic paravertebral block and sufentanil on outcomes and postoperative cognitive dysfunction in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.

Background: Postoperative pain management and cognitive function preservation are crucial for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer (LC). This is achieved using either a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) or sufentanil (SUF)-based multimodal analgesia. However, the efficacy and impact of their combined use on postoperative pain and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remain unclear.

Aim: To explore the analgesic effect and the influence on POCD of TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC to help optimize postoperative pain management and improve patient outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 107 patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC at The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital between May 2021 and January 2023. Patients receiving SUF-based multimodal analgesia (n = 50) and patients receiving TPVB + SUF-based multimodal analgesia (n = 57) were assigned to the control group and TPVB group, respectively. We compared the Ramsay Sedation Scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and with cough between the two groups at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Serum levels of epinephrine (E), angio-tensin II (Ang II), norepinephrine (NE), superoxide dismutase (SOD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and S-100 calcium-binding protein β (S-100β) were measured before and 24 h after surgery. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered 1 day before surgery and at 3 and 5 days after surgery, and the occurrence of POCD was monitored for 5 days after surgery. Adverse reactions were also recorded.

Results: There were no significant time point, between-group, and interaction effects in Ramsay sedation scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Significantly, there were notable time point effects, between-group differences, and interaction effects observed in VAS scores both at rest and with cough (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at rest and with cough at 12 and 24 h after surgery were lower than those at 2 h after surgery and gradually decreased as postoperative time increased (P < 0.05). The TPVB group had lower VAS scores than the control group at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The MMSE scores at postoperative days 1 and 3 were markedly higher in the TPVB group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the control group within 5 days after surgery (P < 0.05). Both groups had elevated serum E, Ang II, and NE and decreased serum SOD levels at 24 h after surgery compared with the preoperative levels, with better indices in the TPVB group (P < 0.05). Marked elevations in serum levels of VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β were observed in both groups at 24 h after surgery, with lower levels in the TPVB group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia further relieves pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical surgery for LC, enhances analgesic effects, reduces postoperative stress response, and inhibits postoperative increases in serum VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β levels. This scheme also reduced POCD and had a high safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信