系统干预与心理干预相结合对口咽功能障碍的中风患者的影响。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Jie Song, Jian-Dong Wang, Di Chen, Jing Chen, Jin-Feng Huang, Mao Fang
{"title":"系统干预与心理干预相结合对口咽功能障碍的中风患者的影响。","authors":"Jie Song, Jian-Dong Wang, Di Chen, Jing Chen, Jin-Feng Huang, Mao Fang","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke frequently results in oropharyngeal dysfunction (OD), leading to difficulties in swallowing and eating, as well as triggering negative emotions, malnutrition, and aspiration pneumonia, which can be detrimental to patients. However, routine nursing interventions often fail to address these issues adequately. Systemic and psychological interventions can improve dysphagia symptoms, relieve negative emotions, and improve quality of life. However, there are few clinical reports of systemic interventions combined with psychological interventions for stroke patients with OD.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the effects of combining systemic and psychological interventions in stroke patients with OD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 90 stroke patients with OD, admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College (January 2022-December 2023), who were divided into two groups: regular and coalition. Swallowing function grading (using a water swallow test), swallowing function [using the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA)], negative emotions [using the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS)], and quality of life (SWAL-QOL) were compared between groups before and after the intervention; aspiration pneumonia incidence was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention, the coalition group had a greater number of patients with grade 1 swallowing function compared to the regular group, while the number of patients with grade 5 swallowing function was lower than that in the regular group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Post-intervention, the SSA, SAS, and SDS scores of both groups decreased, with a more significant decrease observed in the coalition group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the total SWAL-QOL score in both groups increased, with a more significant increase observed in the coalition group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). During the intervention period, the total incidence of aspiration and aspiration pneumonia in the coalition group was lower than that in the control group (4.44% <i>vs</i> 20.00%; <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Systemic intervention combined with psychological intervention can improve dysphagia symptoms, alleviate negative emotions, enhance quality of life, and reduce the incidence of aspiration pneumonia in patients with OD.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a systemic intervention combined with a psychological intervention in stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysfunction.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Song, Jian-Dong Wang, Di Chen, Jing Chen, Jin-Feng Huang, Mao Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke frequently results in oropharyngeal dysfunction (OD), leading to difficulties in swallowing and eating, as well as triggering negative emotions, malnutrition, and aspiration pneumonia, which can be detrimental to patients. However, routine nursing interventions often fail to address these issues adequately. Systemic and psychological interventions can improve dysphagia symptoms, relieve negative emotions, and improve quality of life. However, there are few clinical reports of systemic interventions combined with psychological interventions for stroke patients with OD.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the effects of combining systemic and psychological interventions in stroke patients with OD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 90 stroke patients with OD, admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College (January 2022-December 2023), who were divided into two groups: regular and coalition. Swallowing function grading (using a water swallow test), swallowing function [using the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA)], negative emotions [using the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS)], and quality of life (SWAL-QOL) were compared between groups before and after the intervention; aspiration pneumonia incidence was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-intervention, the coalition group had a greater number of patients with grade 1 swallowing function compared to the regular group, while the number of patients with grade 5 swallowing function was lower than that in the regular group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Post-intervention, the SSA, SAS, and SDS scores of both groups decreased, with a more significant decrease observed in the coalition group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the total SWAL-QOL score in both groups increased, with a more significant increase observed in the coalition group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). During the intervention period, the total incidence of aspiration and aspiration pneumonia in the coalition group was lower than that in the control group (4.44% <i>vs</i> 20.00%; <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Systemic intervention combined with psychological intervention can improve dysphagia symptoms, alleviate negative emotions, enhance quality of life, and reduce the incidence of aspiration pneumonia in patients with OD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230081/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.904\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑卒中经常导致口咽功能障碍(OD),导致吞咽和进食困难,并引发负面情绪、营养不良和吸入性肺炎,对患者造成损害。然而,常规护理干预往往无法充分解决这些问题。系统和心理干预可以改善吞咽困难症状,缓解负面情绪,提高生活质量。目的:探讨系统干预与心理干预相结合对中风患者吞咽困难的影响:本回顾性研究纳入齐齐哈尔医学院第二附属医院(2022年1月-2023年12月)收治的90例脑卒中OD患者,分为常规组和联合组。比较干预前后两组患者的吞咽功能分级(采用吞水试验)、吞咽功能(采用标准化吞咽评估(SSA))、负性情绪(采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS))和生活质量(SWAL-QOL),并记录吸入性肺炎的发生率:干预后,与普通组相比,联盟组吞咽功能 1 级的患者人数更多,而吞咽功能 5 级的患者人数低于普通组(P < 0.05)。干预后,两组患者的 SSA、SAS 和 SDS 评分均有所下降,联盟组的下降幅度更大(P < 0.05)。此外,两组的 SWAL-QOL 总分均有所上升,联盟组的上升幅度更大(P < 0.05)。在干预期间,联盟组吸入和吸入性肺炎的总发生率低于对照组(4.44% vs 20.00%; P < 0.05):结论:系统干预联合心理干预可改善吞咽困难症状,缓解负面情绪,提高生活质量,降低OD患者吸入性肺炎的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of a systemic intervention combined with a psychological intervention in stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysfunction.

Background: Stroke frequently results in oropharyngeal dysfunction (OD), leading to difficulties in swallowing and eating, as well as triggering negative emotions, malnutrition, and aspiration pneumonia, which can be detrimental to patients. However, routine nursing interventions often fail to address these issues adequately. Systemic and psychological interventions can improve dysphagia symptoms, relieve negative emotions, and improve quality of life. However, there are few clinical reports of systemic interventions combined with psychological interventions for stroke patients with OD.

Aim: To explore the effects of combining systemic and psychological interventions in stroke patients with OD.

Methods: This retrospective study included 90 stroke patients with OD, admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College (January 2022-December 2023), who were divided into two groups: regular and coalition. Swallowing function grading (using a water swallow test), swallowing function [using the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA)], negative emotions [using the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS)], and quality of life (SWAL-QOL) were compared between groups before and after the intervention; aspiration pneumonia incidence was recorded.

Results: Post-intervention, the coalition group had a greater number of patients with grade 1 swallowing function compared to the regular group, while the number of patients with grade 5 swallowing function was lower than that in the regular group (P < 0.05). Post-intervention, the SSA, SAS, and SDS scores of both groups decreased, with a more significant decrease observed in the coalition group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the total SWAL-QOL score in both groups increased, with a more significant increase observed in the coalition group (P < 0.05). During the intervention period, the total incidence of aspiration and aspiration pneumonia in the coalition group was lower than that in the control group (4.44% vs 20.00%; P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Systemic intervention combined with psychological intervention can improve dysphagia symptoms, alleviate negative emotions, enhance quality of life, and reduce the incidence of aspiration pneumonia in patients with OD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信