岛屿和大陆蚂蚁种群遗传多样性和种群遗传结构的集合级比较。

IF 3.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Evolution Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/evolut/qpae103
Ida Naughton, Neil D Tsutsui, Philip S Ward, David A Holway
{"title":"岛屿和大陆蚂蚁种群遗传多样性和种群遗传结构的集合级比较。","authors":"Ida Naughton, Neil D Tsutsui, Philip S Ward, David A Holway","doi":"10.1093/evolut/qpae103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Island biotas provide unparalleled opportunities to examine evolutionary processes. Founder effects and bottlenecks, e.g., typically decrease genetic diversity in island populations, while selection for reduced dispersal can increase population structure. Given that support for these generalities mostly comes from single-species analyses, assemblage-level comparisons are needed to clarify how (i) colonization affects the gene pools of interacting insular organisms, and (ii) patterns of genetic differentiation vary within assemblages of organisms. Here, we use genome-wide sequence data from ultraconserved elements (UCEs) to compare the genetic diversity and population structure of mainland and island populations of nine ant species in coastal southern California. As expected, island populations (from Santa Cruz Island) had lower expected heterozygosity and Watterson's theta compared to mainland populations (from the Lompoc Valley). Island populations, however, exhibited smaller genetic distances among samples, indicating less population subdivision. Within the focal assemblage, pairwise Fst values revealed pronounced interspecific variation in mainland-island differentiation, which increases with gyne body size. Our results reveal population differences across an assemblage of interacting species and illuminate general patterns of insularization in ants. Compared to single-species studies, our analysis of nine conspecific population pairs from the same island-mainland system offers a powerful approach to studying fundamental evolutionary processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12082,"journal":{"name":"Evolution","volume":" ","pages":"1685-1698"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assemblage-level comparison of genetic diversity and population genetic structure between island and mainland ant populations.\",\"authors\":\"Ida Naughton, Neil D Tsutsui, Philip S Ward, David A Holway\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/evolut/qpae103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Island biotas provide unparalleled opportunities to examine evolutionary processes. Founder effects and bottlenecks, e.g., typically decrease genetic diversity in island populations, while selection for reduced dispersal can increase population structure. Given that support for these generalities mostly comes from single-species analyses, assemblage-level comparisons are needed to clarify how (i) colonization affects the gene pools of interacting insular organisms, and (ii) patterns of genetic differentiation vary within assemblages of organisms. Here, we use genome-wide sequence data from ultraconserved elements (UCEs) to compare the genetic diversity and population structure of mainland and island populations of nine ant species in coastal southern California. As expected, island populations (from Santa Cruz Island) had lower expected heterozygosity and Watterson's theta compared to mainland populations (from the Lompoc Valley). Island populations, however, exhibited smaller genetic distances among samples, indicating less population subdivision. Within the focal assemblage, pairwise Fst values revealed pronounced interspecific variation in mainland-island differentiation, which increases with gyne body size. Our results reveal population differences across an assemblage of interacting species and illuminate general patterns of insularization in ants. Compared to single-species studies, our analysis of nine conspecific population pairs from the same island-mainland system offers a powerful approach to studying fundamental evolutionary processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1685-1698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpae103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpae103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

岛屿生物群落为研究进化过程提供了无与伦比的机会。例如,创始人效应和瓶颈通常会降低岛屿种群的遗传多样性,而减少扩散的选择则会增加种群结构。鉴于对这些普遍性的支持大多来自单物种分析,因此需要进行集合水平的比较,以阐明(i)殖民如何影响相互作用的岛屿生物的基因库,以及(ii)生物集合内部的遗传分化模式是如何变化的。在这里,我们利用来自超保守元素(UCE)的全基因组序列数据,比较了南加州沿海地区九种蚂蚁的大陆种群和岛屿种群的遗传多样性和种群结构。不出所料,与大陆种群(来自隆波克山谷)相比,岛屿种群(来自圣克鲁斯岛)的预期杂合度和沃特森θ较低。然而,岛屿种群样本间的遗传距离较小,表明种群细分程度较低。在焦点种群中,成对的 Fst 值显示出大陆与岛屿之间存在明显的种间差异,这种差异随着雌鸟体型的增大而增大。我们的研究结果揭示了相互影响的物种群的种群差异,并阐明了蚂蚁岛化的一般模式。与单一物种研究相比,我们对来自同一岛屿-大陆系统的九个同种种群对的分析为研究基本进化过程提供了一种强有力的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assemblage-level comparison of genetic diversity and population genetic structure between island and mainland ant populations.

Island biotas provide unparalleled opportunities to examine evolutionary processes. Founder effects and bottlenecks, e.g., typically decrease genetic diversity in island populations, while selection for reduced dispersal can increase population structure. Given that support for these generalities mostly comes from single-species analyses, assemblage-level comparisons are needed to clarify how (i) colonization affects the gene pools of interacting insular organisms, and (ii) patterns of genetic differentiation vary within assemblages of organisms. Here, we use genome-wide sequence data from ultraconserved elements (UCEs) to compare the genetic diversity and population structure of mainland and island populations of nine ant species in coastal southern California. As expected, island populations (from Santa Cruz Island) had lower expected heterozygosity and Watterson's theta compared to mainland populations (from the Lompoc Valley). Island populations, however, exhibited smaller genetic distances among samples, indicating less population subdivision. Within the focal assemblage, pairwise Fst values revealed pronounced interspecific variation in mainland-island differentiation, which increases with gyne body size. Our results reveal population differences across an assemblage of interacting species and illuminate general patterns of insularization in ants. Compared to single-species studies, our analysis of nine conspecific population pairs from the same island-mainland system offers a powerful approach to studying fundamental evolutionary processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution
Evolution 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution, published for the Society for the Study of Evolution, is the premier publication devoted to the study of organic evolution and the integration of the various fields of science concerned with evolution. The journal presents significant and original results that extend our understanding of evolutionary phenomena and processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信