增强腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术后恢复 - 系统性综述。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Antonio Mihai Istrate, Dragos Serban, Horia Doran, Corneliu Tudor, Florin Bobirca, Dragos Davitoiu, Dan Dumitrescu, Andrei Popescu, Matei Popa Cherecheanu, Ciprian Tanasescu, Ion Motofei
{"title":"增强腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术后恢复 - 系统性综述。","authors":"Antonio Mihai Istrate, Dragos Serban, Horia Doran, Corneliu Tudor, Florin Bobirca, Dragos Davitoiu, Dan Dumitrescu, Andrei Popescu, Matei Popa Cherecheanu, Ciprian Tanasescu, Ion Motofei","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a modern concept that aims to improve the perioperative patient care by implementing an evidence-based, patient-centered team approach. This paper aims to analyze the outcome, variations and limits of the ERAS-protocols used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a systematic review on PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science to document the outcomes of applying various ERAS protocols in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 papers, totaling 1453 patients that underwent LC, were included in the qualitative analysis. ERAS-protocols applied in those studies include various pre-, intra- and postoperative measures intended to boost the surgical recovery of the patients and shorten their hospital stay, without exposing them to hazardous encounters. <b>Results:</b> Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within an ERAS-specific protocol are proven to have lower levels of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, with no statistically significant risk of postoperative complications. The postoperative results show that ERAS-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, that may shorten the postoperative recovery after LC. <b>Conclusions:</b> Further studies are needed to establish a consensus regarding the perioperative protocol, before implementing ERAS for LC in clinical routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 3","pages":"318-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Mihai Istrate, Dragos Serban, Horia Doran, Corneliu Tudor, Florin Bobirca, Dragos Davitoiu, Dan Dumitrescu, Andrei Popescu, Matei Popa Cherecheanu, Ciprian Tanasescu, Ion Motofei\",\"doi\":\"10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a modern concept that aims to improve the perioperative patient care by implementing an evidence-based, patient-centered team approach. This paper aims to analyze the outcome, variations and limits of the ERAS-protocols used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a systematic review on PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science to document the outcomes of applying various ERAS protocols in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 papers, totaling 1453 patients that underwent LC, were included in the qualitative analysis. ERAS-protocols applied in those studies include various pre-, intra- and postoperative measures intended to boost the surgical recovery of the patients and shorten their hospital stay, without exposing them to hazardous encounters. <b>Results:</b> Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within an ERAS-specific protocol are proven to have lower levels of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, with no statistically significant risk of postoperative complications. The postoperative results show that ERAS-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, that may shorten the postoperative recovery after LC. <b>Conclusions:</b> Further studies are needed to establish a consensus regarding the perioperative protocol, before implementing ERAS for LC in clinical routine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"119 3\",\"pages\":\"318-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.3.p.318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:术后加强恢复(ERAS)是一个现代概念,旨在通过实施以证据为基础、以患者为中心的团队方法来改善围手术期患者护理。本文旨在分析用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的 ERAS 方案的结果、变化和局限性。方法:我们在 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Web of Science 上进行了系统性综述,记录了在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中应用各种 ERAS 方案的结果。采用纳入和排除标准后,共有 8 篇论文被纳入定性分析,共涉及 1453 名接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。这些研究中采用的 ERAS 方案包括各种术前、术中和术后措施,旨在促进患者的手术恢复并缩短住院时间,同时避免患者遭遇危险。研究结果在 ERAS 特定方案下接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者术后疼痛、恶心和呕吐的程度较低,术后并发症的风险也没有统计学意义。术后结果表明,ERAS-腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种可行且安全的手术,可缩短胆囊切除术后的恢复期。结论:在临床常规实施ERAS胆囊切除术之前,还需要进一步研究,就围术期方案达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - A Systematic Review.

Background and aim: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a modern concept that aims to improve the perioperative patient care by implementing an evidence-based, patient-centered team approach. This paper aims to analyze the outcome, variations and limits of the ERAS-protocols used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic review on PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science to document the outcomes of applying various ERAS protocols in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 papers, totaling 1453 patients that underwent LC, were included in the qualitative analysis. ERAS-protocols applied in those studies include various pre-, intra- and postoperative measures intended to boost the surgical recovery of the patients and shorten their hospital stay, without exposing them to hazardous encounters. Results: Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within an ERAS-specific protocol are proven to have lower levels of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, with no statistically significant risk of postoperative complications. The postoperative results show that ERAS-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, that may shorten the postoperative recovery after LC. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to establish a consensus regarding the perioperative protocol, before implementing ERAS for LC in clinical routine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信