在诊断前交叉韧带损伤的内侧和外侧半月板撕裂时,磁共振成像出现假阳性和假阴性的风险因素。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s00256-024-04745-w
Stephanie Chahwan, Charlotte Charbel, Esther Tannoury, Anthony El Alam, Joeffroy Otayek, Joe Ghanimeh, Alfred Khoury, Pascale Salameh, Sahar Semaan
{"title":"在诊断前交叉韧带损伤的内侧和外侧半月板撕裂时,磁共振成像出现假阳性和假阴性的风险因素。","authors":"Stephanie Chahwan, Charlotte Charbel, Esther Tannoury, Anthony El Alam, Joeffroy Otayek, Joe Ghanimeh, Alfred Khoury, Pascale Salameh, Sahar Semaan","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04745-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI in evaluating meniscal abnormalities in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and recognize predictors of false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) MRI diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four hundred twenty patients (mean age, 27.2 years; 326 males, 94 females) who underwent arthroscopy for ACL injury between January 2017 and August 2022, and had preoperative imaging within 4 months, were retrospectively included. Images were independently interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, noting the presence of medial and lateral meniscal tears including tear type and location. Results were correlated with arthroscopic findings. Multivariate logistic regression was implemented to study risk factors (RF) for FP and FN MRI diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value/accuracy of MRI for medial meniscus tear was 97.5%/74.46%/65.63%/98.35%/82.15%; for lateral meniscus tear, it was 83.5%/93.70%/70.8%/94.55% /87.86%, with substantial interreader agreement. Female gender (odds ratio (OR), 0.434), posterior horn and posterior root tears (OR, 3.268/22.588), horizontal tear (OR, 3.134), and ramp lesion (OR, 4.964) were found RF for FP medial meniscus, and meniscal body tears (OR, 308.011) were found RF for FP lateral meniscus. RF for FN medial meniscus were meniscal tear at the posterior horn, body, and posterior root (OR, 12.371/123.000/13.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI is an effective screening tool for meniscal tears, but less accurate in detecting all medial meniscus injuries. Gender, meniscal tear location, and type increased the risk of FP medial meniscal tear on MRI, while meniscal tear location increased the risk of FP lateral meniscus and FN medial meniscus tears.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"303-315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for false positive and false negative MRI in diagnosing medial and lateral meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Chahwan, Charlotte Charbel, Esther Tannoury, Anthony El Alam, Joeffroy Otayek, Joe Ghanimeh, Alfred Khoury, Pascale Salameh, Sahar Semaan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00256-024-04745-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI in evaluating meniscal abnormalities in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and recognize predictors of false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) MRI diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four hundred twenty patients (mean age, 27.2 years; 326 males, 94 females) who underwent arthroscopy for ACL injury between January 2017 and August 2022, and had preoperative imaging within 4 months, were retrospectively included. Images were independently interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, noting the presence of medial and lateral meniscal tears including tear type and location. Results were correlated with arthroscopic findings. Multivariate logistic regression was implemented to study risk factors (RF) for FP and FN MRI diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value/accuracy of MRI for medial meniscus tear was 97.5%/74.46%/65.63%/98.35%/82.15%; for lateral meniscus tear, it was 83.5%/93.70%/70.8%/94.55% /87.86%, with substantial interreader agreement. Female gender (odds ratio (OR), 0.434), posterior horn and posterior root tears (OR, 3.268/22.588), horizontal tear (OR, 3.134), and ramp lesion (OR, 4.964) were found RF for FP medial meniscus, and meniscal body tears (OR, 308.011) were found RF for FP lateral meniscus. RF for FN medial meniscus were meniscal tear at the posterior horn, body, and posterior root (OR, 12.371/123.000/13.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI is an effective screening tool for meniscal tears, but less accurate in detecting all medial meniscus injuries. Gender, meniscal tear location, and type increased the risk of FP medial meniscal tear on MRI, while meniscal tear location increased the risk of FP lateral meniscus and FN medial meniscus tears.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"303-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skeletal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04745-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04745-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定 MRI 在评估前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤时半月板异常的诊断性能,并识别 MRI 假阳性(FP)和假阴性(FN)诊断的预测因素:回顾性纳入2017年1月至2022年8月期间因前交叉韧带损伤接受关节镜手术的420例患者(平均年龄27.2岁;男性326例,女性94例),这些患者在4个月内接受过术前影像学检查。图像由两名经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生独立解读,注意是否存在内侧和外侧半月板撕裂,包括撕裂类型和位置。结果与关节镜检查结果相关。采用多变量逻辑回归法研究FP和FN MRI诊断的风险因素(RF):结果:MRI对内侧半月板撕裂的敏感性/特异性/阳性预测值/阴性预测值/准确性分别为97.5%/74.46%/65.63%/98.35%/82.15%;对外侧半月板撕裂的敏感性/特异性/阳性预测值/阴性预测值/准确性分别为83.5%/93.70%/70.8%/94.55%/87.86%,读片者之间的一致性很高。发现女性性别(比值比(OR),0.434)、后角和后根撕裂(OR,3.268/22.588)、水平撕裂(OR,3.134)和斜坡病变(OR,4.964)是FP内侧半月板的RF,半月板体撕裂(OR,308.011)是FP外侧半月板的RF。FN内侧半月板的RF为半月板后角、本体和后根部撕裂(OR,12.371/123.000/13.045):结论:磁共振成像是筛查半月板撕裂的有效工具,但在检测所有内侧半月板损伤方面的准确性较低。性别、半月板撕裂位置和类型会增加 MRI 上 FP 内侧半月板撕裂的风险,而半月板撕裂位置会增加 FP 外侧半月板和 FN 内侧半月板撕裂的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risk factors for false positive and false negative MRI in diagnosing medial and lateral meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury.

Risk factors for false positive and false negative MRI in diagnosing medial and lateral meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI in evaluating meniscal abnormalities in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and recognize predictors of false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) MRI diagnosis.

Material and methods: Four hundred twenty patients (mean age, 27.2 years; 326 males, 94 females) who underwent arthroscopy for ACL injury between January 2017 and August 2022, and had preoperative imaging within 4 months, were retrospectively included. Images were independently interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, noting the presence of medial and lateral meniscal tears including tear type and location. Results were correlated with arthroscopic findings. Multivariate logistic regression was implemented to study risk factors (RF) for FP and FN MRI diagnosis.

Results: The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value/accuracy of MRI for medial meniscus tear was 97.5%/74.46%/65.63%/98.35%/82.15%; for lateral meniscus tear, it was 83.5%/93.70%/70.8%/94.55% /87.86%, with substantial interreader agreement. Female gender (odds ratio (OR), 0.434), posterior horn and posterior root tears (OR, 3.268/22.588), horizontal tear (OR, 3.134), and ramp lesion (OR, 4.964) were found RF for FP medial meniscus, and meniscal body tears (OR, 308.011) were found RF for FP lateral meniscus. RF for FN medial meniscus were meniscal tear at the posterior horn, body, and posterior root (OR, 12.371/123.000/13.045).

Conclusion: MRI is an effective screening tool for meniscal tears, but less accurate in detecting all medial meniscus injuries. Gender, meniscal tear location, and type increased the risk of FP medial meniscal tear on MRI, while meniscal tear location increased the risk of FP lateral meniscus and FN medial meniscus tears.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信