[Tardieu量表在评估脑血管疾病成人上肢痉挛方面的有效性和可靠性。系统综述]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
E Roldán-González, F J Gómez-Rodríguez, S J Jácome-Velasco, Y Riascos-Forero, L A Rosas-Roldán, M L Hurtado-Otero, A V Sarria-Gómez
{"title":"[Tardieu量表在评估脑血管疾病成人上肢痉挛方面的有效性和可靠性。系统综述]。","authors":"E Roldán-González, F J Gómez-Rodríguez, S J Jácome-Velasco, Y Riascos-Forero, L A Rosas-Roldán, M L Hurtado-Otero, A V Sarria-Gómez","doi":"10.33588/rn.7902.2024093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The increase in the number of people with upper limb spasticity as a sequela of cerebrovascular disease, which negatively impacts their autonomy, functional independence and participation, and affects their quality of life, calls for the application of precise and objective instruments for its measurement and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the validity and reliability of the Tardieu scale in the evaluation of upper extremity spasticity in adults with cerebrovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The search strategy was implemented in eight databases; the systematic review protocol was registered beforehand in INPLASY (with registration no. 2023110076). The evidence was synthesised in three phases: a tabular presentation of results, an evaluation of the quality of the articles, and a narrative synthesis of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only three of the 33 articles identified fulfilled the variables that enable the validity and reliability of the Tardieu scale to be established. The measurements of angles and velocities R1, R2 and R2-R1 were analysed. Student's t-test to assess the reliability between the measurements of R1 and R2; and angles R2 and R2-R1 showed statistical significance, which confirmed the reliability of the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Tardieu scale proved robust. It is important to note that the sample size, the time of evolution of the disease and the age of the patients may influence the results of the scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validity and reliability of the Tardieu scale for assessing upper limb spasticity in adults with cerebrovascular disease. Systematic review].\",\"authors\":\"E Roldán-González, F J Gómez-Rodríguez, S J Jácome-Velasco, Y Riascos-Forero, L A Rosas-Roldán, M L Hurtado-Otero, A V Sarria-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.33588/rn.7902.2024093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The increase in the number of people with upper limb spasticity as a sequela of cerebrovascular disease, which negatively impacts their autonomy, functional independence and participation, and affects their quality of life, calls for the application of precise and objective instruments for its measurement and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the validity and reliability of the Tardieu scale in the evaluation of upper extremity spasticity in adults with cerebrovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The search strategy was implemented in eight databases; the systematic review protocol was registered beforehand in INPLASY (with registration no. 2023110076). The evidence was synthesised in three phases: a tabular presentation of results, an evaluation of the quality of the articles, and a narrative synthesis of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only three of the 33 articles identified fulfilled the variables that enable the validity and reliability of the Tardieu scale to be established. The measurements of angles and velocities R1, R2 and R2-R1 were analysed. Student's t-test to assess the reliability between the measurements of R1 and R2; and angles R2 and R2-R1 showed statistical significance, which confirmed the reliability of the scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Tardieu scale proved robust. It is important to note that the sample size, the time of evolution of the disease and the age of the patients may influence the results of the scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469098/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7902.2024093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7902.2024093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:上肢痉挛是脑血管疾病的后遗症,对患者的自主性、功能独立性和参与性造成了负面影响,并影响了他们的生活质量:评估 Tardieu 量表在评估成人脑血管疾病患者上肢痉挛时的有效性和可靠性:在八个数据库中实施了检索策略;系统综述方案事先在 INPLASY(注册号:2023110076)中进行了注册。证据综合分为三个阶段:结果列表、文章质量评估和结果叙述性综合:结果:在 33 篇文章中,只有三篇符合确定 Tardieu 量表有效性和可靠性的变量。对角度和速度 R1、R2 和 R2-R1 的测量结果进行了分析。通过学生 t 检验评估了 R1 和 R2、R2 和 R2-R1 角度测量值之间的可靠性,结果显示统计学意义显著,这证实了量表的可靠性:Tardieu 量表证明是可靠的。值得注意的是,样本量、疾病演变时间和患者年龄都可能影响量表的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Validity and reliability of the Tardieu scale for assessing upper limb spasticity in adults with cerebrovascular disease. Systematic review].

Introduction: The increase in the number of people with upper limb spasticity as a sequela of cerebrovascular disease, which negatively impacts their autonomy, functional independence and participation, and affects their quality of life, calls for the application of precise and objective instruments for its measurement and evaluation.

Objective: To assess the validity and reliability of the Tardieu scale in the evaluation of upper extremity spasticity in adults with cerebrovascular disease.

Materials and methods: The search strategy was implemented in eight databases; the systematic review protocol was registered beforehand in INPLASY (with registration no. 2023110076). The evidence was synthesised in three phases: a tabular presentation of results, an evaluation of the quality of the articles, and a narrative synthesis of the findings.

Results: Only three of the 33 articles identified fulfilled the variables that enable the validity and reliability of the Tardieu scale to be established. The measurements of angles and velocities R1, R2 and R2-R1 were analysed. Student's t-test to assess the reliability between the measurements of R1 and R2; and angles R2 and R2-R1 showed statistical significance, which confirmed the reliability of the scale.

Conclusions: The Tardieu scale proved robust. It is important to note that the sample size, the time of evolution of the disease and the age of the patients may influence the results of the scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信