美国多机构无细胞疗法服务调查。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Nalan Yurtsever, Jeremy W. Jacobs, Garrett S. Booth, Joseph Schwartz, Yara A. Park, Jennifer S. Woo, Deisen Lauro, Sarina Torres, Dawn C. Ward, Laura D. Stephens, Elizabeth S. Allen, Christopher A. Tormey, Brian D. Adkins
{"title":"美国多机构无细胞疗法服务调查。","authors":"Nalan Yurtsever,&nbsp;Jeremy W. Jacobs,&nbsp;Garrett S. Booth,&nbsp;Joseph Schwartz,&nbsp;Yara A. Park,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Woo,&nbsp;Deisen Lauro,&nbsp;Sarina Torres,&nbsp;Dawn C. Ward,&nbsp;Laura D. Stephens,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Allen,&nbsp;Christopher A. Tormey,&nbsp;Brian D. Adkins","doi":"10.1002/jca.22138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Apheresis practices in the United States (US) have not been comprehensively characterized to date. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating apheresis therapy through a national survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multi-institutional survey was conducted between April and July 2023. The survey, comprising 54 questions, focused on institutional demographics, procedures, equipment, staffing, training, and impacts of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Responses from 22 institutions, primarily academic medical centers, were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was the most common procedure, followed by hematopoietic progenitor cell collection (HPC-A) and red blood cell exchange (RCE). CAR-T cell collections were widespread, with some institutions supporting over 30 protocols concurrently. Most sites used the Spectra Optia Apheresis System, were managed by a transfusion medicine service, and employed internal apheresis providers. Insufficient staffing levels, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, were common and most often addressed using overtime.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The survey highlighted the ubiquity of TPE, expanding cellular collections and staffing challenges. The role of apheresis in supporting cellular therapy, particularly in newly developing cell and gene therapies and clinical trials, was evident. Staffing issues during the pandemic emphasized the need for innovative recruitment strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This nationwide survey provides the most comprehensive analysis to date of apheresis practices in large US academic centers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.22138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-institutional survey of apheresis services among institutions in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Nalan Yurtsever,&nbsp;Jeremy W. Jacobs,&nbsp;Garrett S. Booth,&nbsp;Joseph Schwartz,&nbsp;Yara A. Park,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Woo,&nbsp;Deisen Lauro,&nbsp;Sarina Torres,&nbsp;Dawn C. Ward,&nbsp;Laura D. Stephens,&nbsp;Elizabeth S. Allen,&nbsp;Christopher A. Tormey,&nbsp;Brian D. Adkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jca.22138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Apheresis practices in the United States (US) have not been comprehensively characterized to date. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating apheresis therapy through a national survey.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multi-institutional survey was conducted between April and July 2023. The survey, comprising 54 questions, focused on institutional demographics, procedures, equipment, staffing, training, and impacts of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Responses from 22 institutions, primarily academic medical centers, were analyzed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was the most common procedure, followed by hematopoietic progenitor cell collection (HPC-A) and red blood cell exchange (RCE). CAR-T cell collections were widespread, with some institutions supporting over 30 protocols concurrently. Most sites used the Spectra Optia Apheresis System, were managed by a transfusion medicine service, and employed internal apheresis providers. Insufficient staffing levels, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, were common and most often addressed using overtime.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The survey highlighted the ubiquity of TPE, expanding cellular collections and staffing challenges. The role of apheresis in supporting cellular therapy, particularly in newly developing cell and gene therapies and clinical trials, was evident. Staffing issues during the pandemic emphasized the need for innovative recruitment strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This nationwide survey provides the most comprehensive analysis to date of apheresis practices in large US academic centers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jca.22138\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:迄今为止,美国(US)的无细胞疗法尚未得到全面描述。本研究旨在通过一项全国性调查对无细胞疗法进行评估,从而弥补这一空白:方法:2023 年 4 月至 7 月期间进行了一次多机构调查。调查包括 54 个问题,主要涉及机构人口统计学、程序、设备、人员配备、培训以及 2019 年冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)大流行的影响。对来自 22 家机构(主要是学术医疗中心)的答复进行了分析:结果:治疗性血浆置换(TPE)是最常见的程序,其次是造血祖细胞采集(HPC-A)和红细胞置换(RCE)。CAR-T 细胞采集非常普遍,有些机构同时支持 30 多个方案。大多数医疗机构使用 Spectra Optia 无细胞采集系统,由输血医学服务机构管理,并聘用内部无细胞采集服务提供者。因 COVID-19 大流行而加剧的人员配备不足现象十分普遍,最常见的解决方法是加班:讨论:调查强调了 TPE 的普遍性、不断扩大的细胞收集和人员配置方面的挑战。无细胞疗法在支持细胞疗法方面的作用显而易见,特别是在新开发的细胞和基因疗法以及临床试验中。大流行期间的人员配备问题强调了创新招募策略的必要性:这项全国范围的调查对美国大型学术中心的无细胞疗法实践进行了迄今为止最全面的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A multi-institutional survey of apheresis services among institutions in the United States

A multi-institutional survey of apheresis services among institutions in the United States

Introduction

Apheresis practices in the United States (US) have not been comprehensively characterized to date. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating apheresis therapy through a national survey.

Methods

A multi-institutional survey was conducted between April and July 2023. The survey, comprising 54 questions, focused on institutional demographics, procedures, equipment, staffing, training, and impacts of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Responses from 22 institutions, primarily academic medical centers, were analyzed.

Results

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was the most common procedure, followed by hematopoietic progenitor cell collection (HPC-A) and red blood cell exchange (RCE). CAR-T cell collections were widespread, with some institutions supporting over 30 protocols concurrently. Most sites used the Spectra Optia Apheresis System, were managed by a transfusion medicine service, and employed internal apheresis providers. Insufficient staffing levels, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, were common and most often addressed using overtime.

Discussion

The survey highlighted the ubiquity of TPE, expanding cellular collections and staffing challenges. The role of apheresis in supporting cellular therapy, particularly in newly developing cell and gene therapies and clinical trials, was evident. Staffing issues during the pandemic emphasized the need for innovative recruitment strategies.

Conclusion

This nationwide survey provides the most comprehensive analysis to date of apheresis practices in large US academic centers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信