认知行为疗法(CBT)干预中参与疗程间工作的预测因素:混合方法系统综述和 "最合适 "框架综合。

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1080/16506073.2024.2369939
Mia Bennion, Karina Lovell, Amy Blakemore, Emily Vicary, Penny Bee
{"title":"认知行为疗法(CBT)干预中参与疗程间工作的预测因素:混合方法系统综述和 \"最合适 \"框架综合。","authors":"Mia Bennion, Karina Lovell, Amy Blakemore, Emily Vicary, Penny Bee","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2024.2369939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between-session work (BSW) acts as the vehicle to translate skills learnt in therapy sessions into adaptive changes in everyday life, a key goal in Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (CBT). Despite a well-established relationship between engagement with BSW and enhanced treatment outcomes, difficulties completing between-session tasks are common and factors affecting patient engagement with BSW are poorly understood. This mixed-methods systematic review and \"best fit\" framework synthesis explored predictors of engagement with BSW in CBT-based interventions. Comprehensive searches were conducted across five databases, identifying 59 eligible studies. This combined theory and empirical evidence approach depicted ten predictor themes related to between-session engagement, spanning individual, relational and contextual concepts. While ambiguous findings were generated by existing evidence, several factors emerged as relatively consistent predictors of engagement with BSW: positive patient beliefs regarding BSW and treatment such as perceived helpfulness, and practitioner competency in planning and reviewing BSW, including providing a rationale and addressing difficulties were associated with greater engagement. Conversely, patient in-session resistance, including counter change talk, was an indicator of disengagement between-sessions. The impact of patient symptomology, sociocultural environment, practitioner beliefs and the therapeutic relationship is unclear. The conceptual model presented offers a testable framework for researchers and a guideline for practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"41-77"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of engagement with between-session work in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based interventions: a mixed-methods systematic review and \\\"best fit\\\" framework synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Mia Bennion, Karina Lovell, Amy Blakemore, Emily Vicary, Penny Bee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16506073.2024.2369939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Between-session work (BSW) acts as the vehicle to translate skills learnt in therapy sessions into adaptive changes in everyday life, a key goal in Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (CBT). Despite a well-established relationship between engagement with BSW and enhanced treatment outcomes, difficulties completing between-session tasks are common and factors affecting patient engagement with BSW are poorly understood. This mixed-methods systematic review and \\\"best fit\\\" framework synthesis explored predictors of engagement with BSW in CBT-based interventions. Comprehensive searches were conducted across five databases, identifying 59 eligible studies. This combined theory and empirical evidence approach depicted ten predictor themes related to between-session engagement, spanning individual, relational and contextual concepts. While ambiguous findings were generated by existing evidence, several factors emerged as relatively consistent predictors of engagement with BSW: positive patient beliefs regarding BSW and treatment such as perceived helpfulness, and practitioner competency in planning and reviewing BSW, including providing a rationale and addressing difficulties were associated with greater engagement. Conversely, patient in-session resistance, including counter change talk, was an indicator of disengagement between-sessions. The impact of patient symptomology, sociocultural environment, practitioner beliefs and the therapeutic relationship is unclear. The conceptual model presented offers a testable framework for researchers and a guideline for practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"41-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2024.2369939\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2024.2369939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

会间工作(BSW)是将治疗过程中学到的技能转化为日常生活中适应性改变的载体,也是认知行为疗法(CBT)的一个关键目标。尽管参与 BSW 与提高治疗效果之间的关系已得到证实,但完成疗程间任务的困难却很常见,而影响患者参与 BSW 的因素却鲜为人知。这项混合方法系统综述和 "最适合 "框架综合研究探讨了在基于 CBT 的干预中参与 BSW 的预测因素。我们在五个数据库中进行了全面检索,确定了 59 项符合条件的研究。这种理论与实证相结合的方法描绘了与疗程间参与相关的十个预测主题,涵盖了个人、关系和环境概念。虽然现有证据得出的结论模棱两可,但有几个因素相对一致地预测了患者对 BSW 的参与度:患者对 BSW 和治疗的积极信念(如感知到的帮助),以及从业人员在规划和审查 BSW(包括提供理由和解决困难)方面的能力与更大的参与度相关。相反,病人在治疗过程中的抵触情绪,包括反驳改变的言论,是在治疗过程之间脱离治疗的指标。病人的症状、社会文化环境、从业者的信念和治疗关系的影响尚不清楚。所提出的概念模型为研究人员提供了一个可检验的框架,也为从业人员提供了一个指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of engagement with between-session work in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)-based interventions: a mixed-methods systematic review and "best fit" framework synthesis.

Between-session work (BSW) acts as the vehicle to translate skills learnt in therapy sessions into adaptive changes in everyday life, a key goal in Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (CBT). Despite a well-established relationship between engagement with BSW and enhanced treatment outcomes, difficulties completing between-session tasks are common and factors affecting patient engagement with BSW are poorly understood. This mixed-methods systematic review and "best fit" framework synthesis explored predictors of engagement with BSW in CBT-based interventions. Comprehensive searches were conducted across five databases, identifying 59 eligible studies. This combined theory and empirical evidence approach depicted ten predictor themes related to between-session engagement, spanning individual, relational and contextual concepts. While ambiguous findings were generated by existing evidence, several factors emerged as relatively consistent predictors of engagement with BSW: positive patient beliefs regarding BSW and treatment such as perceived helpfulness, and practitioner competency in planning and reviewing BSW, including providing a rationale and addressing difficulties were associated with greater engagement. Conversely, patient in-session resistance, including counter change talk, was an indicator of disengagement between-sessions. The impact of patient symptomology, sociocultural environment, practitioner beliefs and the therapeutic relationship is unclear. The conceptual model presented offers a testable framework for researchers and a guideline for practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信