腹腔镜袖带胃切除术后的腹腔引流管:是否应该使用?

Lucía Aragone, Francisco Thibaud, Mariana Tóffolo, Matías Mihura, Daniel E Pirchi
{"title":"腹腔镜袖带胃切除术后的腹腔引流管:是否应该使用?","authors":"Lucía Aragone, Francisco Thibaud, Mariana Tóffolo, Matías Mihura, Daniel E Pirchi","doi":"10.17476/jmbs.2024.13.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide for the treatment of morbid obesity. Blake-type drains are widely used in this procedure despite the lack of clear evidence regarding their benefits in the diagnosis and treatment of common postoperative complications such as gastric suture line leak (GSLL) and postoperative bleeding (PB).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective descriptive study with prospective case registry was conducted, analyzing all patients who underwent LSG between January 2012 and December 2022 at a high-volume center. Our primary outcome was to evaluate the role of drains for diagnosis and treatment of GSLL and PB in LSG. Our secondary outcome was to determine drain related surgical site infection (DRSSI) rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 335 LSG were performed in the studied period. In all patients one abdominal drain was placed during surgery. Six GSLL (1.79%) and 5 PB (1.49%) were recorded. Drain placement did not prove to ensure early diagnosis or conservative management of GSLL or PB after LSG. Furthermore, an incidence of DRSSI of 4.1% (14 patients) was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, no clear diagnostic or therapeutic benefits of the systematic use of drains for GSLL or PB in LSG was found; but drain use did show a considerable rate of DRSSI, which must be taken into consideration prior to considering drain systematic use. While no randomized prospective trials have been performed, the retrospective data does not support drain systematic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abdominal Drains After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Should They Be Used?\",\"authors\":\"Lucía Aragone, Francisco Thibaud, Mariana Tóffolo, Matías Mihura, Daniel E Pirchi\",\"doi\":\"10.17476/jmbs.2024.13.1.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide for the treatment of morbid obesity. Blake-type drains are widely used in this procedure despite the lack of clear evidence regarding their benefits in the diagnosis and treatment of common postoperative complications such as gastric suture line leak (GSLL) and postoperative bleeding (PB).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective descriptive study with prospective case registry was conducted, analyzing all patients who underwent LSG between January 2012 and December 2022 at a high-volume center. Our primary outcome was to evaluate the role of drains for diagnosis and treatment of GSLL and PB in LSG. Our secondary outcome was to determine drain related surgical site infection (DRSSI) rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 335 LSG were performed in the studied period. In all patients one abdominal drain was placed during surgery. Six GSLL (1.79%) and 5 PB (1.49%) were recorded. Drain placement did not prove to ensure early diagnosis or conservative management of GSLL or PB after LSG. Furthermore, an incidence of DRSSI of 4.1% (14 patients) was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, no clear diagnostic or therapeutic benefits of the systematic use of drains for GSLL or PB in LSG was found; but drain use did show a considerable rate of DRSSI, which must be taken into consideration prior to considering drain systematic use. While no randomized prospective trials have been performed, the retrospective data does not support drain systematic use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224003/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2024.13.1.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17476/jmbs.2024.13.1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)是全球治疗病态肥胖症最常见的外科手术之一。尽管尚无明确证据表明腹腔引流管在诊断和治疗胃缝合线渗漏(GSLL)和术后出血(PB)等常见术后并发症方面具有优势,但腹腔引流管仍被广泛应用于该手术中:我们进行了一项带有前瞻性病例登记的回顾性描述性研究,分析了 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在一家大型中心接受胃缝线术的所有患者。我们的主要结果是评估引流管在 LSG 中诊断和治疗 GSLL 和 PB 的作用。我们的次要结果是确定引流管相关手术部位感染率(DRSSI):研究期间共进行了 335 例 LSG。所有患者在手术期间都放置了腹腔引流管。共记录到 6 例 GSLL(1.79%)和 5 例 PB(1.49%)。事实证明,放置引流管并不能确保LSG术后GSLL或PB的早期诊断或保守治疗。此外,我们还发现 DRSSI 的发生率为 4.1%(14 名患者):在我们的研究中,没有发现在 LSG 中系统性使用引流管对 GSLL 或 PB 有明显的诊断或治疗效果;但引流管的使用确实显示出相当高的 DRSSI 发生率,在考虑系统性使用引流管之前必须考虑到这一点。虽然没有进行过随机前瞻性试验,但回顾性数据并不支持系统性使用引流管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abdominal Drains After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Should They Be Used?

Purpose: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide for the treatment of morbid obesity. Blake-type drains are widely used in this procedure despite the lack of clear evidence regarding their benefits in the diagnosis and treatment of common postoperative complications such as gastric suture line leak (GSLL) and postoperative bleeding (PB).

Materials and methods: A retrospective descriptive study with prospective case registry was conducted, analyzing all patients who underwent LSG between January 2012 and December 2022 at a high-volume center. Our primary outcome was to evaluate the role of drains for diagnosis and treatment of GSLL and PB in LSG. Our secondary outcome was to determine drain related surgical site infection (DRSSI) rate.

Results: A total of 335 LSG were performed in the studied period. In all patients one abdominal drain was placed during surgery. Six GSLL (1.79%) and 5 PB (1.49%) were recorded. Drain placement did not prove to ensure early diagnosis or conservative management of GSLL or PB after LSG. Furthermore, an incidence of DRSSI of 4.1% (14 patients) was found.

Conclusion: In our study, no clear diagnostic or therapeutic benefits of the systematic use of drains for GSLL or PB in LSG was found; but drain use did show a considerable rate of DRSSI, which must be taken into consideration prior to considering drain systematic use. While no randomized prospective trials have been performed, the retrospective data does not support drain systematic use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信