与痴呆症事件相关的神经精神障碍的种族/族裔差异。

IF 4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Elizabeth A Wise, Haijuan Yan, Esther Oh, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos
{"title":"与痴呆症事件相关的神经精神障碍的种族/族裔差异。","authors":"Elizabeth A Wise, Haijuan Yan, Esther Oh, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos","doi":"10.1002/dad2.12615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are nearly universal in dementia; some cross-sectional studies of NPS in dementia have found racial/ethnic differences, though it is unknown if NPS prevalence differs among racial/ethnic groups before and after dementia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were followed annually at Alzheimer's Disease Centers and were assessed on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) with at least one follow-up visit at which they were diagnosed with dementia. Descriptive statistics were generated by race/ethnicity. NPS were modeled over time as a function of race/ethnicity and with diagnosis date as the baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPS were present in 95% in at least one time point. After adjusting for covariates, there were no statistically significant differences in NPI-Q total scores among racial/ethnic groups at the time of and after dementia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from our prospective cohort study suggest that when individuals are matched at the time of conversion to dementia, there are no racial/ethnic differences in NPS.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia are frequent and increase caregiver burden.Prior studies reported more neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in Black compared to White individuals with dementia.National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Black, White, and Hispanic participants did not differ in NPS at the time of dementia diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"16 3","pages":"e12615"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial/ethnic differences in neuropsychiatric disturbances associated with incident dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A Wise, Haijuan Yan, Esther Oh, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dad2.12615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are nearly universal in dementia; some cross-sectional studies of NPS in dementia have found racial/ethnic differences, though it is unknown if NPS prevalence differs among racial/ethnic groups before and after dementia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were followed annually at Alzheimer's Disease Centers and were assessed on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) with at least one follow-up visit at which they were diagnosed with dementia. Descriptive statistics were generated by race/ethnicity. NPS were modeled over time as a function of race/ethnicity and with diagnosis date as the baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPS were present in 95% in at least one time point. After adjusting for covariates, there were no statistically significant differences in NPI-Q total scores among racial/ethnic groups at the time of and after dementia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from our prospective cohort study suggest that when individuals are matched at the time of conversion to dementia, there are no racial/ethnic differences in NPS.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia are frequent and increase caregiver burden.Prior studies reported more neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in Black compared to White individuals with dementia.National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Black, White, and Hispanic participants did not differ in NPS at the time of dementia diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"e12615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:神经精神症状(NPS)几乎是痴呆症的普遍症状;一些关于痴呆症 NPS 的横断面研究发现了种族/族裔差异,但痴呆症诊断前后不同种族/族裔群体的 NPS 患病率是否存在差异尚不清楚:每年在阿尔茨海默病中心对参与者进行随访,并对他们进行神经精神病学调查问卷(NPI-Q)评估,在至少一次随访中他们被诊断出患有痴呆症。按种族/人种进行了描述性统计。NPS 随时间的推移作为种族/族裔的函数并以诊断日期为基线进行建模:在至少一个时间点中,95%的人存在 NPS。在对协变量进行调整后,不同种族/族裔群体在痴呆症确诊时和确诊后的 NPI-Q 总分在统计学上没有显著差异:讨论:我们的前瞻性队列研究结果表明,如果在转为痴呆症时对个体进行匹配,则在 NPS 方面不存在种族/族裔差异:国家阿尔茨海默氏症协调中心(National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center)的黑人、白人和西班牙裔参与者在痴呆症诊断时的神经精神症状(NPS)并无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial/ethnic differences in neuropsychiatric disturbances associated with incident dementia.

Introduction: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are nearly universal in dementia; some cross-sectional studies of NPS in dementia have found racial/ethnic differences, though it is unknown if NPS prevalence differs among racial/ethnic groups before and after dementia diagnosis.

Methods: Participants were followed annually at Alzheimer's Disease Centers and were assessed on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) with at least one follow-up visit at which they were diagnosed with dementia. Descriptive statistics were generated by race/ethnicity. NPS were modeled over time as a function of race/ethnicity and with diagnosis date as the baseline.

Results: NPS were present in 95% in at least one time point. After adjusting for covariates, there were no statistically significant differences in NPI-Q total scores among racial/ethnic groups at the time of and after dementia diagnosis.

Discussion: Findings from our prospective cohort study suggest that when individuals are matched at the time of conversion to dementia, there are no racial/ethnic differences in NPS.

Highlights: Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia are frequent and increase caregiver burden.Prior studies reported more neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in Black compared to White individuals with dementia.National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Black, White, and Hispanic participants did not differ in NPS at the time of dementia diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信