无触摸自主动作中不同感官模式的共同意向束缚效应

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Jiajia Liu , Lihan Chen , Jingjin Gu , Tatia Buidze , Ke Zhao , Chang Hong Liu , Yuanmeng Zhang , Jan Gläscher , Xiaolan Fu
{"title":"无触摸自主动作中不同感官模式的共同意向束缚效应","authors":"Jiajia Liu ,&nbsp;Lihan Chen ,&nbsp;Jingjin Gu ,&nbsp;Tatia Buidze ,&nbsp;Ke Zhao ,&nbsp;Chang Hong Liu ,&nbsp;Yuanmeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Jan Gläscher ,&nbsp;Xiaolan Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The intentional binding effect refers to the phenomenon where the perceived temporal interval between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence is subjectively compressed. Prior research revealed the importance of tactile feedback from the keyboard on this effect. Here we examined the necessity of such tactile feedback by utilizing a touch-free key-press device without haptic feedback, and explored how initial/outcome sensory modalities (visual/auditory/tactile) and their consistency influence the intentional binding effect. Participants estimated three delay lengths (250, 550, or 850 ms) between the initial and outcome stimuli. Results showed that regardless of the combinations of sensory modalities between the initial and the outcome stimuli (i.e., modal consistency), the intentional binding effect was only observed in the 250 ms delay condition. This findings indicate a stable intentional binding effect both within and across sensory modalities, supporting the existence of a shared mechanism underlying the binding effect in touch-free voluntary actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common intentional binding effects across diverse sensory modalities in touch-free voluntary actions\",\"authors\":\"Jiajia Liu ,&nbsp;Lihan Chen ,&nbsp;Jingjin Gu ,&nbsp;Tatia Buidze ,&nbsp;Ke Zhao ,&nbsp;Chang Hong Liu ,&nbsp;Yuanmeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Jan Gläscher ,&nbsp;Xiaolan Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The intentional binding effect refers to the phenomenon where the perceived temporal interval between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence is subjectively compressed. Prior research revealed the importance of tactile feedback from the keyboard on this effect. Here we examined the necessity of such tactile feedback by utilizing a touch-free key-press device without haptic feedback, and explored how initial/outcome sensory modalities (visual/auditory/tactile) and their consistency influence the intentional binding effect. Participants estimated three delay lengths (250, 550, or 850 ms) between the initial and outcome stimuli. Results showed that regardless of the combinations of sensory modalities between the initial and the outcome stimuli (i.e., modal consistency), the intentional binding effect was only observed in the 250 ms delay condition. This findings indicate a stable intentional binding effect both within and across sensory modalities, supporting the existence of a shared mechanism underlying the binding effect in touch-free voluntary actions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意向束缚效应指的是主观上压缩自主动作与其感官结果之间的时间间隔的现象。先前的研究表明,键盘的触觉反馈对这种效应非常重要。在这里,我们通过使用无触觉反馈的免触按键设备来检验这种触觉反馈的必要性,并探索初始/结果感觉模式(视觉/听觉/触觉)及其一致性如何影响有意结合效应。参与者估计了初始刺激和结果刺激之间的三种延迟长度(250、550 或 850 毫秒)。结果显示,无论初始刺激和结果刺激之间的感官模式组合如何(即模式一致性),只有在 250 毫秒延迟条件下才能观察到意向结合效应。这一结果表明,在不同的感觉模式中都存在稳定的意向束缚效应,从而支持了无触摸自主动作中束缚效应的共同机制的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Common intentional binding effects across diverse sensory modalities in touch-free voluntary actions

The intentional binding effect refers to the phenomenon where the perceived temporal interval between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence is subjectively compressed. Prior research revealed the importance of tactile feedback from the keyboard on this effect. Here we examined the necessity of such tactile feedback by utilizing a touch-free key-press device without haptic feedback, and explored how initial/outcome sensory modalities (visual/auditory/tactile) and their consistency influence the intentional binding effect. Participants estimated three delay lengths (250, 550, or 850 ms) between the initial and outcome stimuli. Results showed that regardless of the combinations of sensory modalities between the initial and the outcome stimuli (i.e., modal consistency), the intentional binding effect was only observed in the 250 ms delay condition. This findings indicate a stable intentional binding effect both within and across sensory modalities, supporting the existence of a shared mechanism underlying the binding effect in touch-free voluntary actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信