如何提高聋人或重听学生的勇气?思维方式的影响。

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sanyin Cheng, Li Haochen, Li Jiaqi
{"title":"如何提高聋人或重听学生的勇气?思维方式的影响。","authors":"Sanyin Cheng, Li Haochen, Li Jiaqi","doi":"10.1353/aad.2024.a931188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The researchers examined the associations between thinking styles and grit. A cross-sectional design was adopted, with two weeks of data collection. The Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II and the Grit Scale were administered to 365 signing deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) Arts and Design students and 443 hearing university students in mainland China. CFA, MANOVA, hierarchical multiple regression analyses, and a multi-group analysis were executed for data analysis. DHH and hearing students with Type I styles (i.e., more creativity-generating, less structured, and cognitively more complex) had higher grit levels, with large effect sizes for the identified relationships. There were no differences in the relations for either group. The associations between thinking styles and grit may protect against psychological pressure and rehabilitation problems and enable university/school administrators, counselors, social workers, teachers, parents, and students to enhance the grit of students who are deaf or hard of hearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46988,"journal":{"name":"American Annals of the Deaf","volume":"169 1","pages":"40-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Improve Grit Among Deaf or Hard of Hearing Students: The Effect of Thinking Style.\",\"authors\":\"Sanyin Cheng, Li Haochen, Li Jiaqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/aad.2024.a931188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The researchers examined the associations between thinking styles and grit. A cross-sectional design was adopted, with two weeks of data collection. The Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II and the Grit Scale were administered to 365 signing deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) Arts and Design students and 443 hearing university students in mainland China. CFA, MANOVA, hierarchical multiple regression analyses, and a multi-group analysis were executed for data analysis. DHH and hearing students with Type I styles (i.e., more creativity-generating, less structured, and cognitively more complex) had higher grit levels, with large effect sizes for the identified relationships. There were no differences in the relations for either group. The associations between thinking styles and grit may protect against psychological pressure and rehabilitation problems and enable university/school administrators, counselors, social workers, teachers, parents, and students to enhance the grit of students who are deaf or hard of hearing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Annals of the Deaf\",\"volume\":\"169 1\",\"pages\":\"40-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Annals of the Deaf\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2024.a931188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Annals of the Deaf","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2024.a931188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员考察了思维方式与勇气之间的关联。研究采用横断面设计,数据收集为期两周。研究人员对中国大陆365名手语聋人或重听人(DHH)艺术设计专业学生和443名听力正常的大学生进行了思维风格量表(修订版II)和勇气量表的测量。数据分析采用了 CFA、MANOVA、分层多元回归分析和多组分析。结果表明,具有I型风格(即创造性更强、结构化程度更低、认知更复杂)的DHH和听力学生具有更高的磨砾水平,并且在已确定的关系中具有较大的效应大小。两组之间的关系没有差异。思维方式与勇气之间的关系可以保护聋人或重听学生免受心理压力和康复问题的困扰,并使大学/学校管理人员、辅导员、社会工作者、教师、家长和学生能够提高聋人或重听学生的勇气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Improve Grit Among Deaf or Hard of Hearing Students: The Effect of Thinking Style.

The researchers examined the associations between thinking styles and grit. A cross-sectional design was adopted, with two weeks of data collection. The Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II and the Grit Scale were administered to 365 signing deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) Arts and Design students and 443 hearing university students in mainland China. CFA, MANOVA, hierarchical multiple regression analyses, and a multi-group analysis were executed for data analysis. DHH and hearing students with Type I styles (i.e., more creativity-generating, less structured, and cognitively more complex) had higher grit levels, with large effect sizes for the identified relationships. There were no differences in the relations for either group. The associations between thinking styles and grit may protect against psychological pressure and rehabilitation problems and enable university/school administrators, counselors, social workers, teachers, parents, and students to enhance the grit of students who are deaf or hard of hearing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The American Annals of the Deaf is a professional journal dedicated to quality in education and related services for deaf or hard of hearing children and adults. First published in 1847, the Annals is the oldest and most widely read English-language journal dealing with deafness and the education of deaf persons. The Annals is the official organ of the Council of American Instructors of the Deaf (CAID) and of the Conference of Educational Administrators of Schools and Programs for the Deaf (CEASD) and is directed and administered by a Joint Annals Administrative Committee made up of members of the executive committees of both of these organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信