{"title":"女性小细胞肺癌患者的生存率要高于病情广泛但不局限的男性患者。","authors":"Faruk Tas, Akin Ozturk, Kayhan Erturk","doi":"10.1159/000540244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several previous studies have explored whether sex has prognostic significance in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this retrospective study, we aimed to show the clinical significance of sex in SCLC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 378 SCLC patients were assessed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one (16.1%) patients were women; 26 of 131 (19.9%) patients had limited disease (LD-SCLC); and 14.2% of patients (35 of 247 patients) had extended disease (ED-SCLC). In all SCLC patients, regardless of stage, female patients were more likely to be nonsmokers (7.7 vs. 1%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 11.4 vs. 1.4%, p = 0.001 for ED-SCLC) and more often to be anemic (26.9 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 45.7 vs. 28%, p = 0.03 for ED-SCLC). While women with LD-SCLC were diagnosed younger (<60) than men (65.4 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.009), they had larger (>5 cm) tumors (69.2 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.01). Moreover, obesity (77.1 vs. 56.4%, p = 0.02) and less weight loss (88.6 vs. 73.6%, p = 0.04) were more common in women with ED-SCLC than in men. However, there were no associations between sex and significant prognostic factors, such as performance status, metastasis site, serum LDH level, response to chemotherapy, and disease recurrence. Outcomes in LD-SCLC patients were found to be similar between sexes; median overall survivals in women compared to men was 18 versus 15 months, respectively (p = 0.8). On the other hand, female patients with ED-SCLC had better survivals; median survivals for women versus men were 10 versus 7 months, respectively (p = 0.008). This significance for female ED-SCLC patients was also maintained in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the survival rates of female patients, who constitute a small proportion of SCLC patients, are no different from men in LD-SCLC, they are better in ED-SCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"401-409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer Have Better Survival than Males with Extensive but Not Limited Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Faruk Tas, Akin Ozturk, Kayhan Erturk\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several previous studies have explored whether sex has prognostic significance in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this retrospective study, we aimed to show the clinical significance of sex in SCLC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 378 SCLC patients were assessed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one (16.1%) patients were women; 26 of 131 (19.9%) patients had limited disease (LD-SCLC); and 14.2% of patients (35 of 247 patients) had extended disease (ED-SCLC). In all SCLC patients, regardless of stage, female patients were more likely to be nonsmokers (7.7 vs. 1%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 11.4 vs. 1.4%, p = 0.001 for ED-SCLC) and more often to be anemic (26.9 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 45.7 vs. 28%, p = 0.03 for ED-SCLC). While women with LD-SCLC were diagnosed younger (<60) than men (65.4 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.009), they had larger (>5 cm) tumors (69.2 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.01). Moreover, obesity (77.1 vs. 56.4%, p = 0.02) and less weight loss (88.6 vs. 73.6%, p = 0.04) were more common in women with ED-SCLC than in men. However, there were no associations between sex and significant prognostic factors, such as performance status, metastasis site, serum LDH level, response to chemotherapy, and disease recurrence. Outcomes in LD-SCLC patients were found to be similar between sexes; median overall survivals in women compared to men was 18 versus 15 months, respectively (p = 0.8). On the other hand, female patients with ED-SCLC had better survivals; median survivals for women versus men were 10 versus 7 months, respectively (p = 0.008). This significance for female ED-SCLC patients was also maintained in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the survival rates of female patients, who constitute a small proportion of SCLC patients, are no different from men in LD-SCLC, they are better in ED-SCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"401-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Female Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer Have Better Survival than Males with Extensive but Not Limited Disease.
Introduction: Several previous studies have explored whether sex has prognostic significance in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In this retrospective study, we aimed to show the clinical significance of sex in SCLC patients.
Methods: A total of 378 SCLC patients were assessed retrospectively.
Results: Sixty-one (16.1%) patients were women; 26 of 131 (19.9%) patients had limited disease (LD-SCLC); and 14.2% of patients (35 of 247 patients) had extended disease (ED-SCLC). In all SCLC patients, regardless of stage, female patients were more likely to be nonsmokers (7.7 vs. 1%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 11.4 vs. 1.4%, p = 0.001 for ED-SCLC) and more often to be anemic (26.9 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04 for LD-SCLC; and 45.7 vs. 28%, p = 0.03 for ED-SCLC). While women with LD-SCLC were diagnosed younger (<60) than men (65.4 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.009), they had larger (>5 cm) tumors (69.2 vs. 42.9%, p = 0.01). Moreover, obesity (77.1 vs. 56.4%, p = 0.02) and less weight loss (88.6 vs. 73.6%, p = 0.04) were more common in women with ED-SCLC than in men. However, there were no associations between sex and significant prognostic factors, such as performance status, metastasis site, serum LDH level, response to chemotherapy, and disease recurrence. Outcomes in LD-SCLC patients were found to be similar between sexes; median overall survivals in women compared to men was 18 versus 15 months, respectively (p = 0.8). On the other hand, female patients with ED-SCLC had better survivals; median survivals for women versus men were 10 versus 7 months, respectively (p = 0.008). This significance for female ED-SCLC patients was also maintained in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.001).
Conclusion: While the survival rates of female patients, who constitute a small proportion of SCLC patients, are no different from men in LD-SCLC, they are better in ED-SCLC.
期刊介绍:
With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.