气体感应胶囊与无线运动胶囊在运动障碍患者中的应用比较

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jerry Zhou, Phoebe A Thwaites, Peter R Gibson, Rebecca Burgell, Vincent Ho
{"title":"气体感应胶囊与无线运动胶囊在运动障碍患者中的应用比较","authors":"Jerry Zhou, Phoebe A Thwaites, Peter R Gibson, Rebecca Burgell, Vincent Ho","doi":"10.5056/jnm23157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Motility disorders are prevalent, often leading to disrupted regional or whole gut transit times. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis between the wireless motility capsule and an innovative gas-sensing capsule to evaluate regional and whole gut transit times in individuals with diagnosed motility disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 48 patients (34 women) diagnosed with functional dyspepsia and/or functional constipation according to Rome IV criteria. Patients ingested the capsules in tandem. We assessed the agreement between transit times recorded by both devices using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Additionally, diagnostic concordance between the capsules were evaluated using confusion matrices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a significant correlation between the wireless motility capsule and the gas-sensing capsule for gastric emptying time (<i>r</i> = 0.79, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and colonic transit time (<i>r</i> = 0.66, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The gas-sensing capsule exhibited a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.96, and accuracy of 0.94 when using the standard cutoff for delayed gastric emptying (5 hours). Similarly, when applying the cutoff value for delayed colonic transit (> 59 hours), the gas-sensing capsule demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.79, specificity of 0.84, and accuracy of 0.82. Importantly, the gas-sensing capsule was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported during the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the gas-sensing capsule's suitability as a dependable tool for assessing regional and whole gut transit times. It represents a promising alternative to the wireless motility capsule for evaluating patients with suspected motility disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Gas-sensing Capsule With Wireless Motility Capsule in Motility Disorder Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jerry Zhou, Phoebe A Thwaites, Peter R Gibson, Rebecca Burgell, Vincent Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.5056/jnm23157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Motility disorders are prevalent, often leading to disrupted regional or whole gut transit times. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis between the wireless motility capsule and an innovative gas-sensing capsule to evaluate regional and whole gut transit times in individuals with diagnosed motility disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 48 patients (34 women) diagnosed with functional dyspepsia and/or functional constipation according to Rome IV criteria. Patients ingested the capsules in tandem. We assessed the agreement between transit times recorded by both devices using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Additionally, diagnostic concordance between the capsules were evaluated using confusion matrices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a significant correlation between the wireless motility capsule and the gas-sensing capsule for gastric emptying time (<i>r</i> = 0.79, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and colonic transit time (<i>r</i> = 0.66, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The gas-sensing capsule exhibited a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.96, and accuracy of 0.94 when using the standard cutoff for delayed gastric emptying (5 hours). Similarly, when applying the cutoff value for delayed colonic transit (> 59 hours), the gas-sensing capsule demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.79, specificity of 0.84, and accuracy of 0.82. Importantly, the gas-sensing capsule was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported during the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the gas-sensing capsule's suitability as a dependable tool for assessing regional and whole gut transit times. It represents a promising alternative to the wireless motility capsule for evaluating patients with suspected motility disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm23157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm23157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:肠道运动失调是一种普遍现象,通常会导致区域或整个肠道转运时间紊乱。在这项研究中,我们对无线蠕动胶囊和创新型气体感应胶囊进行了比较分析,以评估已确诊蠕动障碍患者的区域和整个肠道转运时间:我们前瞻性地招募了48名根据罗马IV标准诊断为功能性消化不良和/或功能性便秘的患者(34名女性)。患者同时服用胶囊。我们使用斯皮尔曼相关分析和布兰德-阿尔特曼分析评估了两种设备记录的转运时间之间的一致性。此外,我们还使用混淆矩阵评估了两种胶囊的诊断一致性:我们观察到无线运动胶囊和气体感应胶囊在胃排空时间(r = 0.79,P < 0.001)和结肠转运时间(r = 0.66,P < 0.001)方面存在明显的相关性。当使用胃排空延迟的标准临界值(5 小时)时,气敏胶囊的灵敏度为 0.83,特异度为 0.96,准确度为 0.94。同样,当采用延迟结肠排空的临界值(> 59 小时)时,气体感应胶囊的灵敏度为 0.79,特异度为 0.84,准确度为 0.82。重要的是,气体感应胶囊的耐受性良好,在研究期间没有出现严重的不良反应:我们的研究结果表明,气体感应胶囊是评估区域和整个肠道转运时间的可靠工具。结论:我们的研究结果强调了气体感应胶囊作为评估区域和整个肠道转运时间的可靠工具的适用性,它是评估疑似肠道运动障碍患者的无线运动胶囊的一种很有前途的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Gas-sensing Capsule With Wireless Motility Capsule in Motility Disorder Patients.

Background/aims: Motility disorders are prevalent, often leading to disrupted regional or whole gut transit times. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis between the wireless motility capsule and an innovative gas-sensing capsule to evaluate regional and whole gut transit times in individuals with diagnosed motility disorders.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 48 patients (34 women) diagnosed with functional dyspepsia and/or functional constipation according to Rome IV criteria. Patients ingested the capsules in tandem. We assessed the agreement between transit times recorded by both devices using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Additionally, diagnostic concordance between the capsules were evaluated using confusion matrices.

Results: We observed a significant correlation between the wireless motility capsule and the gas-sensing capsule for gastric emptying time (r = 0.79, P < 0.001) and colonic transit time (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). The gas-sensing capsule exhibited a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.96, and accuracy of 0.94 when using the standard cutoff for delayed gastric emptying (5 hours). Similarly, when applying the cutoff value for delayed colonic transit (> 59 hours), the gas-sensing capsule demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.79, specificity of 0.84, and accuracy of 0.82. Importantly, the gas-sensing capsule was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported during the study.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the gas-sensing capsule's suitability as a dependable tool for assessing regional and whole gut transit times. It represents a promising alternative to the wireless motility capsule for evaluating patients with suspected motility disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (J Neurogastroenterol Motil) is a joint official journal of the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Thai Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society, the Japanese Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Indian Motility and Functional Disease Association, the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Motility, the South East Asia Gastro-Neuro Motility Association, the Taiwan Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association, launched in January 2010 after the title change from the Korean Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, published from 1994 to 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信