种植 Bt 玉米和棉花可降低黄曲霉毒素风险,从而使花生种植者受益。

IF 10.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Jina Yu, David A. Hennessy, Felicia Wu
{"title":"种植 Bt 玉米和棉花可降低黄曲霉毒素风险,从而使花生种植者受益。","authors":"Jina Yu,&nbsp;David A. Hennessy,&nbsp;Felicia Wu","doi":"10.1111/pbi.14425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Decades of studies have shown that Bt corn, by reducing insect damage, has lower levels of mycotoxins (fungal toxins), such as aflatoxin and fumonisin, than conventional corn. We used crop insurance data to infer that this benefit from Bt crops extends to reducing aflatoxin risk in peanuts: a non-Bt crop. In consequence, we suggest that any benefit–cost assessment of how transgenic Bt crops affect food safety should not be limited to assessing those crops alone; because the insect pest control offered by Bt crops affects the food safety profile of other crops grown nearby. Specifically, we found that higher Bt corn and Bt cotton planting rates in peanut-growing areas of the United States were associated with lower aflatoxin risk in peanuts as measured by aflatoxin-related insurance claims filed by peanut growers. Drought-related insurance claims were also lower: possibly due to Bt crops' suppression of insects that would otherwise feed on roots, rendering peanut plants more vulnerable to drought. These findings have implications for countries worldwide where policies allow Bt cotton but not Bt food crops to be grown: simply planting a Bt crop may reduce aflatoxin and drought stress in nearby food crops, resulting in a safer food supply through an inter-crop “halo effect.”</p>","PeriodicalId":221,"journal":{"name":"Plant Biotechnology Journal","volume":"22 11","pages":"3028-3036"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pbi.14425","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bt corn and cotton planting may benefit peanut growers by reducing aflatoxin risk\",\"authors\":\"Jina Yu,&nbsp;David A. Hennessy,&nbsp;Felicia Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pbi.14425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Decades of studies have shown that Bt corn, by reducing insect damage, has lower levels of mycotoxins (fungal toxins), such as aflatoxin and fumonisin, than conventional corn. We used crop insurance data to infer that this benefit from Bt crops extends to reducing aflatoxin risk in peanuts: a non-Bt crop. In consequence, we suggest that any benefit–cost assessment of how transgenic Bt crops affect food safety should not be limited to assessing those crops alone; because the insect pest control offered by Bt crops affects the food safety profile of other crops grown nearby. Specifically, we found that higher Bt corn and Bt cotton planting rates in peanut-growing areas of the United States were associated with lower aflatoxin risk in peanuts as measured by aflatoxin-related insurance claims filed by peanut growers. Drought-related insurance claims were also lower: possibly due to Bt crops' suppression of insects that would otherwise feed on roots, rendering peanut plants more vulnerable to drought. These findings have implications for countries worldwide where policies allow Bt cotton but not Bt food crops to be grown: simply planting a Bt crop may reduce aflatoxin and drought stress in nearby food crops, resulting in a safer food supply through an inter-crop “halo effect.”</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Biotechnology Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 11\",\"pages\":\"3028-3036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pbi.14425\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Biotechnology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pbi.14425\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Biotechnology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pbi.14425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年的研究表明,Bt 玉米通过减少昆虫危害,其霉菌毒素(真菌毒素)(如黄曲霉毒素和伏马菌素)的含量低于传统玉米。我们利用农作物保险数据推断,Bt 作物的这一益处还能降低花生(一种非 Bt 作物)中黄曲霉毒素的风险。因此,我们建议,对转基因 Bt 作物如何影响食品安全进行效益成本评估时,不应仅限于评估这些作物;因为 Bt 作物提供的害虫控制会影响附近种植的其他作物的食品安全状况。具体而言,我们发现,在美国花生种植区,Bt 玉米和 Bt 棉花的种植率越高,花生中黄曲霉毒素的风险就越低。与干旱相关的保险索赔也较低:这可能是由于 Bt 作物抑制了本来会以根部为食的昆虫,使花生植株更容易受到干旱的影响。这些发现对世界上那些政策允许种植 Bt 棉花而不允许种植 Bt 粮食作物的国家具有启示意义:只需种植一种 Bt 作物,就可能减少附近粮食作物的黄曲霉毒素和干旱压力,从而通过作物间的 "晕轮效应 "实现更安全的粮食供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bt corn and cotton planting may benefit peanut growers by reducing aflatoxin risk

Bt corn and cotton planting may benefit peanut growers by reducing aflatoxin risk

Decades of studies have shown that Bt corn, by reducing insect damage, has lower levels of mycotoxins (fungal toxins), such as aflatoxin and fumonisin, than conventional corn. We used crop insurance data to infer that this benefit from Bt crops extends to reducing aflatoxin risk in peanuts: a non-Bt crop. In consequence, we suggest that any benefit–cost assessment of how transgenic Bt crops affect food safety should not be limited to assessing those crops alone; because the insect pest control offered by Bt crops affects the food safety profile of other crops grown nearby. Specifically, we found that higher Bt corn and Bt cotton planting rates in peanut-growing areas of the United States were associated with lower aflatoxin risk in peanuts as measured by aflatoxin-related insurance claims filed by peanut growers. Drought-related insurance claims were also lower: possibly due to Bt crops' suppression of insects that would otherwise feed on roots, rendering peanut plants more vulnerable to drought. These findings have implications for countries worldwide where policies allow Bt cotton but not Bt food crops to be grown: simply planting a Bt crop may reduce aflatoxin and drought stress in nearby food crops, resulting in a safer food supply through an inter-crop “halo effect.”

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Plant Biotechnology Journal 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Plant Biotechnology Journal aspires to publish original research and insightful reviews of high impact, authored by prominent researchers in applied plant science. The journal places a special emphasis on molecular plant sciences and their practical applications through plant biotechnology. Our goal is to establish a platform for showcasing significant advances in the field, encompassing curiosity-driven studies with potential applications, strategic research in plant biotechnology, scientific analysis of crucial issues for the beneficial utilization of plant sciences, and assessments of the performance of plant biotechnology products in practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信