问题暴露与问题解决:监管制度对公民信任受监管部门的影响

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Yue Guo, Tianhao Zhai, Hao Huang, Luozhong Wang
{"title":"问题暴露与问题解决:监管制度对公民信任受监管部门的影响","authors":"Yue Guo, Tianhao Zhai, Hao Huang, Luozhong Wang","doi":"10.1111/rego.12610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A wealth of studies has discussed the impact of different regulatory regimes on firms, but have ignored the differences in citizens' attitudes toward firms in different regulatory regimes. Exploring these attitudes is crucial to understanding the micro‐effects of regulatory regimes and market developments. This study aims to investigates the impact of regulatory regimes on citizens' trust in regulated sectors and uncovers the underlying impact mechanisms. Using a survey experiment within the context of algorithm regulation (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 1224), we reveal that the coerciveness of regulatory regimes positively influences citizens' trust in regulated firms. Furthermore, we identify problem‐solving and problem exposure perceptions as key mediators in this relationship. The findings contribute to the ongoing debate between regulation and trust, shedding light on their interplay in contemporary society and providing practical implications for policymakers and businesses navigating complex regulatory landscapes.","PeriodicalId":21026,"journal":{"name":"Regulation & Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problem exposure and problem solving: The impact of regulatory regimes on citizens' trust in regulated sectors\",\"authors\":\"Yue Guo, Tianhao Zhai, Hao Huang, Luozhong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rego.12610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A wealth of studies has discussed the impact of different regulatory regimes on firms, but have ignored the differences in citizens' attitudes toward firms in different regulatory regimes. Exploring these attitudes is crucial to understanding the micro‐effects of regulatory regimes and market developments. This study aims to investigates the impact of regulatory regimes on citizens' trust in regulated sectors and uncovers the underlying impact mechanisms. Using a survey experiment within the context of algorithm regulation (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 1224), we reveal that the coerciveness of regulatory regimes positively influences citizens' trust in regulated firms. Furthermore, we identify problem‐solving and problem exposure perceptions as key mediators in this relationship. The findings contribute to the ongoing debate between regulation and trust, shedding light on their interplay in contemporary society and providing practical implications for policymakers and businesses navigating complex regulatory landscapes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulation & Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulation & Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12610\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量研究讨论了不同监管制度对企业的影响,但却忽视了公民对不同监管制度下企业态度的差异。探讨这些态度对于理解监管制度和市场发展的微观影响至关重要。本研究旨在探讨监管制度对公民对受监管行业信任度的影响,并揭示其背后的影响机制。通过在算法监管背景下的调查实验(N = 1224),我们发现监管制度的强制性会积极影响公民对受监管企业的信任。此外,我们还发现问题解决和问题暴露感知是这一关系的关键中介。这些研究结果为当前监管与信任之间的争论做出了贡献,揭示了它们在当代社会中的相互作用,并为政策制定者和企业在复杂的监管环境中航行提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problem exposure and problem solving: The impact of regulatory regimes on citizens' trust in regulated sectors
A wealth of studies has discussed the impact of different regulatory regimes on firms, but have ignored the differences in citizens' attitudes toward firms in different regulatory regimes. Exploring these attitudes is crucial to understanding the micro‐effects of regulatory regimes and market developments. This study aims to investigates the impact of regulatory regimes on citizens' trust in regulated sectors and uncovers the underlying impact mechanisms. Using a survey experiment within the context of algorithm regulation (N = 1224), we reveal that the coerciveness of regulatory regimes positively influences citizens' trust in regulated firms. Furthermore, we identify problem‐solving and problem exposure perceptions as key mediators in this relationship. The findings contribute to the ongoing debate between regulation and trust, shedding light on their interplay in contemporary society and providing practical implications for policymakers and businesses navigating complex regulatory landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Regulation & Governance serves as the leading platform for the study of regulation and governance by political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, historians, criminologists, psychologists, anthropologists, economists and others. Research on regulation and governance, once fragmented across various disciplines and subject areas, has emerged at the cutting edge of paradigmatic change in the social sciences. Through the peer-reviewed journal Regulation & Governance, we seek to advance discussions between various disciplines about regulation and governance, promote the development of new theoretical and empirical understanding, and serve the growing needs of practitioners for a useful academic reference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信