战略议程建设如何影响供应资源评估和采购政策?食品行业案例

Karina Hjørringgaard, Poul Houman Houman Andersen
{"title":"战略议程建设如何影响供应资源评估和采购政策?食品行业案例","authors":"Karina Hjørringgaard, Poul Houman Houman Andersen","doi":"10.1108/scm-05-2023-0271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Business strategy issues increasingly concern value realized from supply resources. However, how supply resources are valorized by managerial factions in a strategic issue setting is not sufficiently explored. In organizations operating in complex business contexts, several strategic agendas and supply value perceptions typically coexist. This study aims to explore the process of developing corporate attention towards supply-related strategic issues and how it links to sourcing strategy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>An explorative longitudinal case study within the food industry is conducted. Data are collected in a four year period. Working physically from the case company made it possible to be close to the company’s actors. The first author participated in 26 formal team meetings ranging from 1.5 h to 3 days long, conducted 28 interviews across managerial levels and functions and participated in informal verbal and written communications.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study explores strategizing efforts of organizations and scrutinize consequences of strategic ambiguity for sourcing strategy and supply resources. Furthermore, this study outlines implications for management and theory development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Since this paper is based on an in-depth single case study, its findings are not empirically generalizable.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This paper suggests that managers should pay stronger attention to constituents’ valuation of supply resources, and how they fit with the different strategic agendas within the firm. By doing so, a more comprehensive supply resource mobilization is possible.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Business strategy research increasingly focuses on the value of supply resources for a buying firm’s business strategy (Kotabe and Murray 2018; Lee and Rammohan 2017; Schiele, Calvi, and Gibbert 2012). In a context where the value obtained from sourcing is gaining increased importance, more organizations link supply policies with corporate strategic goals (Andersen, Ellegaard, and Kragh 2016; Hesping and Schiele 2015; Pardo <em>et al.</em>, 2011). However, existing supply chain research does not incorporate an organization’s strategizing efforts, when considering supply resource valuation, and how this can be a source of ambiguity to sourcing strategy. The is the paper’s contribution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":30468,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does strategic agenda building affect valuation of supply resources and sourcing policies? A case from the food industry\",\"authors\":\"Karina Hjørringgaard, Poul Houman Houman Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/scm-05-2023-0271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Business strategy issues increasingly concern value realized from supply resources. However, how supply resources are valorized by managerial factions in a strategic issue setting is not sufficiently explored. In organizations operating in complex business contexts, several strategic agendas and supply value perceptions typically coexist. This study aims to explore the process of developing corporate attention towards supply-related strategic issues and how it links to sourcing strategy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>An explorative longitudinal case study within the food industry is conducted. Data are collected in a four year period. Working physically from the case company made it possible to be close to the company’s actors. The first author participated in 26 formal team meetings ranging from 1.5 h to 3 days long, conducted 28 interviews across managerial levels and functions and participated in informal verbal and written communications.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>This study explores strategizing efforts of organizations and scrutinize consequences of strategic ambiguity for sourcing strategy and supply resources. Furthermore, this study outlines implications for management and theory development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>Since this paper is based on an in-depth single case study, its findings are not empirically generalizable.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This paper suggests that managers should pay stronger attention to constituents’ valuation of supply resources, and how they fit with the different strategic agendas within the firm. By doing so, a more comprehensive supply resource mobilization is possible.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Business strategy research increasingly focuses on the value of supply resources for a buying firm’s business strategy (Kotabe and Murray 2018; Lee and Rammohan 2017; Schiele, Calvi, and Gibbert 2012). In a context where the value obtained from sourcing is gaining increased importance, more organizations link supply policies with corporate strategic goals (Andersen, Ellegaard, and Kragh 2016; Hesping and Schiele 2015; Pardo <em>et al.</em>, 2011). However, existing supply chain research does not incorporate an organization’s strategizing efforts, when considering supply resource valuation, and how this can be a source of ambiguity to sourcing strategy. The is the paper’s contribution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":30468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supply Chain Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supply Chain Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-05-2023-0271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-05-2023-0271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 企业战略问题越来越多地涉及从供应资源中实现价值的问题。然而,在战略问题的背景下,管理派别如何评价供应资源的价值却没有得到充分的探讨。在复杂商业环境下运营的组织中,通常会同时存在多个战略议程和供应价值认知。本研究旨在探讨企业对供应相关战略问题的关注度的发展过程,以及它与采购战略之间的联系。数据收集期为四年。由于是在案例公司工作,因此有可能接近公司的参与者。第一作者参加了 26 次长达 1.5 小时至 3 天的正式团队会议,进行了 28 次跨管理级别和职能部门的访谈,并参与了非正式的口头和书面交流。 研究结果本研究探讨了组织的战略制定工作,并仔细研究了战略模糊性对采购战略和供应资源的影响。此外,本研究还概述了对管理和理论发展的启示。研究局限/影响由于本文是基于一项深入的单一案例研究,因此其结论不具有经验普遍性。通过这样做,可以更全面地调动供应资源。原创性/价值商业战略研究越来越关注供应资源对购买公司商业战略的价值(Kotabe 和 Murray,2018 年;Lee 和 Rammohan,2017 年;Schiele、Calvi 和 Gibbert,2012 年)。在采购获得的价值越来越重要的背景下,越来越多的组织将供应政策与企业战略目标联系起来(Andersen、Ellegaard 和 Kragh,2016 年;Hesping 和 Schiele,2015 年;Pardo 等人,2011 年)。然而,现有的供应链研究在考虑供应资源估值时,并没有将组织的战略努力纳入其中,也没有考虑这如何成为采购战略模糊性的来源。这就是本文的贡献所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does strategic agenda building affect valuation of supply resources and sourcing policies? A case from the food industry

Purpose

Business strategy issues increasingly concern value realized from supply resources. However, how supply resources are valorized by managerial factions in a strategic issue setting is not sufficiently explored. In organizations operating in complex business contexts, several strategic agendas and supply value perceptions typically coexist. This study aims to explore the process of developing corporate attention towards supply-related strategic issues and how it links to sourcing strategy.

Design/methodology/approach

An explorative longitudinal case study within the food industry is conducted. Data are collected in a four year period. Working physically from the case company made it possible to be close to the company’s actors. The first author participated in 26 formal team meetings ranging from 1.5 h to 3 days long, conducted 28 interviews across managerial levels and functions and participated in informal verbal and written communications.

Findings

This study explores strategizing efforts of organizations and scrutinize consequences of strategic ambiguity for sourcing strategy and supply resources. Furthermore, this study outlines implications for management and theory development.

Research limitations/implications

Since this paper is based on an in-depth single case study, its findings are not empirically generalizable.

Practical implications

This paper suggests that managers should pay stronger attention to constituents’ valuation of supply resources, and how they fit with the different strategic agendas within the firm. By doing so, a more comprehensive supply resource mobilization is possible.

Originality/value

Business strategy research increasingly focuses on the value of supply resources for a buying firm’s business strategy (Kotabe and Murray 2018; Lee and Rammohan 2017; Schiele, Calvi, and Gibbert 2012). In a context where the value obtained from sourcing is gaining increased importance, more organizations link supply policies with corporate strategic goals (Andersen, Ellegaard, and Kragh 2016; Hesping and Schiele 2015; Pardo et al., 2011). However, existing supply chain research does not incorporate an organization’s strategizing efforts, when considering supply resource valuation, and how this can be a source of ambiguity to sourcing strategy. The is the paper’s contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信