利用机器学习对无人驾驶航空系统图像进行农场黑麦生物量估算

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kushal KC, Matthew Romanko, Andrew Perrault, Sami Khanal
{"title":"利用机器学习对无人驾驶航空系统图像进行农场黑麦生物量估算","authors":"Kushal KC, Matthew Romanko, Andrew Perrault, Sami Khanal","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10162-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assesses the potential of using multispectral images collected by an unmanned aerial system (UAS) on machine learning (ML) frameworks to estimate cereal rye (<i>Secale cereal</i> L.) biomass. Multispectral images and ground-truth cereal rye biomass data were collected from 15 farmers’ fields up to three times between March and May in northwest Ohio. Images were processed to derive 13 vegetation indices (VIs). Out of 13 VIs, six optimal sets of VIs, including excess green (ExG), normalized green red difference index (NGRDI), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), blue green ratio (B_G_ratio), red-edge triangular vegetation index (RTVI), and normalized difference red-edge (NDRE) were selected using the variance inflation factor (VIF) based feature selection approach. Six regression models including a multiple linear regression (MLR), elastic net (ENET), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) were investigated for estimation of cereal rye biomass based on the VIs. For most of the models, the six selected VIs performed better than or similar to the full set of 13 VIs with R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.24 to 0.59 and RMSE ranging from 83.13 to 91.89 g/m<sup>2</sup> during 10-fold cross-validation. During independent accuracy assessment with the selected set of VIs, XGB exhibited the highest R<sup>2</sup> (0.67) and lowest RMSE (83.13 g/m<sup>2</sup>) and MAE (48.13 g/m<sup>2</sup>) followed by RF and ENET. For all the models, the agreement between observed and predicted biomass was high for biomass less than or equal to 200 g/m<sup>2</sup> but decreased for biomass greater than 200 g/m<sup>2</sup>. When field-collected structural features were integrated with the selected VIs, the models showed improved performance, with R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of the models reaching up to 0.82 and 61.67 g/m<sup>2</sup> respectively. Among the six VIs, SAVI showed the strongest impact on the model prediction for the best-performing RF and XGB regression models. The findings of this study demonstrate the potential of precisely estimating and mapping cereal rye biomass based on UAS-captured multispectral images. Timely information on cover crop growth can facilitate numerous decision-making processes, including planning the planting operations, and management of nutrients, weeds, and soil moisture to improve agronomic and environmental outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-farm cereal rye biomass estimation using machine learning on images from an unmanned aerial system\",\"authors\":\"Kushal KC, Matthew Romanko, Andrew Perrault, Sami Khanal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11119-024-10162-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study assesses the potential of using multispectral images collected by an unmanned aerial system (UAS) on machine learning (ML) frameworks to estimate cereal rye (<i>Secale cereal</i> L.) biomass. Multispectral images and ground-truth cereal rye biomass data were collected from 15 farmers’ fields up to three times between March and May in northwest Ohio. Images were processed to derive 13 vegetation indices (VIs). Out of 13 VIs, six optimal sets of VIs, including excess green (ExG), normalized green red difference index (NGRDI), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), blue green ratio (B_G_ratio), red-edge triangular vegetation index (RTVI), and normalized difference red-edge (NDRE) were selected using the variance inflation factor (VIF) based feature selection approach. Six regression models including a multiple linear regression (MLR), elastic net (ENET), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) were investigated for estimation of cereal rye biomass based on the VIs. For most of the models, the six selected VIs performed better than or similar to the full set of 13 VIs with R<sup>2</sup> ranging from 0.24 to 0.59 and RMSE ranging from 83.13 to 91.89 g/m<sup>2</sup> during 10-fold cross-validation. During independent accuracy assessment with the selected set of VIs, XGB exhibited the highest R<sup>2</sup> (0.67) and lowest RMSE (83.13 g/m<sup>2</sup>) and MAE (48.13 g/m<sup>2</sup>) followed by RF and ENET. For all the models, the agreement between observed and predicted biomass was high for biomass less than or equal to 200 g/m<sup>2</sup> but decreased for biomass greater than 200 g/m<sup>2</sup>. When field-collected structural features were integrated with the selected VIs, the models showed improved performance, with R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE of the models reaching up to 0.82 and 61.67 g/m<sup>2</sup> respectively. Among the six VIs, SAVI showed the strongest impact on the model prediction for the best-performing RF and XGB regression models. The findings of this study demonstrate the potential of precisely estimating and mapping cereal rye biomass based on UAS-captured multispectral images. Timely information on cover crop growth can facilitate numerous decision-making processes, including planning the planting operations, and management of nutrients, weeds, and soil moisture to improve agronomic and environmental outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10162-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10162-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了在机器学习(ML)框架上使用无人机系统(UAS)采集的多光谱图像估算黑麦(Secale cereal L.)生物量的潜力。在俄亥俄州西北部,从 3 月到 5 月,从 15 个农户的田地里收集了多达三次的多光谱图像和地面实况黑麦生物量数据。图像经过处理后得出了 13 种植被指数(VIs)。利用基于方差膨胀因子(VIF)的特征选择方法,从 13 个植被指数中选出了 6 组最佳植被指数,包括过量绿色植被指数(ExG)、归一化绿色红差指数(NGRDI)、土壤调整植被指数(SAVI)、蓝绿比(B_G_ratio)、红边三角形植被指数(RTVI)和归一化红边差异植被指数(NDRE)。研究了六种回归模型,包括多元线性回归模型(MLR)、弹性网模型(ENET)、多元自适应回归样条模型(MARS)、支持向量机模型(SVM)、随机森林模型(RF)和极梯度提升模型(XGB),以根据植被指数估算黑麦的生物量。在大多数模型中,所选的 6 个 VI 的表现优于或类似于全套 13 个 VI,在 10 倍交叉验证中,R2 为 0.24 至 0.59,RMSE 为 83.13 至 91.89 g/m2。在使用选定的一组 VI 进行独立精度评估时,XGB 的 R2(0.67)最高,RMSE(83.13 g/m2)和 MAE(48.13 g/m2)最低,其次是 RF 和 ENET。在所有模型中,当生物量小于或等于 200 g/m2 时,观测生物量与预测生物量之间的一致性较高,但当生物量大于 200 g/m2 时,两者之间的一致性降低。将实地采集的结构特征与所选的 VIs 结合后,模型的性能有所提高,模型的 R2 和 RMSE 分别达到 0.82 和 61.67 g/m2。在六种 VI 中,SAVI 对表现最佳的 RF 和 XGB 回归模型的预测影响最大。这项研究的结果证明了基于无人机系统捕获的多光谱图像精确估算和绘制黑麦生物量图的潜力。有关覆盖作物生长情况的及时信息可促进许多决策过程,包括规划种植作业以及管理养分、杂草和土壤水分,从而改善农艺和环境效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

On-farm cereal rye biomass estimation using machine learning on images from an unmanned aerial system

On-farm cereal rye biomass estimation using machine learning on images from an unmanned aerial system

This study assesses the potential of using multispectral images collected by an unmanned aerial system (UAS) on machine learning (ML) frameworks to estimate cereal rye (Secale cereal L.) biomass. Multispectral images and ground-truth cereal rye biomass data were collected from 15 farmers’ fields up to three times between March and May in northwest Ohio. Images were processed to derive 13 vegetation indices (VIs). Out of 13 VIs, six optimal sets of VIs, including excess green (ExG), normalized green red difference index (NGRDI), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), blue green ratio (B_G_ratio), red-edge triangular vegetation index (RTVI), and normalized difference red-edge (NDRE) were selected using the variance inflation factor (VIF) based feature selection approach. Six regression models including a multiple linear regression (MLR), elastic net (ENET), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) were investigated for estimation of cereal rye biomass based on the VIs. For most of the models, the six selected VIs performed better than or similar to the full set of 13 VIs with R2 ranging from 0.24 to 0.59 and RMSE ranging from 83.13 to 91.89 g/m2 during 10-fold cross-validation. During independent accuracy assessment with the selected set of VIs, XGB exhibited the highest R2 (0.67) and lowest RMSE (83.13 g/m2) and MAE (48.13 g/m2) followed by RF and ENET. For all the models, the agreement between observed and predicted biomass was high for biomass less than or equal to 200 g/m2 but decreased for biomass greater than 200 g/m2. When field-collected structural features were integrated with the selected VIs, the models showed improved performance, with R2 and RMSE of the models reaching up to 0.82 and 61.67 g/m2 respectively. Among the six VIs, SAVI showed the strongest impact on the model prediction for the best-performing RF and XGB regression models. The findings of this study demonstrate the potential of precisely estimating and mapping cereal rye biomass based on UAS-captured multispectral images. Timely information on cover crop growth can facilitate numerous decision-making processes, including planning the planting operations, and management of nutrients, weeds, and soil moisture to improve agronomic and environmental outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信