Neolissochilus的系统发育和鲤科属间亲缘地理研究

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Chenyao Zhou, Jinghong He, Honghao Huang, Handong Wang, Zhangjie Chu, Bo Zhao, Shuirong Guo
{"title":"Neolissochilus的系统发育和鲤科属间亲缘地理研究","authors":"Chenyao Zhou, Jinghong He, Honghao Huang, Handong Wang, Zhangjie Chu, Bo Zhao, Shuirong Guo","doi":"10.1007/s10750-024-05628-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate species delimitation and phylogenetic reconstruction are vital to understand biodiversity assessments, conservation management, evolutionary patterns, evolutionary processes, and historical biogeography. The taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus <i>Neolissochilus</i> (Cyprinidae) have a confusing history. We investigated the taxonomy and phylogeny of this group and related lineages using complete mitochondrial genome sequence data from 53 Cyprinidae species and one outgroup species. These analyses show that the monophyly of <i>Neolissochilus</i> and <i>Tor</i> is not supported. <i>N. benasi</i> might represent a new genus, and <i>T. qiaojiensis</i> should be moved into <i>Neolissochilus</i>. We estimated divergence times, evaluated the monophyly of this group, their relationship to other cyprinids, as well as the time course and geography of speciation. The results indicated that the family Cyprinidae likely diverged from other taxa during the Eocene (ca. 54.78 Mya), and species of various genera began to undergo massive diversification events during the Cenozoic Tertiary. The differentiation and diffusion of the family Cyprinidae might be attributed to the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau uplift events, one of the geological events marking the Cenozoic Tertiary period, which cut off genetic exchange between populations through geographic isolation, thus facilitating genetic divergence between populations and eventually leading to the formation of new species. In addition, the results of this study still need further improvement. The limitations are mainly due to the small sample size and the use of only mitochondrial data; therefore, it still needs to be further verified by combining nuclear genome data.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogeny of Neolissochilus and studies on intergeneric kinship geography of Cyprinidae\",\"authors\":\"Chenyao Zhou, Jinghong He, Honghao Huang, Handong Wang, Zhangjie Chu, Bo Zhao, Shuirong Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10750-024-05628-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate species delimitation and phylogenetic reconstruction are vital to understand biodiversity assessments, conservation management, evolutionary patterns, evolutionary processes, and historical biogeography. The taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus <i>Neolissochilus</i> (Cyprinidae) have a confusing history. We investigated the taxonomy and phylogeny of this group and related lineages using complete mitochondrial genome sequence data from 53 Cyprinidae species and one outgroup species. These analyses show that the monophyly of <i>Neolissochilus</i> and <i>Tor</i> is not supported. <i>N. benasi</i> might represent a new genus, and <i>T. qiaojiensis</i> should be moved into <i>Neolissochilus</i>. We estimated divergence times, evaluated the monophyly of this group, their relationship to other cyprinids, as well as the time course and geography of speciation. The results indicated that the family Cyprinidae likely diverged from other taxa during the Eocene (ca. 54.78 Mya), and species of various genera began to undergo massive diversification events during the Cenozoic Tertiary. The differentiation and diffusion of the family Cyprinidae might be attributed to the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau uplift events, one of the geological events marking the Cenozoic Tertiary period, which cut off genetic exchange between populations through geographic isolation, thus facilitating genetic divergence between populations and eventually leading to the formation of new species. In addition, the results of this study still need further improvement. The limitations are mainly due to the small sample size and the use of only mitochondrial data; therefore, it still needs to be further verified by combining nuclear genome data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05628-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05628-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的物种划分和系统发育重建对于了解生物多样性评估、保护管理、进化模式、进化过程和历史生物地理学至关重要。鲤科(Neolissochilus)属的分类和系统发育历史扑朔迷离。我们利用来自 53 个鲤科物种和 1 个外群物种的完整线粒体基因组序列数据,研究了该类群及相关类群的分类和系统发育。这些分析表明,Neolissochilus 和 Tor 的单系性不被支持。N.benasi可能代表一个新属,而T. qiaojiensis应移入Neolissochilus。我们估算了分化时间,评估了该组的单系性、与其他鲤科鱼类的关系,以及物种分化的时间进程和地理分布。结果表明,鲤科很可能是在始新世(约 54.78 Mya)从其他类群分化而来,各属的物种在新生代第三纪开始大规模分化。鲤科的分化和扩散可能与青藏高原隆升事件有关,青藏高原隆升事件是新生代第三纪的标志性地质事件之一,它通过地理隔离切断了种群之间的遗传交流,从而促进了种群之间的遗传分化,最终导致了新物种的形成。此外,本研究的结果仍需进一步完善。其局限性主要在于样本量较小,且仅使用了线粒体数据,因此仍需结合核基因组数据进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Phylogeny of Neolissochilus and studies on intergeneric kinship geography of Cyprinidae

Phylogeny of Neolissochilus and studies on intergeneric kinship geography of Cyprinidae

Accurate species delimitation and phylogenetic reconstruction are vital to understand biodiversity assessments, conservation management, evolutionary patterns, evolutionary processes, and historical biogeography. The taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Neolissochilus (Cyprinidae) have a confusing history. We investigated the taxonomy and phylogeny of this group and related lineages using complete mitochondrial genome sequence data from 53 Cyprinidae species and one outgroup species. These analyses show that the monophyly of Neolissochilus and Tor is not supported. N. benasi might represent a new genus, and T. qiaojiensis should be moved into Neolissochilus. We estimated divergence times, evaluated the monophyly of this group, their relationship to other cyprinids, as well as the time course and geography of speciation. The results indicated that the family Cyprinidae likely diverged from other taxa during the Eocene (ca. 54.78 Mya), and species of various genera began to undergo massive diversification events during the Cenozoic Tertiary. The differentiation and diffusion of the family Cyprinidae might be attributed to the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau uplift events, one of the geological events marking the Cenozoic Tertiary period, which cut off genetic exchange between populations through geographic isolation, thus facilitating genetic divergence between populations and eventually leading to the formation of new species. In addition, the results of this study still need further improvement. The limitations are mainly due to the small sample size and the use of only mitochondrial data; therefore, it still needs to be further verified by combining nuclear genome data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信