使用根据文献数据训练的机器学习方法,开发用于预测闭式间隙叶轮功率数的新相关性

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Sumit S. Joshi, Vishwanath H. Dalvi, Vivek S. Vitankar, Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi, Aniruddha J. Joshi
{"title":"使用根据文献数据训练的机器学习方法,开发用于预测闭式间隙叶轮功率数的新相关性","authors":"Sumit S. Joshi,&nbsp;Vishwanath H. Dalvi,&nbsp;Vivek S. Vitankar,&nbsp;Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,&nbsp;Aniruddha J. Joshi","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The accurate estimation of the power number for closed clearance impellers holds significant importance in industries such as chemical, biochemical, paper and pulp, as well as paints, pigments, and polymers. Existing state-of-the-art correlations for predicting power numbers, however, are inaccurate for impeller Reynolds number <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mfenced>\n <mrow>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mfenced>\n <mo>&gt;</mo>\n <mn>100</mn>\n </mrow></math>. In this study, we compiled a dataset of 1470 data points from 15 research articles in the open literature, covering five types of impellers: (i) anchor; (ii) gate; (iii) single helical ribbon; (iv) double helical ribbon; and (v) helical ribbon with screw. Six machine learning models, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), CatBoost regressor, extra tree regressor, support vector regressor, random forest, and XGBoost regressor, were developed and compared. The results revealed that ANN emerged as the most efficient model, demonstrating the highest testing <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 0.99 and the lowest testing MAPE of 7.3%. Further, we used the ANN model to develop a novel set of process correlations to estimate impeller power numbers for the industrially important anchor and double helical ribbon impellers: which significantly outperform the existing state-of-the-art correlations available in literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"102 11","pages":"3832-3851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of new correlation for the prediction of power number for closed clearance impellers using machine learning methods trained on literature data\",\"authors\":\"Sumit S. Joshi,&nbsp;Vishwanath H. Dalvi,&nbsp;Vivek S. Vitankar,&nbsp;Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,&nbsp;Aniruddha J. Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjce.25385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The accurate estimation of the power number for closed clearance impellers holds significant importance in industries such as chemical, biochemical, paper and pulp, as well as paints, pigments, and polymers. Existing state-of-the-art correlations for predicting power numbers, however, are inaccurate for impeller Reynolds number <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mfenced>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>R</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n <mi>I</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n </mfenced>\\n <mo>&gt;</mo>\\n <mn>100</mn>\\n </mrow></math>. In this study, we compiled a dataset of 1470 data points from 15 research articles in the open literature, covering five types of impellers: (i) anchor; (ii) gate; (iii) single helical ribbon; (iv) double helical ribbon; and (v) helical ribbon with screw. Six machine learning models, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), CatBoost regressor, extra tree regressor, support vector regressor, random forest, and XGBoost regressor, were developed and compared. The results revealed that ANN emerged as the most efficient model, demonstrating the highest testing <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 0.99 and the lowest testing MAPE of 7.3%. Further, we used the ANN model to develop a novel set of process correlations to estimate impeller power numbers for the industrially important anchor and double helical ribbon impellers: which significantly outperform the existing state-of-the-art correlations available in literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"102 11\",\"pages\":\"3832-3851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在化工、生化、造纸和纸浆以及油漆、颜料和聚合物等行业中,准确估算封闭间隙叶轮的功率数具有重要意义。然而,现有的用于预测功率数的最先进相关方法对叶轮雷诺数的计算并不准确。在本研究中,我们从公开文献中的 15 篇研究文章中汇编了一个包含 1470 个数据点的数据集,涵盖五种类型的叶轮:(i) 锚式叶轮;(ii) 闸式叶轮;(iii) 单螺旋带式叶轮;(iv) 双螺旋带式叶轮;(v) 带螺杆的螺旋带式叶轮。开发并比较了六种机器学习模型,即人工神经网络(ANN)、CatBoost 回归器、额外树回归器、支持向量回归器、随机森林和 XGBoost 回归器。结果显示,ANN 是最有效的模型,测试 R2 值最高,为 0.99,测试 MAPE 最低,为 7.3%。此外,我们还利用 ANN 模型开发了一套新的过程相关性,用于估算工业上重要的锚式叶轮和双螺旋带式叶轮的叶轮功率数:其性能明显优于文献中现有的最先进相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of new correlation for the prediction of power number for closed clearance impellers using machine learning methods trained on literature data

The accurate estimation of the power number for closed clearance impellers holds significant importance in industries such as chemical, biochemical, paper and pulp, as well as paints, pigments, and polymers. Existing state-of-the-art correlations for predicting power numbers, however, are inaccurate for impeller Reynolds number R e I > 100 . In this study, we compiled a dataset of 1470 data points from 15 research articles in the open literature, covering five types of impellers: (i) anchor; (ii) gate; (iii) single helical ribbon; (iv) double helical ribbon; and (v) helical ribbon with screw. Six machine learning models, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), CatBoost regressor, extra tree regressor, support vector regressor, random forest, and XGBoost regressor, were developed and compared. The results revealed that ANN emerged as the most efficient model, demonstrating the highest testing R2 value of 0.99 and the lowest testing MAPE of 7.3%. Further, we used the ANN model to develop a novel set of process correlations to estimate impeller power numbers for the industrially important anchor and double helical ribbon impellers: which significantly outperform the existing state-of-the-art correlations available in literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
448
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信