视觉信息对常规三色灵长类动物嗅闻行为的影响

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Brigitte M Weiß, Anja Widdig
{"title":"视觉信息对常规三色灵长类动物嗅闻行为的影响","authors":"Brigitte M Weiß, Anja Widdig","doi":"10.1093/beheco/arae055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most catarrhine primates are considered to be strongly visually oriented, obtaining information about conspecifics and their environment from a diversity of visual cues. Other sensory modalities may provide information that is redundant and/or complimentary to visual cues. When cues from multiple sensory modalities are available, these may reinforce or suppress each other, as shown in several taxa ranging from insects to humans. Here, we tested how the presence and ambiguity of visual information affects the use of olfactory cues when exploring food and non-food items in semi-free ranging Barbary macaques at Affenberg Salem, Germany. We presented monkeys with pipes containing food (peanuts, popcorn), non-food (stones, feces) or no items in transparent or opaque containers, and assessed whether animals looked, sniffed and/or grabbed into the pipes depending on visibility of the contents (experiment 1). Visual information had no robust effect on sniffing probability, but monkeys were more likely to sniff before any other form of inspection if the can was opaque than if it was transparent. Both visual and olfactory information affected, whether or not monkeys attempted to retrieve the items from the pipes, whereby monkeys showed an overall decrease in the propensity to grab after sniffing. Furthermore, we manipulated the visual appearance of familiar food items (popcorn) with food colorant (experiment 2), which resulted in substantially increased olfactory inspections compared to unmanipulated popcorn. Taken together, reliance on the olfactory sense was modulated by the available visual information, emphasizing the interplay between different sensory modalities for obtaining information about the environment.","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of visual information on sniffing behavior in a routinely trichromatic primate\",\"authors\":\"Brigitte M Weiß, Anja Widdig\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/beheco/arae055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most catarrhine primates are considered to be strongly visually oriented, obtaining information about conspecifics and their environment from a diversity of visual cues. Other sensory modalities may provide information that is redundant and/or complimentary to visual cues. When cues from multiple sensory modalities are available, these may reinforce or suppress each other, as shown in several taxa ranging from insects to humans. Here, we tested how the presence and ambiguity of visual information affects the use of olfactory cues when exploring food and non-food items in semi-free ranging Barbary macaques at Affenberg Salem, Germany. We presented monkeys with pipes containing food (peanuts, popcorn), non-food (stones, feces) or no items in transparent or opaque containers, and assessed whether animals looked, sniffed and/or grabbed into the pipes depending on visibility of the contents (experiment 1). Visual information had no robust effect on sniffing probability, but monkeys were more likely to sniff before any other form of inspection if the can was opaque than if it was transparent. Both visual and olfactory information affected, whether or not monkeys attempted to retrieve the items from the pipes, whereby monkeys showed an overall decrease in the propensity to grab after sniffing. Furthermore, we manipulated the visual appearance of familiar food items (popcorn) with food colorant (experiment 2), which resulted in substantially increased olfactory inspections compared to unmanipulated popcorn. Taken together, reliance on the olfactory sense was modulated by the available visual information, emphasizing the interplay between different sensory modalities for obtaining information about the environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arae055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arae055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数猫科灵长类动物被认为具有强烈的视觉导向性,它们从多种视觉线索中获取关于同类和环境的信息。其他感觉模式可能会提供多余的信息和/或补充视觉线索的信息。正如从昆虫到人类的多个类群所显示的那样,当有多种感觉模式的线索时,这些线索可能会相互加强或相互抑制。在这里,我们测试了在德国阿芬贝格萨勒姆,半自由活动的巴巴利猕猴在探索食物和非食物时,视觉信息的存在和模糊性如何影响嗅觉线索的使用。我们向猕猴展示了装有食物(花生、爆米花)、非食物(石头、粪便)或不装任何物品的透明或不透明容器,并评估了猕猴是否会根据管内物品的可见度来观察、嗅闻和/或抓取管内物品(实验 1)。视觉信息对嗅觉概率没有明显影响,但如果罐子是不透明的,猴子更有可能先嗅后看。视觉和嗅觉信息都会影响猴子是否试图从管道中拾取物品,因此猴子在嗅闻后抓取物品的倾向性总体上有所下降。此外,我们用食物着色剂操纵了熟悉的食物(爆米花)的视觉外观(实验 2),结果与未操纵的爆米花相比,嗅觉检查大大增加。总之,对嗅觉的依赖受可用视觉信息的调节,这强调了不同感官模式在获取环境信息方面的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of visual information on sniffing behavior in a routinely trichromatic primate
Most catarrhine primates are considered to be strongly visually oriented, obtaining information about conspecifics and their environment from a diversity of visual cues. Other sensory modalities may provide information that is redundant and/or complimentary to visual cues. When cues from multiple sensory modalities are available, these may reinforce or suppress each other, as shown in several taxa ranging from insects to humans. Here, we tested how the presence and ambiguity of visual information affects the use of olfactory cues when exploring food and non-food items in semi-free ranging Barbary macaques at Affenberg Salem, Germany. We presented monkeys with pipes containing food (peanuts, popcorn), non-food (stones, feces) or no items in transparent or opaque containers, and assessed whether animals looked, sniffed and/or grabbed into the pipes depending on visibility of the contents (experiment 1). Visual information had no robust effect on sniffing probability, but monkeys were more likely to sniff before any other form of inspection if the can was opaque than if it was transparent. Both visual and olfactory information affected, whether or not monkeys attempted to retrieve the items from the pipes, whereby monkeys showed an overall decrease in the propensity to grab after sniffing. Furthermore, we manipulated the visual appearance of familiar food items (popcorn) with food colorant (experiment 2), which resulted in substantially increased olfactory inspections compared to unmanipulated popcorn. Taken together, reliance on the olfactory sense was modulated by the available visual information, emphasizing the interplay between different sensory modalities for obtaining information about the environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信