用于太阳风传播延迟估计的各种机器学习模型的比较分析

IF 2.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Hemapriya Raju, Saurabh Das
{"title":"用于太阳风传播延迟估计的各种机器学习模型的比较分析","authors":"Hemapriya Raju,&nbsp;Saurabh Das","doi":"10.1007/s11207-024-02339-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geomagnetic storms resulting from solar disturbances impact telecommunication and satellite systems. Satellites are positioned at Lagrange point L1 to monitor these disturbances and give warning 30 min to 1 h ahead. As propagation delay from L1 to Earth depends on various factors, estimating the delay using the assumption of ballistic propagation can result in greater uncertainty. In this study, we aim to reduce the uncertainty in the propagation delay by using machine-learning (ML) models. Solar-wind velocity components (<span>\\(V_{ \\mathrm{x}}\\)</span>, <span>\\(V_{\\mathrm{y}}\\)</span>, <span>\\(V_{\\mathrm{z}}\\)</span>), the position of Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) at all three coordinates (<span>\\(r_{\\mathrm{x}}\\)</span>, <span>\\(r_{\\mathrm{y}}\\)</span>, <span>\\(r_{\\mathrm{z}}\\)</span>), and the Earth’s dipole tilt angle at the time of the disturbances are taken as input parameters. The target is the time taken by the disturbances to reach from L1 to the magnetosphere. The study involves a comparison of eight ML models that are trained across three different speed ranges of solar-wind disturbances. For low and very high-speed solar wind, the vector-delay method fares better than the flat-plane propagation method and ML models. Ridge regression performs consistently better at all three speed ranges in ML models. For high-speed solar wind, boosting models perform well with an error of around 3.8 min better than the vector-delay model. Studying the best-performing models through variable-importance measures, the velocity component <span>\\(V_{\\mathrm{x}}\\)</span> is identified as the most important feature for the estimation and aligns well with the flat-plane propagation method. Additionally, for slow solar-wind disturbances, the position of ACE is seen as the second most important feature in ridge regression, while high-speed disturbances emphasize the importance of other vector components of solar-wind speed over the ACE position. This work improves our understanding of the propagation delay of different solar-wind speed and showcases the potential of ML in space weather prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"299 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Various Machine-Learning Models for Solar-Wind Propagation-Delay Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Hemapriya Raju,&nbsp;Saurabh Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11207-024-02339-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Geomagnetic storms resulting from solar disturbances impact telecommunication and satellite systems. Satellites are positioned at Lagrange point L1 to monitor these disturbances and give warning 30 min to 1 h ahead. As propagation delay from L1 to Earth depends on various factors, estimating the delay using the assumption of ballistic propagation can result in greater uncertainty. In this study, we aim to reduce the uncertainty in the propagation delay by using machine-learning (ML) models. Solar-wind velocity components (<span>\\\\(V_{ \\\\mathrm{x}}\\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(V_{\\\\mathrm{y}}\\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(V_{\\\\mathrm{z}}\\\\)</span>), the position of Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) at all three coordinates (<span>\\\\(r_{\\\\mathrm{x}}\\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(r_{\\\\mathrm{y}}\\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(r_{\\\\mathrm{z}}\\\\)</span>), and the Earth’s dipole tilt angle at the time of the disturbances are taken as input parameters. The target is the time taken by the disturbances to reach from L1 to the magnetosphere. The study involves a comparison of eight ML models that are trained across three different speed ranges of solar-wind disturbances. For low and very high-speed solar wind, the vector-delay method fares better than the flat-plane propagation method and ML models. Ridge regression performs consistently better at all three speed ranges in ML models. For high-speed solar wind, boosting models perform well with an error of around 3.8 min better than the vector-delay model. Studying the best-performing models through variable-importance measures, the velocity component <span>\\\\(V_{\\\\mathrm{x}}\\\\)</span> is identified as the most important feature for the estimation and aligns well with the flat-plane propagation method. Additionally, for slow solar-wind disturbances, the position of ACE is seen as the second most important feature in ridge regression, while high-speed disturbances emphasize the importance of other vector components of solar-wind speed over the ACE position. This work improves our understanding of the propagation delay of different solar-wind speed and showcases the potential of ML in space weather prediction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar Physics\",\"volume\":\"299 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02339-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02339-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

太阳扰动导致的地磁暴会影响电信和卫星系统。卫星位于拉格朗日点 L1,用于监测这些干扰,并提前 30 分钟至 1 小时发出警告。由于从拉格朗日点 L1 到地球的传播延迟取决于各种因素,因此使用弹道传播假设来估算延迟会导致更大的不确定性。在这项研究中,我们旨在利用机器学习(ML)模型来减少传播延迟的不确定性。太阳风速度分量(\(V_{ \mathrm{x}}\), \(V_{ \mathrm{y}}\), \(V_{ \mathrm{z}}\) )、高级合成探测器(ACE)在所有三个坐标上的位置(\(r_{ \mathrm{x}}\)、\(r_{/mathrm{y}}\)、\(r_{/mathrm{z}}\))以及扰动发生时的地球偶极倾角作为输入参数。目标是扰动从 L1 到达磁层所需的时间。这项研究包括对八个 ML 模型进行比较,这些模型是在三个不同的太阳风扰动速度范围内训练出来的。对于低速和超高速太阳风,矢量延迟法比平面传播法和 ML 模型表现更好。在所有三个速度范围内,岭回归在 ML 模型中的表现一直较好。对于高速太阳风,助推模型表现良好,误差约为 3.8 分钟,优于矢量延迟模型。通过变量重要性度量研究表现最佳的模型,速度分量 \(V_\{mathrm{x}}\)被认为是估算中最重要的特征,并且与平面传播方法非常吻合。此外,对于慢速太阳风扰动,ACE 的位置被视为脊回归中第二重要的特征,而高速扰动则强调太阳风速度的其他矢量分量比 ACE 位置更重要。这项工作提高了我们对不同太阳风速度传播延迟的理解,并展示了 ML 在空间天气预报中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Analysis of Various Machine-Learning Models for Solar-Wind Propagation-Delay Estimation

Comparative Analysis of Various Machine-Learning Models for Solar-Wind Propagation-Delay Estimation

Comparative Analysis of Various Machine-Learning Models for Solar-Wind Propagation-Delay Estimation

Geomagnetic storms resulting from solar disturbances impact telecommunication and satellite systems. Satellites are positioned at Lagrange point L1 to monitor these disturbances and give warning 30 min to 1 h ahead. As propagation delay from L1 to Earth depends on various factors, estimating the delay using the assumption of ballistic propagation can result in greater uncertainty. In this study, we aim to reduce the uncertainty in the propagation delay by using machine-learning (ML) models. Solar-wind velocity components (\(V_{ \mathrm{x}}\), \(V_{\mathrm{y}}\), \(V_{\mathrm{z}}\)), the position of Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) at all three coordinates (\(r_{\mathrm{x}}\), \(r_{\mathrm{y}}\), \(r_{\mathrm{z}}\)), and the Earth’s dipole tilt angle at the time of the disturbances are taken as input parameters. The target is the time taken by the disturbances to reach from L1 to the magnetosphere. The study involves a comparison of eight ML models that are trained across three different speed ranges of solar-wind disturbances. For low and very high-speed solar wind, the vector-delay method fares better than the flat-plane propagation method and ML models. Ridge regression performs consistently better at all three speed ranges in ML models. For high-speed solar wind, boosting models perform well with an error of around 3.8 min better than the vector-delay model. Studying the best-performing models through variable-importance measures, the velocity component \(V_{\mathrm{x}}\) is identified as the most important feature for the estimation and aligns well with the flat-plane propagation method. Additionally, for slow solar-wind disturbances, the position of ACE is seen as the second most important feature in ridge regression, while high-speed disturbances emphasize the importance of other vector components of solar-wind speed over the ACE position. This work improves our understanding of the propagation delay of different solar-wind speed and showcases the potential of ML in space weather prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Solar Physics
Solar Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
17.90%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Solar Physics was founded in 1967 and is the principal journal for the publication of the results of fundamental research on the Sun. The journal treats all aspects of solar physics, ranging from the internal structure of the Sun and its evolution to the outer corona and solar wind in interplanetary space. Papers on solar-terrestrial physics and on stellar research are also published when their results have a direct bearing on our understanding of the Sun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信