在城市住宅开发过程中,减压和有机添加物可在短期内改善土壤健康状况

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
M.D. McDaniel, G.L. Thompson, P. Sauer
{"title":"在城市住宅开发过程中,减压和有机添加物可在短期内改善土壤健康状况","authors":"M.D. McDaniel, G.L. Thompson, P. Sauer","doi":"10.2489/jswc.2024.00111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban land use, characterized by intense soil disturbance for site development, is rapidly expanding across the globe. This disturbance can have long-lasting effects on urban soil ecosystem service performance (e.g., water infiltration, turfgrass growth, and carbon [C] sequestration). We established a unique, multistakeholder collaboration with a private land-development company, environmental advisory nonprofit organization, and research university to study residential development effects on soil health and the effectiveness of rehabilitation practices. More specifically, we tested the impact of five current, locally recommended soil rehabilitation practices implemented at early stages of urban, residential development. In a controlled, real-world setting, we tested five treatments—a combination of decompaction and organic amendment additions—after major soil disturbances of mass and fine grading (part of subdivision development). Specific treatments included (1) a business-as-usual (or control) with compacted subsoil and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (2) mechanically decompacted subsoil and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (3) biologically decompacted subsoil using a green manure (with tillage radish [ Raphanus sativus ]) and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (4) mechanically decompacted subsoil with 2.5 cm of loosened topsoil mixed with 2.5 cm compost, and (5) mechanically decompacted subsoil mixed with 2.5 cm compost and 2.5 cm loosened topsoil. After turfgrass was established in all plots, per typical practice for erosion control, we measured physical, chemical, and biological soil health properties at 0 to 15 and 15 to 30 cm depths. The tillage radish had little-to-no effect on any soil properties, likely due to poor establishment. Compost amendments increased soil organic matter (+43%), soil test phosphorus (+79%), and soil test potassium (+60%) mostly in the top 0 to 15 cm. Compost amendments had little effect on soil microbial biomass and activity (measured as decomposition); however, they did increase salt-extractable organic C in the top 0 to 15 cm (+220%). We found even stronger effects of mechanical subsoil decompaction, which increased infiltration rate by over 2,000% and time-to-runoff by 463%, on average, providing evidence that deep ripping subsoils improves water influx and reduces runoff from residential lawns. Decompacting subsoil and adding compost had clear benefits to physical and chemical soil health early in urban, residential development. We would recommend land developers use both practices for improving soil ecosystem services in the short term, and there may be longer-term benefits too.","PeriodicalId":50049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decompaction and organic amendments provide short-term improvements in soil health during urban, residential development\",\"authors\":\"M.D. McDaniel, G.L. Thompson, P. Sauer\",\"doi\":\"10.2489/jswc.2024.00111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Urban land use, characterized by intense soil disturbance for site development, is rapidly expanding across the globe. This disturbance can have long-lasting effects on urban soil ecosystem service performance (e.g., water infiltration, turfgrass growth, and carbon [C] sequestration). We established a unique, multistakeholder collaboration with a private land-development company, environmental advisory nonprofit organization, and research university to study residential development effects on soil health and the effectiveness of rehabilitation practices. More specifically, we tested the impact of five current, locally recommended soil rehabilitation practices implemented at early stages of urban, residential development. In a controlled, real-world setting, we tested five treatments—a combination of decompaction and organic amendment additions—after major soil disturbances of mass and fine grading (part of subdivision development). Specific treatments included (1) a business-as-usual (or control) with compacted subsoil and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (2) mechanically decompacted subsoil and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (3) biologically decompacted subsoil using a green manure (with tillage radish [ Raphanus sativus ]) and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (4) mechanically decompacted subsoil with 2.5 cm of loosened topsoil mixed with 2.5 cm compost, and (5) mechanically decompacted subsoil mixed with 2.5 cm compost and 2.5 cm loosened topsoil. After turfgrass was established in all plots, per typical practice for erosion control, we measured physical, chemical, and biological soil health properties at 0 to 15 and 15 to 30 cm depths. The tillage radish had little-to-no effect on any soil properties, likely due to poor establishment. Compost amendments increased soil organic matter (+43%), soil test phosphorus (+79%), and soil test potassium (+60%) mostly in the top 0 to 15 cm. Compost amendments had little effect on soil microbial biomass and activity (measured as decomposition); however, they did increase salt-extractable organic C in the top 0 to 15 cm (+220%). We found even stronger effects of mechanical subsoil decompaction, which increased infiltration rate by over 2,000% and time-to-runoff by 463%, on average, providing evidence that deep ripping subsoils improves water influx and reduces runoff from residential lawns. Decompacting subsoil and adding compost had clear benefits to physical and chemical soil health early in urban, residential development. We would recommend land developers use both practices for improving soil ecosystem services in the short term, and there may be longer-term benefits too.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2024.00111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2024.00111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市土地使用的特点是因场地开发而对土壤造成严重扰动,这种情况正在全球范围内迅速蔓延。这种干扰会对城市土壤生态系统服务性能(如水渗透、草皮生长和碳(C)固存)产生长期影响。我们与一家私人土地开发公司、一家非营利性环境咨询机构和一所研究型大学建立了独特的多方合作关系,共同研究住宅开发对土壤健康的影响以及修复措施的有效性。更具体地说,我们测试了当前当地推荐的五种土壤修复方法在城市住宅开发早期阶段实施的影响。在受控的实际环境中,我们测试了大规模和精细平整(分区开发的一部分)等重大土壤扰动后的五种处理方法--减压和添加有机改良剂的组合。具体处理方法包括:(1)一切照旧(或对照),底土压实,表土松动 10 厘米;(2)底土机械减压,表土松动 10 厘米;(3)使用绿肥(耕作萝卜[Raphanus sativus])对底土进行生物减压,表土松动 10 厘米;(4)底土机械减压,表土松动 2.5 厘米的疏松表土与 2.5 厘米的堆肥混合,以及(5)机械减压的底土与 2.5 厘米的堆肥和 2.5 厘米的疏松表土混合。按照控制侵蚀的典型做法,在所有地块种植草皮草后,我们测量了 0 至 15 厘米和 15 至 30 厘米深度的土壤物理、化学和生物健康属性。耕作萝卜对任何土壤特性几乎没有影响,这可能是由于建植不良造成的。堆肥添加剂增加了土壤有机质(+43%)、土壤测试磷(+79%)和土壤测试钾(+60%),主要集中在顶部 0 至 15 厘米处。堆肥添加剂对土壤微生物的生物量和活性(以分解量衡量)几乎没有影响;但是,堆肥添加剂确实增加了顶部 0-15 厘米处的盐提取有机碳(+220%)。我们发现,底土机械减压的效果更为显著,平均而言,其入渗率提高了 2000% 以上,径流时间延长了 463%。在城市住宅开发的早期阶段,深翻底土和添加堆肥对土壤的物理和化学健康有明显的好处。我们建议土地开发商在短期内使用这两种方法来改善土壤生态系统服务,而且还可能带来长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decompaction and organic amendments provide short-term improvements in soil health during urban, residential development
Urban land use, characterized by intense soil disturbance for site development, is rapidly expanding across the globe. This disturbance can have long-lasting effects on urban soil ecosystem service performance (e.g., water infiltration, turfgrass growth, and carbon [C] sequestration). We established a unique, multistakeholder collaboration with a private land-development company, environmental advisory nonprofit organization, and research university to study residential development effects on soil health and the effectiveness of rehabilitation practices. More specifically, we tested the impact of five current, locally recommended soil rehabilitation practices implemented at early stages of urban, residential development. In a controlled, real-world setting, we tested five treatments—a combination of decompaction and organic amendment additions—after major soil disturbances of mass and fine grading (part of subdivision development). Specific treatments included (1) a business-as-usual (or control) with compacted subsoil and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (2) mechanically decompacted subsoil and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (3) biologically decompacted subsoil using a green manure (with tillage radish [ Raphanus sativus ]) and 10 cm loosened topsoil, (4) mechanically decompacted subsoil with 2.5 cm of loosened topsoil mixed with 2.5 cm compost, and (5) mechanically decompacted subsoil mixed with 2.5 cm compost and 2.5 cm loosened topsoil. After turfgrass was established in all plots, per typical practice for erosion control, we measured physical, chemical, and biological soil health properties at 0 to 15 and 15 to 30 cm depths. The tillage radish had little-to-no effect on any soil properties, likely due to poor establishment. Compost amendments increased soil organic matter (+43%), soil test phosphorus (+79%), and soil test potassium (+60%) mostly in the top 0 to 15 cm. Compost amendments had little effect on soil microbial biomass and activity (measured as decomposition); however, they did increase salt-extractable organic C in the top 0 to 15 cm (+220%). We found even stronger effects of mechanical subsoil decompaction, which increased infiltration rate by over 2,000% and time-to-runoff by 463%, on average, providing evidence that deep ripping subsoils improves water influx and reduces runoff from residential lawns. Decompacting subsoil and adding compost had clear benefits to physical and chemical soil health early in urban, residential development. We would recommend land developers use both practices for improving soil ecosystem services in the short term, and there may be longer-term benefits too.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (JSWC) is a multidisciplinary journal of natural resource conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. The journal has two sections: the A Section containing various departments and features, and the Research Section containing peer-reviewed research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信