地下土壤是否是深施磷肥的化学性质更为恶劣的区域?

William Tucker, Fien Degryse, Therese McBeath, Ehsan Tavakkoli, Michael McLaughlin
{"title":"地下土壤是否是深施磷肥的化学性质更为恶劣的区域?","authors":"William Tucker,&nbsp;Fien Degryse,&nbsp;Therese McBeath,&nbsp;Ehsan Tavakkoli,&nbsp;Michael McLaughlin","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The susceptibility of surface soil to drying when rainfall is scarce has prompted evaluation of deeper placement (20 cm) of fertilizers within the profile to where soil moisture is more likely to be stored. However, concerns arise regarding potential chemical challenges to P availability in the subsurface. This study examined differences in chemical conditions between the soil surface (0–10 cm) and subsurface (15–25 cm), and investigated the effect on the diffusion and extractability of banded P. Analysis of surface and subsurface samples from 15 sites revealed substantial differences in characteristics that influence P behavior between depths. The phosphorus buffering index (PBI) was largely explained by concentrations of amorphous Al and Fe (hydr)oxides and CaCO<sub>3</sub>. The measured diffusion distance of P from monoammonium phosphate (MAP) granules was found to be inversely related to PBI. Consequently, significant differences in diffusion distances were typically observed between soil layers characterized by marked PBI variations. The measured diffusion radii were used to calculate the mean P concentrations of surface-banded and deep-banded MAP in a field scenario, which were replicated in a 4-week laboratory incubation. The resulting lability of applied P was determined through isotopic exchange, and although significantly higher P recoveries were measured from the subsurface at two sites where large pH differences existed between depths, no significant differences were measured between depths at all other sites. Hence, the subsurface is not a more hostile zone for deep-placed P.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20724","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is subsurface soil a chemically more hostile zone for deep-placed phosphorus fertilizer?\",\"authors\":\"William Tucker,&nbsp;Fien Degryse,&nbsp;Therese McBeath,&nbsp;Ehsan Tavakkoli,&nbsp;Michael McLaughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The susceptibility of surface soil to drying when rainfall is scarce has prompted evaluation of deeper placement (20 cm) of fertilizers within the profile to where soil moisture is more likely to be stored. However, concerns arise regarding potential chemical challenges to P availability in the subsurface. This study examined differences in chemical conditions between the soil surface (0–10 cm) and subsurface (15–25 cm), and investigated the effect on the diffusion and extractability of banded P. Analysis of surface and subsurface samples from 15 sites revealed substantial differences in characteristics that influence P behavior between depths. The phosphorus buffering index (PBI) was largely explained by concentrations of amorphous Al and Fe (hydr)oxides and CaCO<sub>3</sub>. The measured diffusion distance of P from monoammonium phosphate (MAP) granules was found to be inversely related to PBI. Consequently, significant differences in diffusion distances were typically observed between soil layers characterized by marked PBI variations. The measured diffusion radii were used to calculate the mean P concentrations of surface-banded and deep-banded MAP in a field scenario, which were replicated in a 4-week laboratory incubation. The resulting lability of applied P was determined through isotopic exchange, and although significantly higher P recoveries were measured from the subsurface at two sites where large pH differences existed between depths, no significant differences were measured between depths at all other sites. Hence, the subsurface is not a more hostile zone for deep-placed P.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20724\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

降雨稀少时,表层土壤容易干燥,这促使人们评估在土壤水分更有可能储存的剖面内更深(20 厘米)的位置施肥。然而,地下土壤中潜在的化学物质对 P 供应的挑战也引起了人们的关注。这项研究考察了土壤表层(0-10 厘米)和表层下(15-25 厘米)之间化学条件的差异,并研究了其对带状钾的扩散和萃取的影响。对 15 个地点的表层和表层下样本进行分析后发现,不同深度之间影响钾行为的特征存在很大差异。磷缓冲指数(PBI)在很大程度上是由无定形的铝和铁(水)氧化物以及 CaCO3 的浓度决定的。从磷酸一铵(MAP)颗粒中测得的磷扩散距离与磷缓冲指数成反比。因此,在具有明显 PBI 变化特征的土层之间,通常会观察到扩散距离的显著差异。测得的扩散半径用于计算表层带状和深层带状 MAP 在田间的平均 P 浓度,并在为期 4 周的实验室培养中进行了复制。通过同位素交换确定了施用磷的稳定性,虽然在两个深度之间存在较大 pH 值差异的地点测得的地下磷回收率明显较高,但在所有其他地点测得的深度之间没有明显差异。因此,对于深层施用的钾来说,地下并不是一个更不利的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is subsurface soil a chemically more hostile zone for deep-placed phosphorus fertilizer?

Is subsurface soil a chemically more hostile zone for deep-placed phosphorus fertilizer?

The susceptibility of surface soil to drying when rainfall is scarce has prompted evaluation of deeper placement (20 cm) of fertilizers within the profile to where soil moisture is more likely to be stored. However, concerns arise regarding potential chemical challenges to P availability in the subsurface. This study examined differences in chemical conditions between the soil surface (0–10 cm) and subsurface (15–25 cm), and investigated the effect on the diffusion and extractability of banded P. Analysis of surface and subsurface samples from 15 sites revealed substantial differences in characteristics that influence P behavior between depths. The phosphorus buffering index (PBI) was largely explained by concentrations of amorphous Al and Fe (hydr)oxides and CaCO3. The measured diffusion distance of P from monoammonium phosphate (MAP) granules was found to be inversely related to PBI. Consequently, significant differences in diffusion distances were typically observed between soil layers characterized by marked PBI variations. The measured diffusion radii were used to calculate the mean P concentrations of surface-banded and deep-banded MAP in a field scenario, which were replicated in a 4-week laboratory incubation. The resulting lability of applied P was determined through isotopic exchange, and although significantly higher P recoveries were measured from the subsurface at two sites where large pH differences existed between depths, no significant differences were measured between depths at all other sites. Hence, the subsurface is not a more hostile zone for deep-placed P.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信