利用机器学习在在线学习环境中进行可通用的无传感器挫折检测

IF 3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Mohammad Mustaneer Rahman, Robert Ollington, Soonja Yeom, Nadia Ollington
{"title":"利用机器学习在在线学习环境中进行可通用的无传感器挫折检测","authors":"Mohammad Mustaneer Rahman, Robert Ollington, Soonja Yeom, Nadia Ollington","doi":"10.1007/s11257-024-09402-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Learning can generally be categorised into three domains, which include cognitive (thinking), affective (emotions or feeling) and psychomotor (physical or kinesthetic). In the learner model, acknowledging the affective aspects of learning is important for a range of learner outcomes, including motivation, persistence, and engagement. Learners’ affective states can be detected using physical (e.g. cameras) and physiological sensors (e.g., EEG) in online learning. Although these detectors demonstrate high accuracy, they raise privacy concerns for learners and present challenges in deploying them on a large scale to larger groups of students or in classroom settings. Consequently, researchers have designed an alternative method that can recognise students’ affective states at any point during online learning from their interaction with a computer-based learning platform (i.e. intelligent tutoring systems) without using any sensors. Existing sensor-free affect detectors however, are less accurate and not directly generalisable to other domains and systems. This research focuses on developing generalisable sensor-free affect detectors to identify students’ frustration during online learning using machine learning classifiers. The detectors were built by identifying minimal optimal features associated with frustration from the high-dimensional feature space through a series of experiments on a real-world students’ affective dataset, which are generalisable across various learning platforms and domains. To evaluate their accuracy and generalisability, the detectors’ performance was validated on two independent datasets collected from different educational institutions. The experimental results show that cost-sensitive Bayesian classifiers can achieve higher affect detection accuracies with a small number of generalisable features compared to other classifiers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49388,"journal":{"name":"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalisable sensor-free frustration detection in online learning environments using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Mustaneer Rahman, Robert Ollington, Soonja Yeom, Nadia Ollington\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11257-024-09402-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Learning can generally be categorised into three domains, which include cognitive (thinking), affective (emotions or feeling) and psychomotor (physical or kinesthetic). In the learner model, acknowledging the affective aspects of learning is important for a range of learner outcomes, including motivation, persistence, and engagement. Learners’ affective states can be detected using physical (e.g. cameras) and physiological sensors (e.g., EEG) in online learning. Although these detectors demonstrate high accuracy, they raise privacy concerns for learners and present challenges in deploying them on a large scale to larger groups of students or in classroom settings. Consequently, researchers have designed an alternative method that can recognise students’ affective states at any point during online learning from their interaction with a computer-based learning platform (i.e. intelligent tutoring systems) without using any sensors. Existing sensor-free affect detectors however, are less accurate and not directly generalisable to other domains and systems. This research focuses on developing generalisable sensor-free affect detectors to identify students’ frustration during online learning using machine learning classifiers. The detectors were built by identifying minimal optimal features associated with frustration from the high-dimensional feature space through a series of experiments on a real-world students’ affective dataset, which are generalisable across various learning platforms and domains. To evaluate their accuracy and generalisability, the detectors’ performance was validated on two independent datasets collected from different educational institutions. The experimental results show that cost-sensitive Bayesian classifiers can achieve higher affect detection accuracies with a small number of generalisable features compared to other classifiers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-024-09402-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-024-09402-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习一般可分为三个领域,包括认知(思维)、情感(情绪或感觉)和精神运动(体能或动觉)。在学习者模式中,承认学习的情感方面对学习者的一系列成果非常重要,包括学习动机、坚持性和参与性。在在线学习中,可以使用物理传感器(如摄像头)和生理传感器(如脑电图)检测学习者的情感状态。虽然这些检测器显示出很高的准确性,但它们会引起学习者隐私方面的担忧,而且在大规模地将它们部署到更大的学生群体或教室环境中时也会面临挑战。因此,研究人员设计了一种替代方法,可以在不使用任何传感器的情况下,通过学生与基于计算机的学习平台(即智能辅导系统)的交互,识别学生在线学习过程中任何时候的情感状态。然而,现有的无传感器情感检测器准确性较低,而且不能直接推广到其他领域和系统。本研究的重点是开发可通用的无传感器情感检测器,利用机器学习分类器识别学生在在线学习过程中的挫败感。通过在真实世界的学生情感数据集上进行一系列实验,从高维特征空间中识别出与挫败感相关的最小最优特征,从而建立了这些检测器,这些检测器可在各种学习平台和领域中通用。为了评估其准确性和通用性,在从不同教育机构收集的两个独立数据集上对检测器的性能进行了验证。实验结果表明,与其他分类器相比,对成本敏感的贝叶斯分类器只需少量可泛化特征,就能实现更高的情感检测准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Generalisable sensor-free frustration detection in online learning environments using machine learning

Generalisable sensor-free frustration detection in online learning environments using machine learning

Learning can generally be categorised into three domains, which include cognitive (thinking), affective (emotions or feeling) and psychomotor (physical or kinesthetic). In the learner model, acknowledging the affective aspects of learning is important for a range of learner outcomes, including motivation, persistence, and engagement. Learners’ affective states can be detected using physical (e.g. cameras) and physiological sensors (e.g., EEG) in online learning. Although these detectors demonstrate high accuracy, they raise privacy concerns for learners and present challenges in deploying them on a large scale to larger groups of students or in classroom settings. Consequently, researchers have designed an alternative method that can recognise students’ affective states at any point during online learning from their interaction with a computer-based learning platform (i.e. intelligent tutoring systems) without using any sensors. Existing sensor-free affect detectors however, are less accurate and not directly generalisable to other domains and systems. This research focuses on developing generalisable sensor-free affect detectors to identify students’ frustration during online learning using machine learning classifiers. The detectors were built by identifying minimal optimal features associated with frustration from the high-dimensional feature space through a series of experiments on a real-world students’ affective dataset, which are generalisable across various learning platforms and domains. To evaluate their accuracy and generalisability, the detectors’ performance was validated on two independent datasets collected from different educational institutions. The experimental results show that cost-sensitive Bayesian classifiers can achieve higher affect detection accuracies with a small number of generalisable features compared to other classifiers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction provides an interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of novel and significant original research results about interactive computer systems that can adapt themselves to their users, and on the design, use, and evaluation of user models for adaptation. The journal publishes high-quality original papers from, e.g., the following areas: acquisition and formal representation of user models; conceptual models and user stereotypes for personalization; student modeling and adaptive learning; models of groups of users; user model driven personalised information discovery and retrieval; recommender systems; adaptive user interfaces and agents; adaptation for accessibility and inclusion; generic user modeling systems and tools; interoperability of user models; personalization in areas such as; affective computing; ubiquitous and mobile computing; language based interactions; multi-modal interactions; virtual and augmented reality; social media and the Web; human-robot interaction; behaviour change interventions; personalized applications in specific domains; privacy, accountability, and security of information for personalization; responsible adaptation: fairness, accountability, explainability, transparency and control; methods for the design and evaluation of user models and adaptive systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信