{"title":"前臂抬高加压试验:一种新型的腕管综合征试验。","authors":"C H Hawkes, G Cutter","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcae121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the time available to spend with patients decreases, a rapid test for bedside diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) could be useful.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We describe the forearm elevation-compression test (FECT) in this context. The FECT was assessed in 40 patients with clinically suspected CTS and compared to Tinel's and Phalen's signs. Routine electromyography and nerve conduction tests (EMG/NCT) were performed in all cases. In addition, 85 healthy controls were examined by FECT and compared to the patient group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three provocative tests, particularly FECT, were frequently positive in suspected CTS. Neurophysiological tests were normal in 5 of 40 cases of clinically suspected CTS, and the FECT was positive in all of these suggesting a positive predictive value of 87.5% if one accepts EMG/NCT as the reference. Amongst the healthy controls, 18 of 85 (21.2%) were positive on the FECT suggestive of a high false-positive rate or subclinical disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is proposed that the FECT is a useful addition to the clinical examination of suspected CTS. Although the positive rate may be falsely elevated, this is offset by restricting the latency for tingling onset to 10 s or less (FECT2).</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"777-780"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The forearm elevation-compression test: a novel test for carpal tunnel syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"C H Hawkes, G Cutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/qjmed/hcae121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the time available to spend with patients decreases, a rapid test for bedside diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) could be useful.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We describe the forearm elevation-compression test (FECT) in this context. The FECT was assessed in 40 patients with clinically suspected CTS and compared to Tinel's and Phalen's signs. Routine electromyography and nerve conduction tests (EMG/NCT) were performed in all cases. In addition, 85 healthy controls were examined by FECT and compared to the patient group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three provocative tests, particularly FECT, were frequently positive in suspected CTS. Neurophysiological tests were normal in 5 of 40 cases of clinically suspected CTS, and the FECT was positive in all of these suggesting a positive predictive value of 87.5% if one accepts EMG/NCT as the reference. Amongst the healthy controls, 18 of 85 (21.2%) were positive on the FECT suggestive of a high false-positive rate or subclinical disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is proposed that the FECT is a useful addition to the clinical examination of suspected CTS. Although the positive rate may be falsely elevated, this is offset by restricting the latency for tingling onset to 10 s or less (FECT2).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"777-780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The forearm elevation-compression test: a novel test for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Background: As the time available to spend with patients decreases, a rapid test for bedside diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) could be useful.
Design and methods: We describe the forearm elevation-compression test (FECT) in this context. The FECT was assessed in 40 patients with clinically suspected CTS and compared to Tinel's and Phalen's signs. Routine electromyography and nerve conduction tests (EMG/NCT) were performed in all cases. In addition, 85 healthy controls were examined by FECT and compared to the patient group.
Results: All three provocative tests, particularly FECT, were frequently positive in suspected CTS. Neurophysiological tests were normal in 5 of 40 cases of clinically suspected CTS, and the FECT was positive in all of these suggesting a positive predictive value of 87.5% if one accepts EMG/NCT as the reference. Amongst the healthy controls, 18 of 85 (21.2%) were positive on the FECT suggestive of a high false-positive rate or subclinical disease.
Conclusion: It is proposed that the FECT is a useful addition to the clinical examination of suspected CTS. Although the positive rate may be falsely elevated, this is offset by restricting the latency for tingling onset to 10 s or less (FECT2).
期刊介绍:
QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles.
Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence.
In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.