{"title":"关于新型β-内酰胺类药物和β-内酰胺与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复方制剂治疗耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌引起的肺炎的药代动力学和药效学的系统综述。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Novel beta-lactams show activity against many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause severe lung infections. Understanding pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of these agents may help optimise outcomes in the treatment of pneumonia.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe and appraise studies that report pulmonary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Scopus libraries were used for the literature search. Pulmonary population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies on adult patients receiving cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Two independent authors screened, reviewed and extracted data from included articles. A reporting guideline for clinical pharmacokinetic studies (ClinPK statement) was used for bias assessment. Relevant outcomes were included, such as population pharmacokinetic parameters and probability of target attainment of dosing regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-four articles were included. There was heterogeneity in study methods and reporting of results, with diversity across studies in adhering to the ClinPK statement checklist. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most studied agent. Only two studies collected epithelial lining fluid samples from patients with pneumonia. All the other phase I studies enrolled healthy subjects. Significant population heterogeneity was evident among available population pharmacokinetic models. Probabilities of target attainment rates above 90% using current licensed dosing regiments were reported in most studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although lung pharmacokinetics was rarely described, this review observed high target attainment using plasma pharmacokinetic data for all novel beta-lactams. Future studies should describe lung pharmacokinetics in patient populations at risk of carbapenem-resistant pathogen infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001845/pdfft?md5=4e6d895c1ea92717d6a6647d7b084f77&pid=1-s2.0-S0924857924001845-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Novel Beta-Lactams and Beta-Lactam with Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations for the Treatment of Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Novel beta-lactams show activity against many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause severe lung infections. Understanding pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of these agents may help optimise outcomes in the treatment of pneumonia.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe and appraise studies that report pulmonary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Scopus libraries were used for the literature search. Pulmonary population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies on adult patients receiving cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Two independent authors screened, reviewed and extracted data from included articles. A reporting guideline for clinical pharmacokinetic studies (ClinPK statement) was used for bias assessment. Relevant outcomes were included, such as population pharmacokinetic parameters and probability of target attainment of dosing regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-four articles were included. There was heterogeneity in study methods and reporting of results, with diversity across studies in adhering to the ClinPK statement checklist. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most studied agent. Only two studies collected epithelial lining fluid samples from patients with pneumonia. All the other phase I studies enrolled healthy subjects. Significant population heterogeneity was evident among available population pharmacokinetic models. Probabilities of target attainment rates above 90% using current licensed dosing regiments were reported in most studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although lung pharmacokinetics was rarely described, this review observed high target attainment using plasma pharmacokinetic data for all novel beta-lactams. Future studies should describe lung pharmacokinetics in patient populations at risk of carbapenem-resistant pathogen infections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001845/pdfft?md5=4e6d895c1ea92717d6a6647d7b084f77&pid=1-s2.0-S0924857924001845-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001845\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924001845","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新型β-内酰胺类药物对许多导致严重肺部感染的多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌具有活性。了解这些药物的药代动力学/药效学特征有助于优化肺炎的治疗效果:描述并评估报告头孢克洛、头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦、头孢洛氮烷/他唑巴坦、亚胺培南/西司他丁/雷巴坦和美罗培南/伐巴内酰胺的肺部药代动力学和药效学数据的研究:方法:使用 MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus 图书馆进行文献检索。纳入了在同行评审期刊上发表的关于接受头孢哌酮、头孢唑肟/阿维巴坦、头孢洛氮烷/他唑巴坦、亚胺培南/西司他丁/雷巴坦和美罗培南/伐硼巴坦治疗的成年患者的肺部群体药代动力学和药代动力学/药效学研究。两位独立作者对纳入的文章进行了筛选、审阅和数据提取。偏倚评估采用了临床药代动力学研究报告指南(ClinPK 声明)。纳入了相关结果,如群体药代动力学参数和用药方案达到目标的概率:结果:共纳入 24 篇文章。研究方法和结果报告存在异质性,各研究在遵守 ClinPK 声明核对表方面也存在差异。头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦是研究最多的药物。只有两项研究收集了肺炎患者的上皮内衬液样本。所有其他 I 期研究均以健康受试者为研究对象。在现有的群体药代动力学模型中,明显存在明显的群体异质性。大多数研究报告称,使用目前许可的给药方案,达标率超过 90%:尽管很少对肺部药代动力学进行描述,但本综述观察到所有新型β-内酰胺类药物的血浆药代动力学数据都能达到很高的目标值。未来的研究应描述耐碳青霉烯类病原体感染风险患者的肺部药代动力学。
A Systematic Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Novel Beta-Lactams and Beta-Lactam with Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations for the Treatment of Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
Background
Novel beta-lactams show activity against many multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause severe lung infections. Understanding pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of these agents may help optimise outcomes in the treatment of pneumonia.
Objectives
To describe and appraise studies that report pulmonary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam.
Methods
MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Scopus libraries were used for the literature search. Pulmonary population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies on adult patients receiving cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Two independent authors screened, reviewed and extracted data from included articles. A reporting guideline for clinical pharmacokinetic studies (ClinPK statement) was used for bias assessment. Relevant outcomes were included, such as population pharmacokinetic parameters and probability of target attainment of dosing regimens.
Results
Twenty-four articles were included. There was heterogeneity in study methods and reporting of results, with diversity across studies in adhering to the ClinPK statement checklist. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most studied agent. Only two studies collected epithelial lining fluid samples from patients with pneumonia. All the other phase I studies enrolled healthy subjects. Significant population heterogeneity was evident among available population pharmacokinetic models. Probabilities of target attainment rates above 90% using current licensed dosing regiments were reported in most studies.
Conclusions
Although lung pharmacokinetics was rarely described, this review observed high target attainment using plasma pharmacokinetic data for all novel beta-lactams. Future studies should describe lung pharmacokinetics in patient populations at risk of carbapenem-resistant pathogen infections.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.